Bug#618964: rdiff-backup is not friendly at all when called with --help

[Pablo Mestre]

As this bugs is a request for the upstreamer I open an issue [1] and
forward the request to this bug.

[1] https://github.com/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup/issues/749

--
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Pablo Mestre Drake
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  --
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   https://debian.org
  ⠈⠳⣄  Debian, the universal operating system.

Bug#618964: rdiff-backup is not friendly at all when called with --help

[Pablo Mestre]

This problem is still present in the latest versions of rdiff-backup

It should be useful to add the "help" parameter to rdiff-backup bc is
the most common option in any Linux command

Regards

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Pablo Mestre Drake
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  --
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   https://debian.org
  ⠈⠳⣄  Debian, the universal operating system.

Bug#618964: rdiff-backup is not friendly at all when called with --help

[Pablo Mestre]

Thank you very much for reporting this error.
 
I would like to ask you if this error is still present in the most
recent versions of rdiff-backup. Currently after a series of
improvements and bug fixes, rdiff-backup is at version 2.0.5

It would be very helpful if you checked again if this bug is still
present. Otherwise we can agree to close the bug,

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Pablo Mestre Drake
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  --
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   https://debian.org
  ⠈⠳⣄  Debian, the universal operating system.

Bug#618964: rdiff-backup is not friendly at all when called with --help

[Rogério Brito]

Package: rdiff-backup
Version: 1.2.8-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream

Hi there.

I have just started using rdiff-backup to, hummm, backup some of my files
and some of the options are not exactly mnemonic. Then, by pure muscule
memory, I always type rdiff-backup --help and I am greeted with the less
than helpful:

,[ rdiff-backup --help ]
| Fatal Error: Bad commandline options: option --help not recognized
| See the rdiff-backup manual page for more information.
`

This is just a papercut-like bug that is easy to fix. I see that upstream
already has a new development version of rdiff-backup that may, perhaps,
have this feature.

Is there the possibility of either packaging a newer version or of putting a
patch in the version that is currently in sid?


Thanks,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-1-686-bigmem (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages rdiff-backup depends on:
ii  libc6 2.11.2-11  Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  librsync1 0.9.7-7rsync remote-delta algorithm libra
ii  python2.6.6-11   interactive high-level object-orie
ii  python-support1.0.12 automated rebuilding support for P

Versions of packages rdiff-backup recommends:
pn  python-pylibacl   none (no description available)
pn  python-pyxattrnone (no description available)

rdiff-backup suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFC
http://rb.doesntexist.org : Packages for LaTeX : algorithms.berlios.de
DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org