Bug#611326: Further information

2011-02-24 Thread Edmund Eyles
The only XFCE developer who seemed remotely interested in this problem 
suggested I try installing XFCE 4.8.  This is available only as source. 
 I downloaded this and attempted to follow the build instructions 
provided.  After many hours of thrashing about in a state of ignorance, 
"aided" by a different XFCE developer whose help could be described only 
as obstructive, I ended up with a build, only to realise that that was 
not the end: it needs to be installed somewhere.  The final post I have 
made for XFCE bug 7231 concludes this sorry story:


I now appear to have successfully built XFCE 4.8, but I have no idea how 
to actually install it.  The build process creates a lot of executables, 
but does not seem to put them in the right place.  There are no 
installation instructions available on the XFCE site.  I have made a 
forum post asking for help, which has been met with a deafening silence 
in the space of 10 days.  I can go no further, and in any case I have no 
motivation to devote any more of my time to this.  Do what you want with 
this bug.  Bye-bye XFCE, I wish I could say it was nice knowing you.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#611326: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#611326: Further information

2011-02-03 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
forwarded 611326 http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7231
thanks

On jeu., 2011-02-03 at 12:15 +, Edmund Eyles wrote:
> In an attempt to get things moving, I have entered this into XFCE's 
> bugzilla system as bug 7231.

Thanks, marking it as such.

-- 
Yves-Alexis




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#611326: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#611326: Further information

2011-02-03 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On jeu., 2011-02-03 at 11:35 +, Edmund Eyles wrote:
> I have to say I am seriously considering ditching XFCE because of this 
> problem.  I reported the bug 6 days ago, and there has been no 
> acknowledgement or response other than automated replies from your 
> system.  There is no indication of the status of this bug within your 
> system.  The bug has not found its way through to XFCE's bug tracking 
> system.  I can conclude only that you are not maintaining this within 
> Debian.

Your help is gladly welcome, by the way.
-- 
Yves-Alexis




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#611326: Further information

2011-02-03 Thread Edmund Eyles
In an attempt to get things moving, I have entered this into XFCE's 
bugzilla system as bug 7231.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#611326: Further information

2011-02-03 Thread Edmund Eyles

I have now discovered that when the panel gets into this spin, it can be
stopped by opening the panel properties and changing it from 'Normal
height' to 'Full height'.  This causes the vertical panel to expand to
fit the height of the screen.  The juddering stops, and the CPU usage of
the panel process drops to what I presume is normal: 1.5% - 2%.  (I find 
it a little odd that the process is not more idle.)


I have to say I am seriously considering ditching XFCE because of this 
problem.  I reported the bug 6 days ago, and there has been no 
acknowledgement or response other than automated replies from your 
system.  There is no indication of the status of this bug within your 
system.  The bug has not found its way through to XFCE's bug tracking 
system.  I can conclude only that you are not maintaining this within 
Debian.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org