Bug#648623: perl: test failures on hurd-i386
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:39:08AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:20:22AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 04:51:29PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Package: perl Version: 5.14.2-2 Severity: normal User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd A few tests fail on hurd-i386: Failed 9 tests out of 2029, 99.56% okay. ../cpan/Sys-Syslog/t/syslog.t ../cpan/Time-HiRes/t/HiRes.t ../cpan/autodie/t/recv.t ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t ../dist/threads/t/libc.t ../dist/threads/t/stack.t ../ext/Socket/t/socketpair.t io/pipe.t op/sigdispatch.t Could you mark them as TODO on GNU/Hurd? Has anybody looked at the issues behind these failures? I'd like to have a separate bug for each one, whether in hurd or perl, so that we could at least refer to them in the Debian patch that marks the tests as TODO. However, instead of patching the tests, I think I'd actually prefer just making debian/rules ignore test failures on GNU/Hurd so that the failures would stay visible in the build log. Possibly this should be accompanied by an RC bug on hurd so that the issues have to be resolved one way or another if it becomes a release architecture. Ignoring errors obviously has the downside of not catching any regressions automatically. I suppose the hurd folks would need to assume responsibility for that. I don't feel very strongly about this; please let me know what you think. I was about to implement this, but then I realised that ignoring the result of the whole test suite runs a real risk of installing a perl which is completely (or significantly) broken because of some other external change, so I think I'm swaying back towards the idea of patching out the failing tests instead. Definitely agree we should have bugs for each of the known failures. Bugs now created, and I'm almost done with the patches TODOing/SKIPing tests as appropriate. If there are no objections I'll push this later today or during the week. Cheers, Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#648623: perl: test failures on hurd-i386
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:20:22AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 04:51:29PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Package: perl Version: 5.14.2-2 Severity: normal User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd A few tests fail on hurd-i386: Failed 9 tests out of 2029, 99.56% okay. ../cpan/Sys-Syslog/t/syslog.t ../cpan/Time-HiRes/t/HiRes.t ../cpan/autodie/t/recv.t ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t ../dist/threads/t/libc.t ../dist/threads/t/stack.t ../ext/Socket/t/socketpair.t io/pipe.t op/sigdispatch.t Could you mark them as TODO on GNU/Hurd? Has anybody looked at the issues behind these failures? I'd like to have a separate bug for each one, whether in hurd or perl, so that we could at least refer to them in the Debian patch that marks the tests as TODO. However, instead of patching the tests, I think I'd actually prefer just making debian/rules ignore test failures on GNU/Hurd so that the failures would stay visible in the build log. Possibly this should be accompanied by an RC bug on hurd so that the issues have to be resolved one way or another if it becomes a release architecture. Ignoring errors obviously has the downside of not catching any regressions automatically. I suppose the hurd folks would need to assume responsibility for that. I don't feel very strongly about this; please let me know what you think. I was about to implement this, but then I realised that ignoring the result of the whole test suite runs a real risk of installing a perl which is completely (or significantly) broken because of some other external change, so I think I'm swaying back towards the idea of patching out the failing tests instead. Definitely agree we should have bugs for each of the known failures. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#648623: perl: test failures on hurd-i386
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:20:22AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 04:51:29PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Package: perl Version: 5.14.2-2 Severity: normal User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd A few tests fail on hurd-i386: Failed 9 tests out of 2029, 99.56% okay. ../cpan/Sys-Syslog/t/syslog.t ../cpan/Time-HiRes/t/HiRes.t ../cpan/autodie/t/recv.t ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t ../dist/threads/t/libc.t ../dist/threads/t/stack.t ../ext/Socket/t/socketpair.t io/pipe.t op/sigdispatch.t Could you mark them as TODO on GNU/Hurd? Has anybody looked at the issues behind these failures? I'd like to have a separate bug for each one, whether in hurd or perl, so that we could at least refer to them in the Debian patch that marks the tests as TODO. I agree. However, instead of patching the tests, I think I'd actually prefer just making debian/rules ignore test failures on GNU/Hurd so that the failures would stay visible in the build log. Possibly this should be accompanied by an RC bug on hurd so that the issues have to be resolved one way or another if it becomes a release architecture. The effect of TODO in t/test.pl it to run the tests but not make them fatal, I believe, so I don't think this holds? -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#648623: perl: test failures on hurd-i386
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:50:10PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:20:22AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: However, instead of patching the tests, I think I'd actually prefer just making debian/rules ignore test failures on GNU/Hurd so that the failures would stay visible in the build log. Possibly this should be accompanied by an RC bug on hurd so that the issues have to be resolved one way or another if it becomes a release architecture. The effect of TODO in t/test.pl it to run the tests but not make them fatal, I believe, so I don't think this holds? Those TODO failures are then visible only in verbose mode. Consider: % ./perl t/TEST io/perlio_leaks.t t/io/perlio_leaksok All tests successful. u=0.00 s=0.00 cu=0.00 cs=0.00 scripts=1 tests=12 vs. % ./perl t/TEST -v io/perlio_leaks.t t/io/perlio_leaksok 1 - :unix not ok 2 - :unix # TODO [perl #56644] PerlIO resource leaks on open() and then :pop in :unix and :stdio # Failed at io/perlio_leaks.t line 30 # got 4 # expected 3 not ok 3 - :unix # TODO [perl #56644] PerlIO resource leaks on open() and then :pop in :unix and :stdio # Failed at io/perlio_leaks.t line 30 # got 5 # expected 3 ok 4 - :stdio not ok 5 - :stdio # TODO [perl #56644] PerlIO resource leaks on open() and then :pop in :unix and :stdio # Failed at io/perlio_leaks.t line 30 # got 7 # expected 6 not ok 6 - :stdio # TODO [perl #56644] PerlIO resource leaks on open() and then :pop in :unix and :stdio # Failed at io/perlio_leaks.t line 30 # got 8 # expected 6 ok 7 - :perlio ok 8 - :perlio ok 9 - :perlio ok 10 - :crlf ok 11 - :crlf ok 12 - :crlf 1..12 ok All tests successful. u=0.00 s=0.00 cu=0.01 cs=0.00 scripts=1 tests=12 -- Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#648623: perl: test failures on hurd-i386
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 04:51:29PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Package: perl Version: 5.14.2-2 Severity: normal User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd A few tests fail on hurd-i386: Failed 9 tests out of 2029, 99.56% okay. ../cpan/Sys-Syslog/t/syslog.t ../cpan/Time-HiRes/t/HiRes.t ../cpan/autodie/t/recv.t ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t ../dist/threads/t/libc.t ../dist/threads/t/stack.t ../ext/Socket/t/socketpair.t io/pipe.t op/sigdispatch.t Could you mark them as TODO on GNU/Hurd? Has anybody looked at the issues behind these failures? I'd like to have a separate bug for each one, whether in hurd or perl, so that we could at least refer to them in the Debian patch that marks the tests as TODO. However, instead of patching the tests, I think I'd actually prefer just making debian/rules ignore test failures on GNU/Hurd so that the failures would stay visible in the build log. Possibly this should be accompanied by an RC bug on hurd so that the issues have to be resolved one way or another if it becomes a release architecture. Ignoring errors obviously has the downside of not catching any regressions automatically. I suppose the hurd folks would need to assume responsibility for that. I don't feel very strongly about this; please let me know what you think. -- Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#648623: perl: test failures on hurd-i386
Package: perl Version: 5.14.2-2 Severity: normal User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hello, A few tests fail on hurd-i386: Failed 9 tests out of 2029, 99.56% okay. ../cpan/Sys-Syslog/t/syslog.t ../cpan/Time-HiRes/t/HiRes.t ../cpan/autodie/t/recv.t ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t ../dist/threads/t/libc.t ../dist/threads/t/stack.t ../ext/Socket/t/socketpair.t io/pipe.t op/sigdispatch.t Could you mark them as TODO on GNU/Hurd? Thanks, Samuel -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.4 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages perl depends on: ii libbz2-1.01.0.5-7 ii libc6 2.13-21 ii libdb5.1 5.1.25-11 ii libgdbm3 1.8.3-10 ii perl-base 5.12.4-6 ii perl-modules 5.12.4-6 ii zlib1g1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 Versions of packages perl recommends: ii netbase 4.47 Versions of packages perl suggests: ii libterm-readline-gnu-perl | libterm-readline-perl-perl none ii make3.81-8.1 ii perl-doc5.12.4-6 -- no debconf information -- Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@fnac.net *** s has joined channel #ens-mim N re s pfff s mare de la pfp. s pas commencer et j'en ai deja marre. s bon ct juste un cou de gueule ++ *** s has left channel #ens-mim (s) -+- #ens-mim et la peufeupeu -+- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#648623: perl: test failures on hurd-i386
tags 648623 +confirmed thanks On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 04:51:29PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: A few tests fail on hurd-i386: Failed 9 tests out of 2029, 99.56% okay. ../cpan/Sys-Syslog/t/syslog.t ../cpan/Time-HiRes/t/HiRes.t ../cpan/autodie/t/recv.t ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t ../dist/threads/t/libc.t ../dist/threads/t/stack.t ../ext/Socket/t/socketpair.t io/pipe.t op/sigdispatch.t Could you mark them as TODO on GNU/Hurd? Yup, will do this after the initial 5.14 upload to unstable. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
