Bug#624928: Backport or new upstream version?
Hi, On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:21:06PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 08:43:58PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > Matt Kraai wrote: > > > I'll try to put together a patch and, if you'd like, perform an NMU. > > Please don't bother, it is trivial and done, sorry for not telling you > > that in the first place and tagging the bug accordingly. > > Can you please fix that in unstable in the meantime? I believe this is tied up with the gnustep transition, bug 629477, but I don't understand what the state of that bug is. -- Matt Kraai https://ftbfs.org/kraai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#624928: Backport or new upstream version?
Hi, On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 08:43:58PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > Matt Kraai wrote: > > I'll try to put together a patch and, if you'd like, perform an NMU. > Please don't bother, it is trivial and done, sorry for not telling you > that in the first place and tagging the bug accordingly. Can you please fix that in unstable in the meantime? Kind regards Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#624928: Backport or new upstream version?
tags 624928 + pending thanks Matt Kraai wrote: > I'll try to put together a patch and, if you'd like, perform an NMU. Please don't bother, it is trivial and done, sorry for not telling you that in the first place and tagging the bug accordingly. The only thing preventing an upload of a fixed package is the pending VCS migration (Arch->Git), but as it is an RC bug, I'll prepare it shortly. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#624928: Backport or new upstream version?
Matt Kraai wrote: > This bug appears to have been fixed upstream by multiple revisions > (i.e., at least 31763 and 31765) and, hopefully, in the latest 1.22.0 > release. That's correct. > Would it be better to upload the new upstream version or to backport > the required changes? The latter; 1.22.0 is ABI-incompatible and will be uploaded only to experimental for the time being. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#624928: Backport or new upstream version?
Hi, On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 07:52:10PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > Matt Kraai wrote: > > This bug appears to have been fixed upstream by multiple revisions > > (i.e., at least 31763 and 31765) and, hopefully, in the latest 1.22.0 > > release. > > That's correct. > > > Would it be better to upload the new upstream version or to backport > > the required changes? > > The latter; 1.22.0 is ABI-incompatible and will be uploaded only to > experimental for the time being. Thanks for the information. I'll try to put together a patch and, if you'd like, perform an NMU. -- Matt Kraai https://ftbfs.org/kraai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#624928: Backport or new upstream version?
Hi, This bug appears to have been fixed upstream by multiple revisions (i.e., at least 31763 and 31765) and, hopefully, in the latest 1.22.0 release. Would it be better to upload the new upstream version or to backport the required changes? -- Matt Kraai https://ftbfs.org/kraai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
