Bug#613981: serna-free: serna 4.3 is out
Hi, Am Montag, den 21.02.2011, 22:34 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: > > I did not try building yet, I’ll come to that tomorrow. > > Fantastic ! built and uploaded. Thanks for helping out on this. Now that you are an officially co-maintainer and have the upload rights, feel free to improve on the package as you feel fit, I’m not claiming exlusive ownership of the package. Also note that upstream has set up a bugtracker: https://bitbucket.org/syntext/serna-free-4-3/issues Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#613981: serna-free: serna 4.3 is out
Hi, On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote: > now it worked. I imported that upstream version into the git repository > (which uses the git-dpm scheme, in case you did not know. In that case, > you might want to have a look at http://git-dpm.alioth.debian.org/). > This automatically rebased all patches, and indeed they applied cleanly. I did not know about git-dpm. Thanks. > I also changed the version to carry the date, as the 4.3.0 branch does > change, and noted the exact hg revision in debian/get-orig-source. Do > you agree with that approach? completely. see my other patch coming in to directly read the version from debian/changelog. > I generate the tarball using hg archive. Also, due to pristine-tar, the > exact tarball can be extracted from the git archive. even better ! > I did not try building yet, I’ll come to that tomorrow. Fantastic ! -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613981: serna-free: serna 4.3 is out
Hi again, Am Montag, den 21.02.2011, 21:22 +0530 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > Am Montag, den 21.02.2011, 15:31 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: > > > thanks for the patch, and for testing the new version. > > > > > > I’m not sure if using an untagged branch as the source is useful – did > > > they not release a tarball for that version? And if not, how about > > > hard-coding the revision in the script? Or just not use such a script at > > > all, and manually build the tarball – that’s how I did it with the SVN > > > snapshots so far. > > > > I could not find any tarball. There is no tag AFAIK. > > I simply assumed that there is no activity in the 4.3 branch to call it > > 4.3.0; > > > > the version is hardcoded in my get-orig-source.sh script. I added the > > get-orig-source target as par recommendation for a debian package. > > > > This make it simplier for other people to download serna. > > After the initial upload of 4.3 to Debian, people can just use > the .orig.tar.gz. This is especially recommended with more than one > maintainer, as the other maintainers need to work with a > bit-identical .orig.tar.gz, or the upload will fail. > > Anyways, it seems that mercurial and the proxy here don’t like each > other. Can you upload your .orig.tar.gz somewhere, e.g. on your alioth > space? now it worked. I imported that upstream version into the git repository (which uses the git-dpm scheme, in case you did not know. In that case, you might want to have a look at http://git-dpm.alioth.debian.org/). This automatically rebased all patches, and indeed they applied cleanly. I also changed the version to carry the date, as the 4.3.0 branch does change, and noted the exact hg revision in debian/get-orig-source. Do you agree with that approach? I generate the tarball using hg archive. Also, due to pristine-tar, the exact tarball can be extracted from the git archive. I did not try building yet, I’ll come to that tomorrow. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#613981: serna-free: serna 4.3 is out
Hi, Am Montag, den 21.02.2011, 15:31 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: > > thanks for the patch, and for testing the new version. > > > > I’m not sure if using an untagged branch as the source is useful – did > > they not release a tarball for that version? And if not, how about > > hard-coding the revision in the script? Or just not use such a script at > > all, and manually build the tarball – that’s how I did it with the SVN > > snapshots so far. > > I could not find any tarball. There is no tag AFAIK. > I simply assumed that there is no activity in the 4.3 branch to call it 4.3.0; > > the version is hardcoded in my get-orig-source.sh script. I added the > get-orig-source target as par recommendation for a debian package. > > This make it simplier for other people to download serna. After the initial upload of 4.3 to Debian, people can just use the .orig.tar.gz. This is especially recommended with more than one maintainer, as the other maintainers need to work with a bit-identical .orig.tar.gz, or the upload will fail. Anyways, it seems that mercurial and the proxy here don’t like each other. Can you upload your .orig.tar.gz somewhere, e.g. on your alioth space? > BTW I could not find a README.source file explaining the reason for > antlr (I had to read the ITP bug for serna...) You mean the reason for antlr being bundled? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#613981: serna-free: serna 4.3 is out
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > > Am Montag, den 21.02.2011, 15:09 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: >> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote: >> > Am Freitag, den 18.02.2011, 17:53 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: >> >> Thanks a lot for packaging serna ! >> >> >> >> Just a quick info: serna-free 4.3 is out ! >> >> >> >> http://www.syntext.com/downloads/serna-free/ >> >> >> >> It would be nice to update the package >> > >> > thanks. I noticed already, and also found out that they moved their VCS >> > to mercurial, but did not have time to look at the package. >> > >> > Anyways, I would not mind help with that package so if anyone feels like >> > working on the new version (involves building it, seeing which patches >> > are still required and which need to be updated, trying to use more >> > system libraries and less bundled libraries and checking for licensing >> > changes since the last version) that would be appreciated. I’d happily >> > review and upload the changes. My current state of packaging is found at >> > http://git.nomeata.de/?p=serna.git;a=summary >> >> >> $ git send-email *.patch --to='Joachim Breitner ' >> --cc='613...@bugs.debian.org' >> >> Patch should be send to you and the bug. >> >> All your patches applied with no fuzz needed. debian 0.288 and >> upstream 4.3 and very close (patch is ~800 line of unified diff). I >> could not remove any of your 3rd package dependencies so far. >> >> 568910 is still unresolved in 4.3.0 ... >> >> thanks > > thanks for the patch, and for testing the new version. > > I’m not sure if using an untagged branch as the source is useful – did > they not release a tarball for that version? And if not, how about > hard-coding the revision in the script? Or just not use such a script at > all, and manually build the tarball – that’s how I did it with the SVN > snapshots so far. I could not find any tarball. There is no tag AFAIK. I simply assumed that there is no activity in the 4.3 branch to call it 4.3.0; the version is hardcoded in my get-orig-source.sh script. I added the get-orig-source target as par recommendation for a debian package. This make it simplier for other people to download serna. BTW I could not find a README.source file explaining the reason for antlr (I had to read the ITP bug for serna...) thanks -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613981: serna-free: serna 4.3 is out
Hi, Am Montag, den 21.02.2011, 15:09 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: > On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 18.02.2011, 17:53 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: > >> Thanks a lot for packaging serna ! > >> > >> Just a quick info: serna-free 4.3 is out ! > >> > >> http://www.syntext.com/downloads/serna-free/ > >> > >> It would be nice to update the package > > > > thanks. I noticed already, and also found out that they moved their VCS > > to mercurial, but did not have time to look at the package. > > > > Anyways, I would not mind help with that package so if anyone feels like > > working on the new version (involves building it, seeing which patches > > are still required and which need to be updated, trying to use more > > system libraries and less bundled libraries and checking for licensing > > changes since the last version) that would be appreciated. I’d happily > > review and upload the changes. My current state of packaging is found at > > http://git.nomeata.de/?p=serna.git;a=summary > > > $ git send-email *.patch --to='Joachim Breitner ' > --cc='613...@bugs.debian.org' > > Patch should be send to you and the bug. > > All your patches applied with no fuzz needed. debian 0.288 and > upstream 4.3 and very close (patch is ~800 line of unified diff). I > could not remove any of your 3rd package dependencies so far. > > 568910 is still unresolved in 4.3.0 ... > > thanks thanks for the patch, and for testing the new version. I’m not sure if using an untagged branch as the source is useful – did they not release a tarball for that version? And if not, how about hard-coding the revision in the script? Or just not use such a script at all, and manually build the tarball – that’s how I did it with the SVN snapshots so far. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#613981: serna-free: serna 4.3 is out
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi Mathieu, > > Am Freitag, den 18.02.2011, 17:53 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: >> Thanks a lot for packaging serna ! >> >> Just a quick info: serna-free 4.3 is out ! >> >> http://www.syntext.com/downloads/serna-free/ >> >> It would be nice to update the package > > thanks. I noticed already, and also found out that they moved their VCS > to mercurial, but did not have time to look at the package. > > Anyways, I would not mind help with that package so if anyone feels like > working on the new version (involves building it, seeing which patches > are still required and which need to be updated, trying to use more > system libraries and less bundled libraries and checking for licensing > changes since the last version) that would be appreciated. I’d happily > review and upload the changes. My current state of packaging is found at > http://git.nomeata.de/?p=serna.git;a=summary $ git send-email *.patch --to='Joachim Breitner ' --cc='613...@bugs.debian.org' Patch should be send to you and the bug. All your patches applied with no fuzz needed. debian 0.288 and upstream 4.3 and very close (patch is ~800 line of unified diff). I could not remove any of your 3rd package dependencies so far. 568910 is still unresolved in 4.3.0 ... thanks -- Mathieu Ps: I added myself to uploader by default, remove me if you do not want to, I have no problem with that. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613981: serna-free: serna 4.3 is out
Hi Mathieu, Am Freitag, den 18.02.2011, 17:53 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: > Thanks a lot for packaging serna ! > > Just a quick info: serna-free 4.3 is out ! > > http://www.syntext.com/downloads/serna-free/ > > It would be nice to update the package thanks. I noticed already, and also found out that they moved their VCS to mercurial, but did not have time to look at the package. Anyways, I would not mind help with that package so if anyone feels like working on the new version (involves building it, seeing which patches are still required and which need to be updated, trying to use more system libraries and less bundled libraries and checking for licensing changes since the last version) that would be appreciated. I’d happily review and upload the changes. My current state of packaging is found at http://git.nomeata.de/?p=serna.git;a=summary Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#613981: serna-free: serna 4.3 is out
Package: serna-free Severity: normal Hi, Thanks a lot for packaging serna ! Just a quick info: serna-free 4.3 is out ! http://www.syntext.com/downloads/serna-free/ It would be nice to update the package Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (200, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
