Bug#659530: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#659530: ghc: Add ELF linker support for hurd-i386

2012-02-13 Thread Joachim Breitner 
Hi,

Am Montag, den 13.02.2012, 20:16 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
 Samuel Thibault, le Sat 11 Feb 2012 23:55:34 +0100, a écrit :
  Joachim Breitner, le Sat 11 Feb 2012 23:36:44 +0100, a écrit :
   thanks. Is the patch tested, i.e. can I blindly apply and forward it to
   upstream?
  
  I'm doing it.
 
 Btw, it's confirmed.

Thanks. I’ll forward it to http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ as well,
unless you want to do it yourself (and get the ticket comment mails).

   Also, could you do a porter upload for hurd with the change for now;
  
  Ok, I'll do the build towards a debian-ports upload then. I understand
  the difficulties of managing a transition that affects almost 5%
  packages :)
 
 AIUI, I'll however have to rebuild all the packages that have been built
 so far, knowing that they'll again be built with the next unstable
 upload :)

Not necessarily. Your upload is built using 7.4.1. When I upload
7.4.1-1, it will be built with your upload, which is a 7.4.1 as well, so
most likely and hopefully, the hashes will be the same and no rebuilds
will be necessary.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
  nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#659530: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#659530: ghc: Add ELF linker support for hurd-i386

2012-02-13 Thread Samuel Thibault 
Joachim Breitner, le Mon 13 Feb 2012 19:35:28 +, a écrit :
 Am Montag, den 13.02.2012, 20:16 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
  Samuel Thibault, le Sat 11 Feb 2012 23:55:34 +0100, a écrit :
   Joachim Breitner, le Sat 11 Feb 2012 23:36:44 +0100, a écrit :
thanks. Is the patch tested, i.e. can I blindly apply and forward it to
upstream?
   
   I'm doing it.
  
  Btw, it's confirmed.
 
 Thanks. I’ll forward it to http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ as well,
 unless you want to do it yourself (and get the ticket comment mails).

Please do.

Also, could you do a porter upload for hurd with the change for now;
   
   Ok, I'll do the build towards a debian-ports upload then. I understand
   the difficulties of managing a transition that affects almost 5%
   packages :)
  
  AIUI, I'll however have to rebuild all the packages that have been built
  so far, knowing that they'll again be built with the next unstable
  upload :)
 
 Not necessarily. Your upload is built using 7.4.1. When I upload
 7.4.1-1, it will be built with your upload, which is a 7.4.1 as well, so
 most likely and hopefully, the hashes will be the same and no rebuilds
 will be necessary.

What are the hashes based on exactly? My rebuild with the ELF patch got
other hashes for

libghc-base-dev-4.5.0.0-78eb0
libghc-cabal-dev-1.14.0-b87dd
libghc-directory-dev-1.1.0.2-e6870
libghc-ghc-dev-7.4.1-59359
libghc-template-haskell-dev-2.7.0.0-f6fb4
libghc-unix-dev-2.5.1.0-d60c1

AIUI, base means that about all packages need to be rebuilt :/

Samuel



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org