Bug#623393: strace darktable
Sorry to supply information piecemeal, but maybe this strace run is somewhat helpful? http://www.pangea.at/~ralph/darktable.strace /ralph -- http://www.flickr.com/photos/sooperkuh/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#623393: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#623393: strace darktable
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:50:29 +0200, Ralph Aichinger ra...@mail.pangea.at wrote: The CPU is an older Athlon XP, it most certainly does not support SSE2: Unfortunately currently darktable does not run without SSE2 support. Upstream is working on the problem, so perhaps in the medium term future this will be fixed. I'm currently thinking about the best way to detect/document this. As a side comment, darktable is pretty resource hungry, so I'm not sure how happy you would be with its performance on an Athlon XP. Not that you shouldn't have the right to decide for yourself, of course ;). David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#623393: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#623393: strace darktable
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:41:32 +0200, Ralph Aichinger ra...@mail.pangea.at wrote: Sorry to supply information piecemeal, but maybe this strace run is somewhat helpful? http://www.pangea.at/~ralph/darktable.strace SIGILL sometimes indicates lack of SSE2 support in the CPU. On the other hand, that doesn't seem to match the other crash info you provided. Just to eliminate the possibility, can you tell me about the processor where this occurs and/or verify that is has SSE2 (most modern intel x86 and all amd64 do). d -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
