Bug#608746: etherboot: switch to ipxe?

2011-01-03 Thread Michael Prokop 
Package: etherboot
Version: 5.4.4-8
Severity: wishlist


Are there any plans to switch to the ipxe codebase or will the
etherboot Debian package stay based on the etherboot/gpxe code for
the foreseeable future (so people might consider packaging ipxe
independent from the etherboot package)?

See http://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commit/8406115 and
http://ipxe.org/faq#how_does_ipxe_relate_to_gpxe_and_etherboot
for further details.

regards,
-mika-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2011-01-03t11-47...@devnull.michael-prokop.at

Bug#474034: Bug#608746: etherboot: switch to ipxe?

2011-01-03 Thread Daniel Baumann 
retitle 474034 ITP: ipxe -- PXE network bootloader for x86 PCs
thanks

On 01/03/2011 11:51 AM, Michael Prokop wrote:
 Are there any plans to switch to the ipxe codebase or will the
 etherboot Debian package stay based on the etherboot/gpxe code for
 the foreseeable future (so people might consider packaging ipxe
 independent from the etherboot package)?

ipxe is packaged seperately, replacing etherboot for wheezy, see #474034
for progress. now that new processing seems working again, i'll catch up
with it after my vac.

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:   http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org