Bug#608192: RM: inn2 [hurd-i386 mips mipsel] -- ROM; old packages preventing an urgent TPU upload
On Dec 29, Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org wrote: What about suck source package? I don't know, what are the options? I think it can stay unbuildable in unstable until the next inn2 upload there. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#608192: RM: inn2 [hurd-i386 mips mipsel] -- ROM; old packages preventing an urgent TPU upload
Il 29/12/2010 11:46, Marco d'Itri ha scritto: I don't know, what are the options? I think it can stay unbuildable in unstable until the next inn2 upload there. Removing inn2 packages would make suck unbuildable on squeeze too. If this is just temporary, I think it should be fine, otherwise you could consider asking partial removal for suck too. Anyway, if RT wants to proceed with removal without touching suck, fine. -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org `. `' `- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#608192: RM: inn2 [hurd-i386 mips mipsel] -- ROM; old packages preventing an urgent TPU upload
On Dec 29, Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org wrote: Removing inn2 packages would make suck unbuildable on squeeze too. If The goal of this removal is to allow me to immediately upload a new inn2 package to t-p-u, so this will be temporary. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#608192: RM: inn2 [hurd-i386 mips mipsel] -- ROM; old packages preventing an urgent TPU upload
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal inn2 fails to build on mips* and hurd, but nor me nor the INN upstream maintainers nor the libdb maintainer understand why so I cannot upload a fixed package instead. inn2 and the other related binary packages need to be removed from unstable for these architectures to allow me to upload 2.5.2-2~squeeze1 to TPU to fix a RC bug. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
