Bug#635251: any news on multi-arch for libpciaccess?
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 11:54 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:51:08AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:27:56 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: Any updates here? As a udev reverse dependency this is quite important for earlt multi-arch conversion. It'll probably happen on the next upload, but I'm not going to rush that. (What does this have to do with udev?) Looks like an ubuntuisim. needed inderectly for animated startup graphics, sigh. No hurry on debian side then it seems. libdrm-intel now depends on libpciaccess, plymouth depends on libdrm-intel, and so on. The -dev package shouldn't be marked as multiarch; the i386 package is not parallel installable with the amd64 package as they both ship /usr/include. In general, my understanding is that -dev packages should not be multiarched (yet). I should apparently also read Debian bug reports more often. I'd just pushed a dh7 cleanup branch which also adds multiarch to the debian-experimental git branch before reading this mail. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#635251: any news on multi-arch for libpciaccess?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:48:44PM +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: The -dev package shouldn't be marked as multiarch; the i386 package is not parallel installable with the amd64 package as they both ship /usr/include. In general, my understanding is that -dev packages should not be multiarched (yet). It is ok to incude same files in multiarch coinstallable packages, as long as they are identical on all archictectures. Think /usr/share/doc/libpciaccess0/copyright for example. Hence all -dev packages where headers are same on all architectures are safe for multiarch. Riku -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#635251: any news on multi-arch for libpciaccess?
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 16:38 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:48:44PM +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: The -dev package shouldn't be marked as multiarch; the i386 package is not parallel installable with the amd64 package as they both ship /usr/include. In general, my understanding is that -dev packages should not be multiarched (yet). It is ok to incude same files in multiarch coinstallable packages, as long as they are identical on all archictectures. Think /usr/share/doc/libpciaccess0/copyright for example. Hence all -dev packages where headers are same on all architectures are safe for multiarch. Yeah. I was confused by the documentation on wiki.debian.org/MultiArch/Implementation which said policy forbids -dev packages from being marked as Multi-Arch: same. As you say, that only applies where the contents of headers change across architectures. I've updated that documentation to hopefully be clearer. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#635251: any news on multi-arch for libpciaccess?
Hi, Any updates here? As a udev reverse dependency this is quite important for earlt multi-arch conversion. Riku -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#635251: any news on multi-arch for libpciaccess?
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:27:56 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: Hi, Any updates here? As a udev reverse dependency this is quite important for earlt multi-arch conversion. It'll probably happen on the next upload, but I'm not going to rush that. (What does this have to do with udev?) Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#635251: any news on multi-arch for libpciaccess?
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:51:08AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:27:56 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: Any updates here? As a udev reverse dependency this is quite important for earlt multi-arch conversion. It'll probably happen on the next upload, but I'm not going to rush that. (What does this have to do with udev?) Looks like an ubuntuisim. needed inderectly for animated startup graphics, sigh. No hurry on debian side then it seems. Riku -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
