Bug#633460: pu: package freebsd-utils/8.1-4+squeeze1
Robert, am Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:32:52PM + hast du folgendes geschrieben: devd, the device state change daemon (similar to udev on Linux) was shipped in squeeze without its corresponding config file and init.d script, which makes it practically useless. This was reported (and fixed) as bug #630614 in sid. I'm proposing a backport of this fix, see attached diff. please go ahead. If it's causing any regressions after the next point release, please contact d-release@ so that we can push fixes through squeeze-updates. We are being more liberal with kfreebsd as regressions there only affect this `technology preview'. Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#633460: pu: package freebsd-utils/8.1-4+squeeze1
2011/7/29 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org: please go ahead. If it's causing any regressions after the next point release, please contact d-release@ so that we can push fixes through squeeze-updates. We are being more liberal with kfreebsd as regressions there only affect this `technology preview'. Uploaded. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#633460: pu: package freebsd-utils/8.1-4+squeeze1
2011/7/11 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: Looking at the BTS, it appears from the log of #601803 that the proposed changes to ifconfig for wireless support have not yet been proved to be complete and functional in unstable - is that correct? No, it has been proven to be functional both in unstable and in stable. Here's a report for unstable (which wasn't CCed to the BTS): http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/07/msg00094.html My local tests are succesful both in stable and unstable too, although I can't test it completely on my own because there are no visible APs. However the problem at hand (SIOCIFCREATE2: Bad address) has definitely disappeared. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#633460: pu: package freebsd-utils/8.1-4+squeeze1
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 09:05 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/7/11 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: Looking at the BTS, it appears from the log of #601803 that the proposed changes to ifconfig for wireless support have not yet been proved to be complete and functional in unstable - is that correct? [...] My local tests are succesful both in stable and unstable too, although I can't test it completely on my own because there are no visible APs. However the problem at hand (SIOCIFCREATE2: Bad address) has definitely disappeared. Apologies if I'm missing something, but in that case why is #601803 still open? There seemed to be a little confusion at the end of the report as to whether it was fixed or not. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#633460: pu: package freebsd-utils/8.1-4+squeeze1
Version: 8.2+ds1-1 2011/7/13 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: Apologies if I'm missing something, but in that case why is #601803 still open? There seemed to be a little confusion at the end of the report as to whether it was fixed or not. TBH, I don't really know. It was marked as fixed and later unmarked as a result of my control request [1], but it's clearly not what I intended. In any case, it was indeed fixed with 8.2+ds1-1. Sorry about this confusion. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=188;bug=601803 -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#633460: pu: package freebsd-utils/8.1-4+squeeze1
merge 633460 633475 thanks Hi, Please don't submit separate reports for multiple changes to the same package; it just makes it harder to keep track of things. On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 13:32 +, Robert Millan wrote: devd, the device state change daemon (similar to udev on Linux) was shipped in squeeze without its corresponding config file and init.d script, which makes it practically useless. This was reported (and fixed) as bug #630614 in sid. I notice that you've already uploaded the package including both sets of changes. Whilst we're admittedly sometimes not the fastest to respond, a lack of negative reply does not equate to permission to upload - particularly when barely 24 hours have passed since the initial request. In any case, I'm afraid I'll be rejecting the upload, due to the amount of cruft in the diff; e.g. debian/patches/.svn/text-base/032_delete_key.diff.svn-base| 2102 +++ debian/local/devd/.svn/entries| 130 debian/local/devd/.svn/text-base/debian.conf.svn-base | 22 debian/local/devd/.svn/text-base/pci.conf.svn-base| 1266 debian/local/devd/.svn/text-base/usb.conf.svn-base| 2791 + From an overall diffstat of 124 files changed, 27822 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) the vast majority appears to be VCS noise: $ filterdiff -x '*/.svn*' freebsd-utils_8.1-4+squeeze1.debdiff | diffstat | tail -n1 14 files changed, 6049 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#633460: pu: package freebsd-utils/8.1-4+squeeze1
2011/7/11 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: merge 633460 633475 thanks Hi, Please don't submit separate reports for multiple changes to the same package; it just makes it harder to keep track of things. Ok. I notice that you've already uploaded the package including both sets of changes. Whilst we're admittedly sometimes not the fastest to respond, a lack of negative reply does not equate to permission to upload - particularly when barely 24 hours have passed since the initial request. Sorry about that, I wasn't sure if approval needed to happen before or after the upload. I'll keep in mind next time. In any case, I'm afraid I'll be rejecting the upload, due to the amount of cruft in the diff; e.g. debian/patches/.svn/text-base/032_delete_key.diff.svn-base | 2102 +++ debian/local/devd/.svn/entries | 130 debian/local/devd/.svn/text-base/debian.conf.svn-base | 22 debian/local/devd/.svn/text-base/pci.conf.svn-base | 1266 debian/local/devd/.svn/text-base/usb.conf.svn-base | 2791 + My bad. It seems I somehow didn't have DH_ALWAYS_EXCLUDE when running debuild. Sorry again. Those issues aside, are the diffs I presented acceptable? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#633460: pu: package freebsd-utils/8.1-4+squeeze1
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 20:37 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/7/11 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: I notice that you've already uploaded the package including both sets of changes. Whilst we're admittedly sometimes not the fastest to respond, a lack of negative reply does not equate to permission to upload - particularly when barely 24 hours have passed since the initial request. Sorry about that, I wasn't sure if approval needed to happen before or after the upload. Having it beforehand tends to make things easier if there are any queries or issues. I'll keep in mind next time. Thanks. In any case, I'm afraid I'll be rejecting the upload, due to the amount of cruft in the diff; e.g. [...] Those issues aside, are the diffs I presented acceptable? In all honesty, I haven't yet had time to review them; I mostly replied at this point because of the diff noise - if it hadn't been for that, I'd probably not have commented until I (or someone else) had checked them a little more. Looking at the BTS, it appears from the log of #601803 that the proposed changes to ifconfig for wireless support have not yet been proved to be complete and functional in unstable - is that correct? Where the issue applies to both stable and unstable/testing, having it resolved in the latter suites is generally a prerequisite for a stable update. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
