Bug#665015: Maintaining python-sleekxmpp in DPMT.
What about moving the package in Debian Python Modules Team (DPMT) [0]? I'm willing to migrate the package under the DPMT maintenance, it will, imho, be even better than co-maintaining, I mean the package will benefit from the team maintenance. If it's fine with you, I'll start working on it. [0] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam Cheers, Geoff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665015: Maintaining python-sleekxmpp in DPMT.
Quoting Geoff (2014-02-12 11:58:11) What about moving the package in Debian Python Modules Team (DPMT) [0]? I'm willing to migrate the package under the DPMT maintenance, it will, imho, be even better than co-maintaining, I mean the package will benefit from the team maintenance. If it's fine with you, I'll start working on it. [0] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam Thanks for the offer, but it seems that team uses Subversion, which is not really my cup of tea. If that's a misunderstanding and DPMT is fine using git - and CDBS too - then it is an attractive offer, and will consider joining that team, moving with me a few packages now maintained elsewhere. So please help clarify what are the constraints of the DPMT team. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#665015: Maintaining python-sleekxmpp in DPMT.
On 12/02/2014 13:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Thanks for the offer, but it seems that team uses Subversion, which is not really my cup of tea. Indeed, they use svn, though I've read discussion about possibly migrate to a DVCS. But I don't believe it'll happen in a near future. If that's a misunderstanding and DPMT is fine using git - and CDBS too - then it is an attractive offer, and will consider joining that team, moving with me a few packages now maintained elsewhere. So please help clarify what are the constraints of the DPMT team. Even though they have a strong preference towards dh, there is no official policy against CDBS, some members even use CDBS. I'll keep you inform of any evolution concerning the VCS. Cheers, Geoff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#665015: Maintaining python-sleekxmpp in DPMT.
Quoting Geoff (2014-02-12 13:28:19) On 12/02/2014 13:01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Thanks for the offer, but it seems that team uses Subversion, which is not really my cup of tea. Indeed, they use svn, though I've read discussion about possibly migrate to a DVCS. But I don't believe it'll happen in a near future. If that's a misunderstanding and DPMT is fine using git - and CDBS too - then it is an attractive offer, and will consider joining that team, moving with me a few packages now maintained elsewhere. So please help clarify what are the constraints of the DPMT team. Even though they have a strong preference towards dh, there is no official policy against CDBS, some members even use CDBS. I'll keep you inform of any evolution concerning the VCS. With CDBS merely tolerated, and git only a possible future (might be another DVCS, I suspect), it seems attractive to move it only if I don't move along. If you want that - i.e. a *takeover*, then ok - go ahead. If you want my involvement, DPMT does not seem like a suitable home. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
