Bug#630730: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.32: GSO IPv6 issues)

2011-10-21 Thread Faidon Liambotis
found 630730 linux-2.6/2.6.32-38
thanks

I've checked with -38 and the fix doesn't seem to be there (i.e. I'm
still experiencing the effects). I'm looking at the source package and
even though the patches are in debian/patches, they do not seem to be
included from a series file.

I'm also checking SVN and specifically r18053, and it seems that the
patches were moved from features/all/{e1000e,igdb} to bugfix/all, the
lines for the former were removed from series/36 but no lines were added
on series/37 or anywhere else...

Best regards,
Faidon



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#630730: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.32: GSO IPv6 issues)

2011-10-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 23:13 +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
 found 630730 linux-2.6/2.6.32-38
 thanks
 
 I've checked with -38 and the fix doesn't seem to be there (i.e. I'm
 still experiencing the effects). I'm looking at the source package and
 even though the patches are in debian/patches, they do not seem to be
 included from a series file.
 
 I'm also checking SVN and specifically r18053, and it seems that the
 patches were moved from features/all/{e1000e,igdb} to bugfix/all, the
 lines for the former were removed from series/36 but no lines were added
 on series/37 or anywhere else...

Sorry about this.  The two patches in features/all/{e1000e,igb} were
fixes for just those two drivers and should have been replaced by the
patch covering all the Intel drivers.  I don't know how I failed to add
them to the series.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Larkinson's Law: All laws are basically false.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part