Bug#659685: [ovs-dev] Bug#659685: Bug#659685: fails to build the kernel module
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:49:54PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:10:06PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Package: openvswitch-datapath-dkms Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: grave Hi there! First, thanks for maintaining OVS, this is a very nice software, which I will use with XCP (for which I'm working on the packaging, together with people from Citrix). Now, the less nice stuff... :) openvswitch-datapath-dkms fails to build its kernel module when I tried to install it in SID. Here's the relevant log: Building module: cleaning build area(bad exit status: 2) ./configure --with-linux=/usr/src/linux-headers-3.1.0-1-686-pae ; make -C datapath/linux..(bad exit status: 2) Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.1.0-1-686-pae (i686) Consult /var/lib/dkms/openvswitch/1.4.0/build/make.log for more information. and the make.log contains: make: Entering directory `/var/lib/dkms/openvswitch/1.4.0/build/datapath/linux' make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. make: Leaving directory `/var/lib/dkms/openvswitch/1.4.0/build/datapath/linux' I believe that the step building the Makefile was never run (but I didn't investigate more and used the module-assistant version). Indeed: Strange, I think that the Makefile should be created by ./configure, which features in the debian/dkms.conf.in. Would it be possible for you to provide your make.log? The config.log would be useful too. Thomas, it's possible that you're hitting the following bug. I committed a fix for it to all of our active branches a few minutes ago (so obviously it isn't in Debian yet): http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2012-February/014890.html If that is the problem, then you can work around it simply by installing the libc6-dev package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659685: [ovs-dev] Bug#659685: Bug#659685: fails to build the kernel module
On 02/14/2012 01:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: The config.log would be useful too. Thomas, it's possible that you're hitting the following bug. I committed a fix for it to all of our active branches a few minutes ago (so obviously it isn't in Debian yet): http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2012-February/014890.html If that is the problem, then you can work around it simply by installing the libc6-dev package. This is a development box on which I was trying to install openvswitch, so of course, libc6-dev was already installed. So no, that's not the issue, however, obviously libc6-dev is needed. On 02/13/2012 04:49 PM, Simon Horman wrote: Would it be possible for you to provide your make.log? I've attached it to this mail. On 02/13/2012 04:49 PM, Simon Horman wrote: Curiously installing openvswitch-datapath-dkms 1.4.0-1 does seem to work for me, also 3.1 but on amd64, though that may be a legacy of my environment. FYI: I run in 32 bits, because that's the most optimized environment for a Xen dom0. During the course of upgrading XCP from 1.3 to 1.3.2, I've hit 3 bugs already. I really hope that's going to be it! :) Thomas DKMS make.log for openvswitch-1.4.0 for kernel 3.1.0-1-686-pae (i686) Mon Feb 13 17:49:56 UTC 2012 checking build number... none checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking for suffix of executables... checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3 checking whether gcc and cc understand -c and -o together... yes checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E checking for ranlib... ranlib checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep checking for fgrep... /bin/grep -F checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking minix/config.h usability... no checking minix/config.h presence... no checking for minix/config.h... no checking whether it is safe to define __EXTENSIONS__... yes checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no checking for special C compiler options needed for large files... no checking for _FILE_OFFSET_BITS value needed for large files... 64 checking for library containing pow... -lm checking for library containing clock_gettime... -lrt checking for library containing timer_create... none required checking for linux/netlink.h... yes checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for SSL... yes checking for Python 2.x for x = 4... /usr/bin/python checking for pyuic4... no checking for PySide.QtCore Python module... no checking for PyQt4.QtCore Python module... yes checking for twisted.conch.ssh Python module... yes checking for twisted.internet Python module... yes checking for twisted.application Python module... yes checking for json Python module... yes checking for zope.interface Python module... yes checking whether to build ovsdbmonitor... yes checking for dot... no checking net/if_packet.h usability... yes checking net/if_packet.h presence... yes checking for net/if_packet.h... yes checking whether strtok_r macro segfaults on some inputs... no checking for struct stat.st_mtim.tv_nsec... yes checking for struct stat.st_mtimensec... no checking for mlockall... yes checking for strnlen... yes checking for strsignal... yes checking for getloadavg... yes checking for statvfs... yes checking for setmntent... yes checking mntent.h usability... yes checking mntent.h presence... yes checking for mntent.h... yes checking sys/statvfs.h usability... yes checking sys/statvfs.h presence... yes checking for sys/statvfs.h... yes checking linux/types.h usability... yes checking linux/types.h presence... yes checking for linux/types.h... yes checking execinfo.h usability... yes checking execinfo.h presence... yes checking for execinfo.h... yes checking for backtrace... yes checking whether libc supports hooks for malloc and related functions... yes checking valgrind/valgrind.h usability... no checking valgrind/valgrind.h presence... no checking for valgrind/valgrind.h... no checking for connect in -lsocket... no checking for library containing
Bug#659685: [ovs-dev] Bug#659685: Bug#659685: fails to build the kernel module
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:54:28AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 02/14/2012 01:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: Would it be possible for you to provide your make.log? I've attached it to this mail. Here's the root of the problem: checking for Linux build directory... /usr/src/linux-headers-3.1.0-1-686-pae checking for Linux source directory... configure: error: cannot find source directory (please use --with-linux-source) I see that this was already fixed on master with the following commit: -- From 715a77b74caf22e38d1f232d1cc45036b9b83e62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:22:22 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] debian: Look in /lib/modules instead of /usr/src for DKMS kernel sources. DKMS packages usually look in /lib/modules for kernel sources, since that is the standard location, but our packages was looking directly in /usr/src. This fixes the problem. Reported-by: Alban Browaeys pra...@yahoo.com Tested-by: Alban Browaeys pra...@yahoo.com Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com --- AUTHORS |1 + debian/dkms.conf.in |2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/AUTHORS b/AUTHORS index d413523..87b3ccd 100644 --- a/AUTHORS +++ b/AUTHORS @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ provided helpful bug reports or suggestions. Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org Aaron Rosen aro...@clemson.edu Ahmed Bilal numan...@gmail.com +Alban Browaeys pra...@yahoo.com Alex Yipa...@nicira.com Alexey I. Froloff ra...@altlinux.org Bob Ballbob.b...@citrix.com diff --git a/debian/dkms.conf.in b/debian/dkms.conf.in index 56c6398..a6dc316 100644 --- a/debian/dkms.conf.in +++ b/debian/dkms.conf.in @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ PACKAGE_NAME=openvswitch PACKAGE_VERSION=__VERSION__ -MAKE=./configure --with-linux=/usr/src/linux-headers-`uname -r` ; make -C datapath/linux +MAKE=./configure --with-linux=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build ; make -C datapath/linux BUILT_MODULE_NAME[0]=openvswitch_mod BUILT_MODULE_NAME[1]=brcompat_mod BUILT_MODULE_LOCATION[0]=datapath/linux/ -- Somehow this bug fix did not make it to branches for 1.3 or 1.4. I've now cherry-picked it to both branches, so the next Debian upload should incorporate the fix. I see that we should really be using ' instead of ; in the make rule. I sent out a patch. During the course of upgrading XCP from 1.3 to 1.3.2, I've hit 3 bugs already. I really hope that's going to be it! :) I hope so too. I hope that the others have been adequately addressed; let me know if not. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659685: [ovs-dev] Bug#659685: Bug#659685: fails to build the kernel module
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:10:18AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:54:28AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 02/14/2012 01:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: Would it be possible for you to provide your make.log? I've attached it to this mail. Here's the root of the problem: checking for Linux build directory... /usr/src/linux-headers-3.1.0-1-686-pae checking for Linux source directory... configure: error: cannot find source directory (please use --with-linux-source) I see that this was already fixed on master with the following commit: -- From 715a77b74caf22e38d1f232d1cc45036b9b83e62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:22:22 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] debian: Look in /lib/modules instead of /usr/src for DKMS kernel sources. DKMS packages usually look in /lib/modules for kernel sources, since that is the standard location, but our packages was looking directly in /usr/src. This fixes the problem. Reported-by: Alban Browaeys pra...@yahoo.com Tested-by: Alban Browaeys pra...@yahoo.com Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com --- AUTHORS |1 + debian/dkms.conf.in |2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/AUTHORS b/AUTHORS index d413523..87b3ccd 100644 --- a/AUTHORS +++ b/AUTHORS @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ provided helpful bug reports or suggestions. Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org Aaron Rosen aro...@clemson.edu Ahmed Bilal numan...@gmail.com +Alban Browaeys pra...@yahoo.com Alex Yipa...@nicira.com Alexey I. Froloff ra...@altlinux.org Bob Ballbob.b...@citrix.com diff --git a/debian/dkms.conf.in b/debian/dkms.conf.in index 56c6398..a6dc316 100644 --- a/debian/dkms.conf.in +++ b/debian/dkms.conf.in @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ PACKAGE_NAME=openvswitch PACKAGE_VERSION=__VERSION__ -MAKE=./configure --with-linux=/usr/src/linux-headers-`uname -r` ; make -C datapath/linux +MAKE=./configure --with-linux=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build ; make -C datapath/linux BUILT_MODULE_NAME[0]=openvswitch_mod BUILT_MODULE_NAME[1]=brcompat_mod BUILT_MODULE_LOCATION[0]=datapath/linux/ -- Somehow this bug fix did not make it to branches for 1.3 or 1.4. I've now cherry-picked it to both branches, so the next Debian upload should incorporate the fix. I see that we should really be using ' instead of ; in the make rule. I sent out a patch. Thanks Ben, I plan to make make a fresh upload for this. During the course of upgrading XCP from 1.3 to 1.3.2, I've hit 3 bugs already. I really hope that's going to be it! :) I hope so too. I hope that the others have been adequately addressed; let me know if not. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659685: [ovs-dev] Bug#659685: Bug#659685: fails to build the kernel module
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:31:18AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:10:18AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:54:28AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 02/14/2012 01:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: Would it be possible for you to provide your make.log? I've attached it to this mail. Here's the root of the problem: checking for Linux build directory... /usr/src/linux-headers-3.1.0-1-686-pae checking for Linux source directory... configure: error: cannot find source directory (please use --with-linux-source) I see that this was already fixed on master with the following commit: Subject: [PATCH] debian: Look in /lib/modules instead of /usr/src for DKMS kernel sources. DKMS packages usually look in /lib/modules for kernel sources, since that is the standard location, but our packages was looking directly in /usr/src. This fixes the problem. Reported-by: Alban Browaeys pra...@yahoo.com Tested-by: Alban Browaeys pra...@yahoo.com Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com --- Somehow this bug fix did not make it to branches for 1.3 or 1.4. I've now cherry-picked it to both branches, so the next Debian upload should incorporate the fix. I see that we should really be using ' instead of ; in the make rule. I sent out a patch. Thanks Ben, I plan to make make a fresh upload for this. Thanks. It might be wise to hold off for: http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2012-February/014947.html or to plan to make another new upload after it hits. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659685: [ovs-dev] Bug#659685: Bug#659685: fails to build the kernel module
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:35:15PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:31:18AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:10:18AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:54:28AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 02/14/2012 01:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: Would it be possible for you to provide your make.log? I've attached it to this mail. Here's the root of the problem: checking for Linux build directory... /usr/src/linux-headers-3.1.0-1-686-pae checking for Linux source directory... configure: error: cannot find source directory (please use --with-linux-source) I see that this was already fixed on master with the following commit: Subject: [PATCH] debian: Look in /lib/modules instead of /usr/src for DKMS kernel sources. DKMS packages usually look in /lib/modules for kernel sources, since that is the standard location, but our packages was looking directly in /usr/src. This fixes the problem. Reported-by: Alban Browaeys pra...@yahoo.com Tested-by: Alban Browaeys pra...@yahoo.com Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com --- Somehow this bug fix did not make it to branches for 1.3 or 1.4. I've now cherry-picked it to both branches, so the next Debian upload should incorporate the fix. I see that we should really be using ' instead of ; in the make rule. I sent out a patch. Thanks Ben, I plan to make make a fresh upload for this. Thanks. It might be wise to hold off for: http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2012-February/014947.html or to plan to make another new upload after it hits. I am planing to include that patch in my upload. I was not planing to wait for it to hit the git repo but I can if you prefer. I have confirmed that with the patch at the link above and other patches it depends on applied the resulting package installs on my system - though it should be said that the package that is currently present in the archive is also installable on my system. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659685: [ovs-dev] Bug#659685: Bug#659685: fails to build the kernel module
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:16:25PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:35:15PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:31:18AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:10:18AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:54:28AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 02/14/2012 01:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: Would it be possible for you to provide your make.log? I've attached it to this mail. Here's the root of the problem: checking for Linux build directory... /usr/src/linux-headers-3.1.0-1-686-pae checking for Linux source directory... configure: error: cannot find source directory (please use --with-linux-source) I see that this was already fixed on master with the following commit: Subject: [PATCH] debian: Look in /lib/modules instead of /usr/src for DKMS kernel sources. DKMS packages usually look in /lib/modules for kernel sources, since that is the standard location, but our packages was looking directly in /usr/src. This fixes the problem. Reported-by: Alban Browaeys pra...@yahoo.com Tested-by: Alban Browaeys pra...@yahoo.com Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com --- Somehow this bug fix did not make it to branches for 1.3 or 1.4. I've now cherry-picked it to both branches, so the next Debian upload should incorporate the fix. I see that we should really be using ' instead of ; in the make rule. I sent out a patch. Thanks Ben, I plan to make make a fresh upload for this. Thanks. It might be wise to hold off for: http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2012-February/014947.html or to plan to make another new upload after it hits. I am planing to include that patch in my upload. That makes sense. I was not planing to wait for it to hit the git repo but I can if you prefer. I don't think that is necessary. I tested it before I posted it, and you said that you tested it too, and that is good enough for me. I have confirmed that with the patch at the link above and other patches it depends on applied the resulting package installs on my system - though it should be said that the package that is currently present in the archive is also installable on my system. As on mine. Thanks, Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659685: [ovs-dev] Bug#659685: Bug#659685: fails to build the kernel module
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:07:36PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:16:25PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:35:15PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:31:18AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:10:18AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:54:28AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 02/14/2012 01:22 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: Would it be possible for you to provide your make.log? I've attached it to this mail. Here's the root of the problem: checking for Linux build directory... /usr/src/linux-headers-3.1.0-1-686-pae checking for Linux source directory... configure: error: cannot find source directory (please use --with-linux-source) I see that this was already fixed on master with the following commit: Subject: [PATCH] debian: Look in /lib/modules instead of /usr/src for DKMS kernel sources. DKMS packages usually look in /lib/modules for kernel sources, since that is the standard location, but our packages was looking directly in /usr/src. This fixes the problem. Reported-by: Alban Browaeys pra...@yahoo.com Tested-by: Alban Browaeys pra...@yahoo.com Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com --- Somehow this bug fix did not make it to branches for 1.3 or 1.4. I've now cherry-picked it to both branches, so the next Debian upload should incorporate the fix. I see that we should really be using ' instead of ; in the make rule. I sent out a patch. Thanks Ben, I plan to make make a fresh upload for this. Thanks. It might be wise to hold off for: http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2012-February/014947.html or to plan to make another new upload after it hits. I am planing to include that patch in my upload. That makes sense. I was not planing to wait for it to hit the git repo but I can if you prefer. I don't think that is necessary. I tested it before I posted it, and you said that you tested it too, and that is good enough for me. Thanks, I have now uploaded 1.4.0-2. I have confirmed that with the patch at the link above and other patches it depends on applied the resulting package installs on my system - though it should be said that the package that is currently present in the archive is also installable on my system. As on mine. Thanks, Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
