Bug#651394: 0.4 stuck in unstable
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 06:44:23PM +0100, Pierre Haessig wrote: > I took a look at the logs (the first time I browse buildd.debian.org. > Pretty neat system!) but I don't know what to say. > I can only see that armel build fails at line > > [...] /src/gui/bibtex/bibtexfileview.h:58:5: error: 'KSharedConfigPtr' > does not name a type > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=kbibtex&arch=armel&ver=0.4-1&stamp=1323921603 > > and on i386, there is no such failure : > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=kbibtex&arch=i386&ver=0.4-1&stamp=1323921180 > > But I guess the source are the same on both platform, right ? The source is the same, but ... > I've no idea what's going on, and I guess it's related to me getting > charmed by too many Pythons, or vice versa... ... the versions of the build dependencies might by different. That could mean we'll see this bug on other platforms too now, or that armel was the last one affected. You could help out by comparing versions in the logs. Thanks in advance, Michael -- Michael Hanke http://mih.voxindeserto.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#651394: 0.4 stuck in unstable
Hi, Le 03/01/2012 11:05, Michael Hanke a écrit : > I'm aware of the problem, but I didn't have time to track it down yet. > I'd appreciate someone stepping up and investigating this issue. I took a look at the logs (the first time I browse buildd.debian.org. Pretty neat system!) but I don't know what to say. I can only see that armel build fails at line [...] /src/gui/bibtex/bibtexfileview.h:58:5: error: 'KSharedConfigPtr' does not name a type https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=kbibtex&arch=armel&ver=0.4-1&stamp=1323921603 and on i386, there is no such failure : https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=kbibtex&arch=i386&ver=0.4-1&stamp=1323921180 But I guess the source are the same on both platform, right ? I've no idea what's going on, and I guess it's related to me getting charmed by too many Pythons, or vice versa... Best, Pierre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#651394: 0.4 stuck in unstable
Hi, On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 12:16:43PM +0100, Pierre Haessig wrote: > I don't know what the 'Maybe-Failed' status means, neither how it > compares with the 'Maybe-Successful' status. If I remember well, there > was some similar issue with version v0.4beta1, but on an other arch. Is > there something we can do about this apparently erratic behaviour of the > building process ? I'm aware of the problem, but I didn't have time to track it down yet. I'd appreciate someone stepping up and investigating this issue. I'm also looking for people to co-maintain, or even take over this package. Michael -- Michael Hanke http://mih.voxindeserto.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#651394: 0.4 stuck in unstable
Hi, There seems to be one small glitch with version 0.4 of kbibtex not compiling on armel http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=kbibtex This prevents v0.4 from entering Testing. I don't know what the 'Maybe-Failed' status means, neither how it compares with the 'Maybe-Successful' status. If I remember well, there was some similar issue with version v0.4beta1, but on an other arch. Is there something we can do about this apparently erratic behaviour of the building process ? Best, Pierre signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
