Bug#592750: linux-2.6: fan not active after sleep/hibernate

2011-09-03 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Philip Ashmore wrote:

> I think this bug should be renamed to linux-3.0: fan behaves differently
> after sleep/hibernate.

Are these the same symptoms you noticed with 2.6.32-23?

If not, it will be a lot easier for others reporting bugs and to
figure out what to backport if that gets filed as a separate bug (or
cloned using an appropriate message to cont...@bugs.debian.org ---
either way is fine).

It's a shame the fan state is getting borked in some way on resume.
Thanks for reporting it.

Jonathan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#592750: linux-2.6: fan not active after sleep/hibernate

2010-10-04 Thread Philip Ashmore

Ben Hutchings wrote:

synaptic makes this difficult.  Use apt:

apt-get install linux-image-2.6.36-rc5-amd64 linux-base/experimental

Ben.
  

Done.
It seems OK but recently I tried running GoogleEarth after a resume from 
hibernate and my system froze.


Should I report this separately?

Philip



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#592750: linux-2.6: fan not active after sleep/hibernate

2010-10-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 01:17:27PM +0100, Philip Ashmore wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> synaptic makes this difficult.  Use apt:
>>
>> apt-get install linux-image-2.6.36-rc5-amd64 linux-base/experimental
>>
>> Ben.
>>   
> Done.
> It seems OK but recently I tried running GoogleEarth after a resume from  
> hibernate and my system froze.
>
> Should I report this separately?

rc6 should available soonest, please try to reproduce on rc6 and if possible
file new report please.

thanks.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#592750: linux-2.6: fan not active after sleep/hibernate

2010-10-03 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 14:36 +0100, Philip Ashmore wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I think we need to pass this upstream, but before that can you test
> > Linux 2.6.36-rc5 as packaged in experimental?
> >
> > Ben.
> >   
> I tried enabling experimental and installing Linux 2.6.36-rc5 but 
> synaptic reported
> linux-image-2.6.36-rc5-amd64:
>   Depends: linux-base (>=2.6.36~rc5-1~experimental.1) but 2.6.32-21 is 
> to be installed
>   Recommends: firmware-linux-free (>=2.6.36~rc5) but 2.6.32-5 is to be 
> installed

synaptic makes this difficult.  Use apt:

apt-get install linux-image-2.6.36-rc5-amd64 linux-base/experimental

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#592750: linux-2.6: fan not active after sleep/hibernate

2010-10-03 Thread Philip Ashmore

Ben Hutchings wrote:

I think we need to pass this upstream, but before that can you test
Linux 2.6.36-rc5 as packaged in experimental?

Ben.
  
I tried enabling experimental and installing Linux 2.6.36-rc5 but 
synaptic reported

linux-image-2.6.36-rc5-amd64:
 Depends: linux-base (>=2.6.36~rc5-1~experimental.1) but 2.6.32-21 is 
to be installed
 Recommends: firmware-linux-free (>=2.6.36~rc5) but 2.6.32-5 is to be 
installed


Philip



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#592750: linux-2.6: fan not active after sleep/hibernate

2010-10-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 23:02 +0100, Philip Ashmore wrote:
> reopen linux-2.6.32-5-amd64
> thanks
> 
> It looks like I spoke too soon.
> It occurred three times since I reported it fixed - meaning it works 
> about 4 out of 5 times.

This looks like a similar bug to
, but that is
supposed to have been fixed in stable update 2.6.32.17.

I think we need to pass this upstream, but before that can you test
Linux 2.6.36-rc5 as packaged in experimental?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#592750: linux-2.6: fan not active after sleep/hibernate

2010-09-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:06:13PM +0100, Philip Ashmore wrote:
> reopen
> thanks
>
>
> Maybe this will work

No, you have to use the control address; see
.  Anyway, I have reopened the bug
for you.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
  - Albert Camus



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#592750: linux-2.6: fan not active after sleep/hibernate

2010-09-29 Thread Philip Ashmore

reopen
thanks


Maybe this will work



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#592750: linux-2.6: fan not active after sleep/hibernate

2010-09-28 Thread Philip Ashmore

reopen linux-2.6.32-5-amd64
thanks

It looks like I spoke too soon.
It occurred three times since I reported it fixed - meaning it works 
about 4 out of 5 times.


Philip



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#592750: linux-2.6: fan not active after sleep/hibernate

2010-09-04 Thread Philip Ashmore
> Perhaps you should test linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 rather than running
> that old kernel version.

Indeed.
I thought that "trunk" meant "latest".
I switched to it to get my Atheros wireless working.

Anyway I can confirm that the problems don't occur with 2.6.32-5-amd64.
I'm triple-booting (Debian-Lenny,Debian-Squeeze,Ubuntu-Lucid) so I tried Ubuntu 
and the
problem's there too - with 2.6.32-5-amd64 - see

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/629953

which I can only conclude is a regression.
Please close this bug.

Thanks,
Philip