Bug#633611: unblock: shibboleth-sp2/2.4.2+dfsg-2 (armel problems)

2011-07-13 Thread Philipp Kern
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 08:48:38PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
 The problem is that g++ bug #630752 means that shibboleth-sp2 cannot
 build on armel (the bug is present even when built with no optimization),
 which is now blocking migration of xml-security-c (along with xmltooling,
 opensaml2, and shibboleth-sp2), which has a security fix.

In the meantime I signed the missing powerpc build.  As soon as we get
xml-security-c accepted into proposed-updates we can copy it over to testing,
as it would be higher otherwise.  That should solve the security issue too, no?

Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
-- 
 .''`.  Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' :  http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager
`. `'   xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin
  `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#633611: unblock: shibboleth-sp2/2.4.2+dfsg-2 (armel problems)

2011-07-13 Thread Russ Allbery
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:
 On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 08:48:38PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:

 The problem is that g++ bug #630752 means that shibboleth-sp2 cannot
 build on armel (the bug is present even when built with no
 optimization), which is now blocking migration of xml-security-c (along
 with xmltooling, opensaml2, and shibboleth-sp2), which has a security
 fix.

 In the meantime I signed the missing powerpc build.  As soon as we get
 xml-security-c accepted into proposed-updates we can copy it over to
 testing, as it would be higher otherwise.  That should solve the
 security issue too, no?

Oh, yes.  That's probably an even better solution.  Thank you!

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)   http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#633611: unblock: shibboleth-sp2/2.4.2+dfsg-2 (armel problems)

2011-07-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hello folks,

I'm not quite sure what to do with this, and perhaps I should be filing
a bug against ftp.debian.org for an architecture removal, but I'll file
it here as a weird sort of unblock first to see if that's the right thing
to do.

The problem is that g++ bug #630752 means that shibboleth-sp2 cannot
build on armel (the bug is present even when built with no optimization),
which is now blocking migration of xml-security-c (along with xmltooling,
opensaml2, and shibboleth-sp2), which has a security fix.

I don't know what the options are here.  Is there a way to force the
migration and temporarily pull shibboleth-sp2 from testing for armel?
I don't really want to remove the binaries from unstable as well, since
the package really *should* build for armel and will again as soon as
this bug is fixed, but maybe that's the right short-term fix?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org