Bug#657314: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#657314: Bug#657314: Bug#657314: unstable: 2:3.6.1-3 fails to build due to incorrect python-ldb bindings
Quoting John David Anglin (dave.ang...@bell.net): If the package fails to build due to other unrelated packages being installed in the build environment, that's still a bug, just a lower-priority one. Well, the original message was showing a build that's different from the build we're really using when building the package Waf: Entering directory `/home/dave/debian/samba/samba-3.6.1/bin' 'reconfigure' finished successfully (13.520s) cd .. WAF_MAKE=1 buildtools/bin/waf --targets=smbtorture Waf: Entering directory `/home/dave/debian/samba/samba-3.6.1/bin' I would guess that there is a problem with include paths. The build should be picking up its header files, and not the system headers. From what I could see on the net, there have been incompatible changes in the python bindings for both the ldb and talloc source packages in recent versions. Possibly the simplest solution is to just add the conflicts. Certainly, it probably doesn't hurt to BUild-Conflicts with python-talloc and python-ldb (that are, from my understanding, the packages that create the problem). signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#657314: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#657314: Bug#657314: Bug#657314: unstable: 2:3.6.1-3 fails to build due to incorrect python-ldb bindings
Am 09/05/12 16:42, schrieb Christian PERRIER:Am 09/05/12 15:21, schrieb L. Alberto Giménez: Hi, Regarding http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652848 I'm thinking about buying a Line6 POD device, and I was wondering if I could make it work in Linux. Do you know if your package will work with newer POD devices? I mean, are they compatible? If true, I might help you maintaining the package since I could use it to interface my computer with the POD. Best regards! Quoting John David Anglin (dave.ang...@bell.net): If the package fails to build due to other unrelated packages being installed in the build environment, that's still a bug, just a lower-priority one. Well, the original message was showing a build that's different from the build we're really using when building the package Waf: Entering directory `/home/dave/debian/samba/samba-3.6.1/bin' 'reconfigure' finished successfully (13.520s) cd .. WAF_MAKE=1 buildtools/bin/waf --targets=smbtorture Waf: Entering directory `/home/dave/debian/samba/samba-3.6.1/bin' I would guess that there is a problem with include paths. The build should be picking up its header files, and not the system headers. From what I could see on the net, there have been incompatible changes in the python bindings for both the ldb and talloc source packages in recent versions. Possibly the simplest solution is to just add the conflicts. Certainly, it probably doesn't hurt to BUild-Conflicts with python-talloc and python-ldb (that are, from my understanding, the packages that create the problem). It should just be python-ldb and python-ldb-dev. The helper library for the python ldb module didn't have a stable API until recently (1.1.4 I think). Cheers, Jelmer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#657314: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#657314: Bug#657314: Bug#657314: unstable: 2:3.6.1-3 fails to build due to incorrect python-ldb bindings
Quoting Jelmer Vernooij (jel...@canonical.com): It should just be python-ldb and python-ldb-dev. The helper library for the python ldb module didn't have a stable API until recently (1.1.4 I think). I just committed such fix. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#657314: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#657314: Bug#657314: Bug#657314: unstable: 2:3.6.1-3 fails to build due to incorrect python-ldb bindings
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 07:21:26PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting John David Anglin (dave.ang...@bell.net): On 26-Jan-12, at 9:22 AM, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: ldb is also included in the Samba source tree, so a dependency isn't necessary. Can you reproduce this *without* any ldb libraries installed? I finally had a successful build. In addition to removing the ldb libraries, I had to remove the python-talloc packages. I think the problem is the I'm tempted to close this bug as this is not really related to the Debian package (that currently builds fine). If the package fails to build due to other unrelated packages being installed in the build environment, that's still a bug, just a lower-priority one. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#657314: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#657314: Bug#657314: Bug#657314: unstable: 2:3.6.1-3 fails to build due to incorrect python-ldb bindings
On 1/27/2012 1:54 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 07:21:26PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting John David Anglin (dave.ang...@bell.net): On 26-Jan-12, at 9:22 AM, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: ldb is also included in the Samba source tree, so a dependency isn't necessary. Can you reproduce this *without* any ldb libraries installed? I finally had a successful build. In addition to removing the ldb libraries, I had to remove the python-talloc packages. I think the problem is the I'm tempted to close this bug as this is not really related to the Debian package (that currently builds fine). If the package fails to build due to other unrelated packages being installed in the build environment, that's still a bug, just a lower-priority one. I would guess that there is a problem with include paths. The build should be picking up its header files, and not the system headers. From what I could see on the net, there have been incompatible changes in the python bindings for both the ldb and talloc source packages in recent versions. Possibly the simplest solution is to just add the conflicts. It shouldn't be necessary to manually supply the missing rfc's. Dave -- John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
