Hey,
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 17:06 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Any update on this? Has it been forwarded upstream?
I haven't forwarded it. In part because this is way out of my depth and
I would totally fail trying to act as a bridge or in making a case for
why this is a bug worth fixing at all.
I think falling back to a non-asm JIT or to the interpreter would be a
solution, but I have no idea of how complex it would be to support it, I
imagine it would be quite complex and that might not be desired.
If anyone with more knowledge about these issues would like to champion
the cause upstream let me know.
Cheers,
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva k...@debian.org
Debian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
