Bug#663577: irssi-scripts-20120326 new release

2012-05-04 Thread Ryan Niebur
Hi Daniel,

On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 07:50:16PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
 Hi Ryan
 
 I updated the copyright file with license information found in the
 header of each script.
 
 I hope all is well now :)

This all looks great, you've even improved accuracy from the previous
copyright file in a few cases. I am uploading the package now.

Thanks for your contribution!

Cheers,
Ryan

-- 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#663577: irssi-scripts-20120326 new release

2012-05-03 Thread Ryan Niebur
Hi Daniel,

On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 01:34:48PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I have reviewed all the scripts from the list, I fix some typos, but
 there are other scripts that have 2 different licenses. Below I show
 you the scripts that were settled and those who need to reviewed
 again.
 
[snip script output]

Thanks for settling these.

 
 [1]: Declare a header with a license and below another license ( is it
 necessary contact the upstream ?)
 Fixed: error found and fixed
 OK: OK
 
 ---
 
 For this case it is necessary to contact the upstream to verify the license?
 

I have looked at many of these and it seems the problem your are
noticing is they have a license text block as a comment at the top,
but the license specified for the %IRSSI settings is not referring
to that specific license.

Since the license setting allows plain text without a standard
format, I beleive that the authors have simply been less precise here
without realizing the potential confusion. As long as they specify the
same type of license, but the block is more precise about the specific
license versions, I think it will be fine for us to just use the
license text block which is more precise and limiting.

 Thank you very much!!
 

Thank you again for your work, and patience, on this!  I may be able
to work on this tonight, but hope to get this uploaded by tomorrow, if
not.

Cheers,
Ryan


-- 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#663577: irssi-scripts-20120326 new release

2012-05-03 Thread Daniel Echeverry
2012/5/3 Ryan Niebur r...@debian.org:
 Hi Daniel,

 On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 01:34:48PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:

 Hi,

 I have reviewed all the scripts from the list, I fix some typos, but
 there are other scripts that have 2 different licenses. Below I show
 you the scripts that were settled and those who need to reviewed
 again.

 [snip script output]

 Thanks for settling these.


 [1]: Declare a header with a license and below another license ( is it
 necessary contact the upstream ?)
 Fixed: error found and fixed
 OK: OK

 ---

 For this case it is necessary to contact the upstream to verify the license?


 I have looked at many of these and it seems the problem your are
 noticing is they have a license text block as a comment at the top,
 but the license specified for the %IRSSI settings is not referring
 to that specific license.

 Since the license setting allows plain text without a standard
 format, I beleive that the authors have simply been less precise here
 without realizing the potential confusion. As long as they specify the
 same type of license, but the block is more precise about the specific
 license versions, I think it will be fine for us to just use the
 license text block which is more precise and limiting.

 Thank you very much!!


 Thank you again for your work, and patience, on this!  I may be able
 to work on this tonight, but hope to get this uploaded by tomorrow, if
 not.

 Cheers,
 Ryan


 --

Hi Ryan

I updated the copyright file with license information found in the
header of each script.

I hope all is well now :)

Thank you very much

-- 
Epsilon
http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry
http://www.rinconinformatico.net
http://enchulatucelu.com
http://www.todopdf.net
http://www.fitnessdeportes.com
http://www.dragonjar.org
Linux user: #477840
Debian user



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#663577: irssi-scripts-20120326 new release

2012-04-29 Thread Daniel Echeverry
2012/4/28 Ryan Niebur r...@debian.org:
 Hello.

 I expect it may require a bit of verification in case there is a bug
 (or if licenses really needed a change), as I have not looked over it
 entirely thoroughly.

 But here is the output of my script:

 DIFF: openurl.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to
 DIFF: fserve.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
 DIFF: xauth.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
 DIFF: noteserve.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to
 DIFF: linkshort.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to
 DIFF: foreach_user.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
 DIFF: nickserv.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
 DIFF: doc.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
 DIFF: fakectcp.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
 DIFF: gpgvalidator.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
 DIFF: xmmsinfo.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
 DIFF: ignore_log.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
 DIFF: dancer_hide_477.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
 DIFF: opnotice.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
 DIFF: fuckem.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
 DIFF: quizgr.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
 DIFF: akftp.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
 DIFF: active_notify.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
 DIFF: modelist-r.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to
 DIFF: autoreminder.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
 DIFF: schwaebisch.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
 DIFF: warnkick.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
 DIFF: phpdoc.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
 DIFF: freenode_filter.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
 DIFF: washnicks.pl changed from GPL-1.0 to
 DIFF: imdb.pl changed from GPL-1.0 to
 DIFF: challenge.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to GPL-2.0+
 DIFF: bitlbee_tab_completion.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to
 DIFF: ixmmsa.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
 DIFF: away_hilight_notice.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
 DIFF: paste_huggie.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
 DIFF: xcmd.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
 DIFF: tvmusor.pl changed from BSD to BSDL
 DIFF: scripthelp.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
 DIFF: ipupdate.pl changed from GPL-1.0 to
 DIFF: kline_warning.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
 DIFF: iMPD.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
 DIFF: wordscramble.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
 DIFF: findbot.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
 DIFF: urlgrab.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
 DIFF: mkick.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to
 DIFF: emaildb1.0.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
 DIFF: quiz.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
 DIFF: active_notice.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to

 On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 02:09:59PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
 [..]

 Hi Ryan.

 Ok, if you want you can send me the modifications that are required,
 and I will make them right away.

 Thank you very much!!


 --
 Epsilon
 http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry
 http://www.rinconinformatico.net
 http://www.fitnessdeportes.com
 http://www.dragonjar.org
 Linux user: #477840
 Debian user

 --

Hi,

I have reviewed all the scripts from the list, I fix some typos, but
there are other scripts that have 2 different licenses. Below I show
you the scripts that were settled and those who need to reviewed
again.

--

DIFF: openurl.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to GPL-2.0  - Fixed
DIFF: fserve.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0  - [1]
DIFF: xauth.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0   - Fixed
DIFF: noteserve.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to- Fixed
DIFF: linkshort.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to- Not found
DIFF: foreach_user.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to- Fixed
DIFF: nickserv.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0- [1]
DIFF: doc.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0 - [1]
DIFF: fakectcp.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0- [1]
DIFF: gpgvalidator.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0- [1]
DIFF: xmmsinfo.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0- [1]
DIFF: ignore_log.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to  - [1]
DIFF: dancer_hide_477.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0 - [1]
DIFF: opnotice.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0- [1]
DIFF: fuckem.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0  - [1]
DIFF: quizgr.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to  - [1]
DIFF: akftp.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0   - [1]
DIFF: active_notify.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to   - [1]
DIFF: modelist-r.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to   - Fixed
DIFF: autoreminder.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0- [1]
DIFF: schwaebisch.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0 - [1]
DIFF: warnkick.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0- [1]
DIFF: phpdoc.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to  - [1]
DIFF: freenode_filter.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0 - [1]
DIFF: washnicks.pl changed from GPL-1.0 to- Fixed
DIFF: imdb.pl changed from GPL-1.0 to - Fixed

Bug#663577: irssi-scripts-20120326 new release

2012-04-28 Thread Ryan Niebur
Hello Daniel,

Your new changes look good.

Since I didn't trust myself to do a thorough reivew of the new
copyright file (it seems like more than a person could reasonably
handle in one sitting), I've written a script which compares it with
the old version, which seems to have noticed some possible
discrepancies. I will make the minor corrections for those tonight, if
needed, before completing my review.

Thanks for the patience, your contributions are appreciated.

Cheers,
Ryan

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 01:05:32PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
 El día 19 de abril de 2012 04:06, Ryan Niebur r...@debian.org escribió:
  Hi Daniel,
 
  Thanks for your work on this, and I apologize for the delay in response.
 
  On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 02:39:10PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
  Hi,
 
  This week I've been working on packaging a new version of irssi-scripts. I
  closed some bugs and updated some of the scripts. I uploaded the package 
  to
  debian mentors. [1]
 
  Additionally, I added a copyright.new in debian/, This file is copyright
  copyright DEP5 Update to 1.0 format.
 
  Could you check out the new version and the new copyright file?
 
 
  I've reviewed your packaging work now and overall it looks really
  good. Though I do wonder, have you used a git repository to track your
  changes? If not, we currently use a repository located here:
  http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/irssi-scripts.git
 
  This would be preferable because it helps to make collaborating and
  reviewing changes easier (this would also replace the need to build
  and upload the source package to mentors). I think it should be okay
  for us to allow you to push changes to the repository there, if you
  want...are you a member of collab-maint on alioth?
 
  Anyways, the only major issue I've noticed is that this detail got
  removed from debian/rules, but the executable permission is relied on
  by the script:
  # log2ansi.pl will run outside irssi, so it needs the executable bit
  chmod +x $D/usr/share/irssi/scripts/log2ansi.pl
  So, we need to set the executable permission on this file during build.
 
  Some other more minor things I noticed are:
 
  The debian/copyright.new file looks very good, however I think the
  GPL-2.0 license definition should replace the text about receiving a
  copy of the license with a reference to /usr/share/common-licenses, as
  you have done with the GPL-2.0+ block. Also, the License:GPL-2.0+ is
  missing a space after the colon. I think it should be fine to replace
  debian/copyright with your debian/copyright.new once these small
  improvements are made.
 
  With regards to dependencies on perl and perl-modules, this is really
  not necessary since the base perl, which is all that is required for
  most scripts, is always installed. In debian/README.Debian there is an
  explanation of how the dependencies are chosen (at least 3 scripts =
  Suggests, at least 20 scripts = Recommends), and it looks like there
  are actually more scripts which depend on libwww-perl than perl or
  perl-modules, from the list in debian/README.Debian. I'm not opposed
  to changing how this is done if there is value added in doing so, but
  if we make that choice we will need to update debian/README.Debian as
  well (and should possibly treat the other dependencies consistently).
  It might be better to just explain the way we do this to the requestor
  of this change instead.
 
  There were a couple patches (go.pl-multiple-networks.diff and
  away.pl.diff) which used to have links to bug reports instead of
  proper headers, and you've replaced those with DEP5 patch headers
  (which is great, thanks!), but I think it could be useful to still
  have the old bug references included within the new DEP5 information.
 
  [1]: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/irssi-scripts/
  irssi-scripts_20120326.dsc
 
  Thank you very much!!
 
 
  No, thank you!
 
  I will be able to sponsor this upload once we address the above
  mentioned items and I do a final review, but first I also want to hear
  back about if and how you want to make use of the git repository for
  collaboration.
 
  Cheers,
  Ryan
 
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
  Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
 
  iEYEARECAAYFAk+P1XwACgkQMihv+PacasXwggCeOmqsvrr2lfcGsBM1VPA2LFxg
  hjEAn1oLlpICofxeicOIMAndpUxkVwok
  =MyTD
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I have fixed all the points you mentioned, and I updated the git
 repository on Alioth,Could you please check out again the package[1]?
 
 Thank You very much!!
 
 [1]: 
 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/irssi-scripts.git;a=summary
 
 
 -- 
 Epsilon
 http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry
 http://www.rinconinformatico.net
 http://www.fitnessdeportes.com
 http://www.dragonjar.org
 Linux user: #477840
 Debian user

-- 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org


Bug#663577: irssi-scripts-20120326 new release

2012-04-28 Thread Daniel Echeverry
2012/4/28 Ryan Niebur r...@debian.org:
 Hello Daniel,

 Your new changes look good.

 Since I didn't trust myself to do a thorough reivew of the new
 copyright file (it seems like more than a person could reasonably
 handle in one sitting), I've written a script which compares it with
 the old version, which seems to have noticed some possible
 discrepancies. I will make the minor corrections for those tonight, if
 needed, before completing my review.

 Thanks for the patience, your contributions are appreciated.

 Cheers,
 Ryan

 On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 01:05:32PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
 El día 19 de abril de 2012 04:06, Ryan Niebur r...@debian.org escribió:
  Hi Daniel,
 
  Thanks for your work on this, and I apologize for the delay in response.
 
  On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 02:39:10PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
  Hi,
 
  This week I've been working on packaging a new version of irssi-scripts. I
  closed some bugs and updated some of the scripts. I uploaded the package 
  to
  debian mentors. [1]
 
  Additionally, I added a copyright.new in debian/, This file is copyright
  copyright DEP5 Update to 1.0 format.
 
  Could you check out the new version and the new copyright file?
 
 
  I've reviewed your packaging work now and overall it looks really
  good. Though I do wonder, have you used a git repository to track your
  changes? If not, we currently use a repository located here:
  http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/irssi-scripts.git
 
  This would be preferable because it helps to make collaborating and
  reviewing changes easier (this would also replace the need to build
  and upload the source package to mentors). I think it should be okay
  for us to allow you to push changes to the repository there, if you
  want...are you a member of collab-maint on alioth?
 
  Anyways, the only major issue I've noticed is that this detail got
  removed from debian/rules, but the executable permission is relied on
  by the script:
  # log2ansi.pl will run outside irssi, so it needs the executable bit
  chmod +x $D/usr/share/irssi/scripts/log2ansi.pl
  So, we need to set the executable permission on this file during build.
 
  Some other more minor things I noticed are:
 
  The debian/copyright.new file looks very good, however I think the
  GPL-2.0 license definition should replace the text about receiving a
  copy of the license with a reference to /usr/share/common-licenses, as
  you have done with the GPL-2.0+ block. Also, the License:GPL-2.0+ is
  missing a space after the colon. I think it should be fine to replace
  debian/copyright with your debian/copyright.new once these small
  improvements are made.
 
  With regards to dependencies on perl and perl-modules, this is really
  not necessary since the base perl, which is all that is required for
  most scripts, is always installed. In debian/README.Debian there is an
  explanation of how the dependencies are chosen (at least 3 scripts =
  Suggests, at least 20 scripts = Recommends), and it looks like there
  are actually more scripts which depend on libwww-perl than perl or
  perl-modules, from the list in debian/README.Debian. I'm not opposed
  to changing how this is done if there is value added in doing so, but
  if we make that choice we will need to update debian/README.Debian as
  well (and should possibly treat the other dependencies consistently).
  It might be better to just explain the way we do this to the requestor
  of this change instead.
 
  There were a couple patches (go.pl-multiple-networks.diff and
  away.pl.diff) which used to have links to bug reports instead of
  proper headers, and you've replaced those with DEP5 patch headers
  (which is great, thanks!), but I think it could be useful to still
  have the old bug references included within the new DEP5 information.
 
  [1]: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/irssi-scripts/
  irssi-scripts_20120326.dsc
 
  Thank you very much!!
 
 
  No, thank you!
 
  I will be able to sponsor this upload once we address the above
  mentioned items and I do a final review, but first I also want to hear
  back about if and how you want to make use of the git repository for
  collaboration.
 
  Cheers,
  Ryan
 
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
  Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
 
  iEYEARECAAYFAk+P1XwACgkQMihv+PacasXwggCeOmqsvrr2lfcGsBM1VPA2LFxg
  hjEAn1oLlpICofxeicOIMAndpUxkVwok
  =MyTD
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 

 Hi,

 I have fixed all the points you mentioned, and I updated the git
 repository on Alioth,Could you please check out again the package[1]?

 Thank You very much!!

 [1]: 
 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/irssi-scripts.git;a=summary


 --
 Epsilon
 http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry
 http://www.rinconinformatico.net
 http://www.fitnessdeportes.com
 http://www.dragonjar.org
 Linux user: #477840
 Debian user

 --

Hi Ryan.

Ok, if you want you can send me the modifications that are required,
and I will make them right away.

Thank 

Bug#663577: irssi-scripts-20120326 new release

2012-04-28 Thread Ryan Niebur
Hello.

I expect it may require a bit of verification in case there is a bug
(or if licenses really needed a change), as I have not looked over it
entirely thoroughly.

But here is the output of my script:

DIFF: openurl.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to
DIFF: fserve.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
DIFF: xauth.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
DIFF: noteserve.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to
DIFF: linkshort.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to
DIFF: foreach_user.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
DIFF: nickserv.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
DIFF: doc.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
DIFF: fakectcp.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
DIFF: gpgvalidator.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
DIFF: xmmsinfo.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
DIFF: ignore_log.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
DIFF: dancer_hide_477.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
DIFF: opnotice.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
DIFF: fuckem.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
DIFF: quizgr.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
DIFF: akftp.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
DIFF: active_notify.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
DIFF: modelist-r.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to
DIFF: autoreminder.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
DIFF: schwaebisch.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
DIFF: warnkick.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
DIFF: phpdoc.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
DIFF: freenode_filter.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
DIFF: washnicks.pl changed from GPL-1.0 to
DIFF: imdb.pl changed from GPL-1.0 to
DIFF: challenge.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to GPL-2.0+
DIFF: bitlbee_tab_completion.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to
DIFF: ixmmsa.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
DIFF: away_hilight_notice.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
DIFF: paste_huggie.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
DIFF: xcmd.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
DIFF: tvmusor.pl changed from BSD to BSDL
DIFF: scripthelp.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
DIFF: ipupdate.pl changed from GPL-1.0 to
DIFF: kline_warning.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
DIFF: iMPD.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
DIFF: wordscramble.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
DIFF: findbot.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-1.0
DIFF: urlgrab.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
DIFF: mkick.pl changed from GPL-2.0 to
DIFF: emaildb1.0.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to
DIFF: quiz.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
DIFF: active_notice.pl changed from GPL-2.0+ to

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 02:09:59PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
[..]
 
 Hi Ryan.
 
 Ok, if you want you can send me the modifications that are required,
 and I will make them right away.
 
 Thank you very much!!
 
 
 -- 
 Epsilon
 http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry
 http://www.rinconinformatico.net
 http://www.fitnessdeportes.com
 http://www.dragonjar.org
 Linux user: #477840
 Debian user

-- 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#663577: irssi-scripts-20120326 new release

2012-04-22 Thread Daniel Echeverry
El día 19 de abril de 2012 04:06, Ryan Niebur r...@debian.org escribió:
 Hi Daniel,

 Thanks for your work on this, and I apologize for the delay in response.

 On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 02:39:10PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
 Hi,

 This week I've been working on packaging a new version of irssi-scripts. I
 closed some bugs and updated some of the scripts. I uploaded the package to
 debian mentors. [1]

 Additionally, I added a copyright.new in debian/, This file is copyright
 copyright DEP5 Update to 1.0 format.

 Could you check out the new version and the new copyright file?


 I've reviewed your packaging work now and overall it looks really
 good. Though I do wonder, have you used a git repository to track your
 changes? If not, we currently use a repository located here:
 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/irssi-scripts.git

 This would be preferable because it helps to make collaborating and
 reviewing changes easier (this would also replace the need to build
 and upload the source package to mentors). I think it should be okay
 for us to allow you to push changes to the repository there, if you
 want...are you a member of collab-maint on alioth?

 Anyways, the only major issue I've noticed is that this detail got
 removed from debian/rules, but the executable permission is relied on
 by the script:
 # log2ansi.pl will run outside irssi, so it needs the executable bit
 chmod +x $D/usr/share/irssi/scripts/log2ansi.pl
 So, we need to set the executable permission on this file during build.

 Some other more minor things I noticed are:

 The debian/copyright.new file looks very good, however I think the
 GPL-2.0 license definition should replace the text about receiving a
 copy of the license with a reference to /usr/share/common-licenses, as
 you have done with the GPL-2.0+ block. Also, the License:GPL-2.0+ is
 missing a space after the colon. I think it should be fine to replace
 debian/copyright with your debian/copyright.new once these small
 improvements are made.

 With regards to dependencies on perl and perl-modules, this is really
 not necessary since the base perl, which is all that is required for
 most scripts, is always installed. In debian/README.Debian there is an
 explanation of how the dependencies are chosen (at least 3 scripts =
 Suggests, at least 20 scripts = Recommends), and it looks like there
 are actually more scripts which depend on libwww-perl than perl or
 perl-modules, from the list in debian/README.Debian. I'm not opposed
 to changing how this is done if there is value added in doing so, but
 if we make that choice we will need to update debian/README.Debian as
 well (and should possibly treat the other dependencies consistently).
 It might be better to just explain the way we do this to the requestor
 of this change instead.

 There were a couple patches (go.pl-multiple-networks.diff and
 away.pl.diff) which used to have links to bug reports instead of
 proper headers, and you've replaced those with DEP5 patch headers
 (which is great, thanks!), but I think it could be useful to still
 have the old bug references included within the new DEP5 information.

 [1]: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/irssi-scripts/
 irssi-scripts_20120326.dsc

 Thank you very much!!


 No, thank you!

 I will be able to sponsor this upload once we address the above
 mentioned items and I do a final review, but first I also want to hear
 back about if and how you want to make use of the git repository for
 collaboration.

 Cheers,
 Ryan

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

 iEYEARECAAYFAk+P1XwACgkQMihv+PacasXwggCeOmqsvrr2lfcGsBM1VPA2LFxg
 hjEAn1oLlpICofxeicOIMAndpUxkVwok
 =MyTD
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-


Hi,

I have fixed all the points you mentioned, and I updated the git
repository on Alioth,Could you please check out again the package[1]?

Thank You very much!!

[1]: 
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/irssi-scripts.git;a=summary


-- 
Epsilon
http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry
http://www.rinconinformatico.net
http://www.fitnessdeportes.com
http://www.dragonjar.org
Linux user: #477840
Debian user



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#663577: irssi-scripts-20120326 new release

2012-04-19 Thread Ryan Niebur
Hi Daniel,

Thanks for your work on this, and I apologize for the delay in response.

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 02:39:10PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
 Hi,
 
 This week I've been working on packaging a new version of irssi-scripts. I
 closed some bugs and updated some of the scripts. I uploaded the package to
 debian mentors. [1]
 
 Additionally, I added a copyright.new in debian/, This file is copyright
 copyright DEP5 Update to 1.0 format.
 
 Could you check out the new version and the new copyright file?
 

I've reviewed your packaging work now and overall it looks really
good. Though I do wonder, have you used a git repository to track your
changes? If not, we currently use a repository located here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/irssi-scripts.git

This would be preferable because it helps to make collaborating and
reviewing changes easier (this would also replace the need to build
and upload the source package to mentors). I think it should be okay
for us to allow you to push changes to the repository there, if you
want...are you a member of collab-maint on alioth?

Anyways, the only major issue I've noticed is that this detail got
removed from debian/rules, but the executable permission is relied on
by the script:
# log2ansi.pl will run outside irssi, so it needs the executable bit
chmod +x $D/usr/share/irssi/scripts/log2ansi.pl
So, we need to set the executable permission on this file during build.

Some other more minor things I noticed are:

The debian/copyright.new file looks very good, however I think the
GPL-2.0 license definition should replace the text about receiving a
copy of the license with a reference to /usr/share/common-licenses, as
you have done with the GPL-2.0+ block. Also, the License:GPL-2.0+ is
missing a space after the colon. I think it should be fine to replace
debian/copyright with your debian/copyright.new once these small
improvements are made.

With regards to dependencies on perl and perl-modules, this is really
not necessary since the base perl, which is all that is required for
most scripts, is always installed. In debian/README.Debian there is an
explanation of how the dependencies are chosen (at least 3 scripts =
Suggests, at least 20 scripts = Recommends), and it looks like there
are actually more scripts which depend on libwww-perl than perl or
perl-modules, from the list in debian/README.Debian. I'm not opposed
to changing how this is done if there is value added in doing so, but
if we make that choice we will need to update debian/README.Debian as
well (and should possibly treat the other dependencies consistently).
It might be better to just explain the way we do this to the requestor
of this change instead.

There were a couple patches (go.pl-multiple-networks.diff and
away.pl.diff) which used to have links to bug reports instead of
proper headers, and you've replaced those with DEP5 patch headers
(which is great, thanks!), but I think it could be useful to still
have the old bug references included within the new DEP5 information.

 [1]: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/irssi-scripts/
 irssi-scripts_20120326.dsc
 
 Thank you very much!!
 

No, thank you!

I will be able to sponsor this upload once we address the above
mentioned items and I do a final review, but first I also want to hear
back about if and how you want to make use of the git repository for
collaboration.

Cheers,
Ryan


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#663577: irssi-scripts-20120326 new release

2012-04-19 Thread Ryan Niebur
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 02:06:04AM -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote:
 
 There were a couple patches (go.pl-multiple-networks.diff and
 away.pl.diff) which used to have links to bug reports instead of
 proper headers, and you've replaced those with DEP5 patch headers
 (which is great, thanks!), but I think it could be useful to still
 have the old bug references included within the new DEP5 information.
 

And of course, I meant DEP3 here..

-- 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#663577: irssi-scripts-20120326 new release

2012-04-13 Thread Daniel Echeverry
Hi,

This week I've been working on packaging a new version of irssi-scripts. I
closed some bugs and updated some of the scripts. I uploaded the package to
debian mentors. [1]

Additionally, I added a copyright.new in debian/, This file is copyright
copyright DEP5 Update to 1.0 format.

Could you check out the new version and the new copyright file?

[1]:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/irssi-scripts/irssi-scripts_20120326.dsc

Thank you very much!!

-- 
Epsilon
http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry
http://www.rinconinformatico.net
http://www.fitnessdeportes.com
http://www.dragonjar.org
Linux user: #477840
Debian user