Bug#642729: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: bad ssd performance with squeeze kernel 2.6.32

2011-10-24 Thread Juergen Bausa
Sorry, I dont want to bother. But there has been no comment in one month. Does 
this
mean that the kernel team is just too busy or does it mean that I posted in the 
wrong place?

Juergen
___
SMS schreiben mit WEB.DE FreeMail - einfach, schnell und
kostenguenstig. Jetzt gleich testen! http://f.web.de/?mc=021192



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#642729: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: bad ssd performance with squeeze kernel 2.6.32

2011-10-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 21:04 +0200, Juergen Bausa wrote:
 Sorry, I dont want to bother. But there has been no comment in one month. 
 Does this
 mean that the kernel team is just too busy or does it mean that I posted in 
 the wrong place?

This is the right place, but we're busy.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Reality is just a crutch for people who can't handle science fiction.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#642729: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: bad ssd performance with squeeze kernel 2.6.32

2011-09-24 Thread Jürgen Bausa
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Version: 2.6.32-35squeeze2jba
Severity: normal


After adding a ssd (OCZ Vertex Plus 60GB) to my squeeze system (debian kernel 
2.6.32) 
I was disappointed about its performance, as it was advertised with 185 MB/s.

/dev/sdb:
 Timing buffered disk reads: 214 MB in  3.01 seconds =  71.04 MB/sec
 
However, when running recent knoppix (kernel 3.0.4) I got the expected 
performance:

/dev/sdb:
 Timing buffered disk reads: 490 MB in  3.00 seconds = 163.07 MB/sec
 
After googling, I found that this has been reported before:

http://www.archivum.info/linux-...@vger.kernel.org/2010-02/00243/bad-performance-with-SSD-since-kernel-version-2.6.32.html

It seems that early versions of kernel 2.6.32 have a bug that results in bad 
performance of some
ssds (maybe all, at least the 'OCZ Vertex Plus 60GB' and the 'Super Talent 
Ultradrive GX MLC 64GB').
Reverting the patch as described in the discussion solved the problem for me. I 
now have the 
desired performance.

Thus, I would suggest to revert the patch block: improve queue_should_plug() 
by looking at 
IO depths in kernel 2.6.32 for squeeze in order to get full ssd performance. I 
think the bugfix 
is important as an increasing number of users havs  ssds and the bug more or 
less breaks ssd 
performance in squeeze.

Juergen



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 depends on:
ii  coreutils 8.5-1  GNU core utilities
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.36.1   Debian configuration management sy

linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 suggests:
pn  fdutils   none (no description available)
pn  ksymoops  none (no description available)
pn  linux-doc-2.6.32-5-686 | linu none (no description available)
pn  linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-dbg  none (no description available)

-- debconf information:
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-686/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.32-5-686:
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-686/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-686/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.32-5-686: false
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-686/postinst/ignoring-do-bootloader-2.6.32-5-686:
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-686/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.32-5-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-686/postinst/missing-firmware-2.6.32-5-686:
* linux-image-2.6.32-5-686/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.32-5-686: false
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-686/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.32-5-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-686/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.32-5-686: false
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-686/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.32-5-686: true
  linux-image-2.6.32-5-686/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.32-5-686:
* linux-image-2.6.32-5-686/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.32-5-686:



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org