Bug#673022: texlive-base: happened with upgrade to 2013.20140123-1 from 2013.20140314-1
Norbert, Yes, I do have texlive-omega installed; here are a few lines from dpkg.log showing it's been installed before this upgrade was made: 2014-02-03 20:57:28 upgrade texlive-omega:all 2013.20131112-1 2013.20131219-1 2014-02-03 21:08:07 configure texlive-omega:all 2013.20131219-1 none 2014-02-03 21:08:10 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20131219-1 2014-02-03 21:08:24 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20131219-1 2014-02-06 11:13:31 upgrade texlive-omega:all 2013.20131219-1 2013.20140123-1 2014-02-06 11:16:02 configure texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 none 2014-02-06 11:16:05 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 2014-02-06 11:16:19 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 2014-03-23 11:03:39 remove texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 none removed only as part of apt-get remove texlive-base to fix install 2014-03-23 11:03:39 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 2014-03-23 11:11:43 install texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 2013.20140314-1 2014-03-23 11:14:37 configure texlive-omega:all 2013.20140314-1 none 2014-03-23 11:14:40 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20140314-1 thanks, --jack From: Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at To: js jsh...@yahoo.com; 673...@bugs.debian.org Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 12:00 AM Subject: Re: Bug#673022: texlive-base: happened with upgrade to 2013.20140123-1 from 2013.20140314-1 Hi, what you reported is a different item, but please wait before opening a new bug, because On Sun, 23 Mar 2014, js wrote: Workaround: I ran apt-get remove texlive-base, followed by an apt-get install of texlive-base and all the other packages removed because of texlive-base. This install from scratch,without a prior version of texlive-base, worked fine. Well, then it is now impossible to reproduce, unless you have some more information about the former state: * did you have texlive-omega installed? * what was the content of /etc/texmf/fmt.d I'll include the zipped file /tmp/fmtutil.3YhQeNol in the next email. Which barfs at: kpathsea: Running mkocp ebcdic.ocp otp2ocp: fatal: File 'ebcdic' not found. The file ebcdic.ocp is in texlive-omega, which also defines the aleph format. So the only ideas I have is: * you had a harddrive problme and parts ofthe installation got missing (- nothing we can work around or do anything) * you have yourself removed parts of the installed files (- nothing we can work around) * you have changed the confirguration in /etc/texmf/fmt.d/ (- nothing we can work around, that is your responsibility) If you cannot give us a recipe to reproduce this error, or more information, I would close a new bug. Thanks for your understanding Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
Bug#673022: texlive-base: happened with upgrade to 2013.20140123-1 from 2013.20140314-1
I forgot to mention: The file ebcdic.ocp is in texlive-omega, which also defines the aleph format. So the only ideas I have is: * you had a harddrive problme and parts ofthe installation got missing (- nothing we can work around or do anything) I don't think this is likely as I tried this install several times, with the same error, but it worked perfectly when I removed texlive-base and reinstalled from scratch * you have yourself removed parts of the installed files (- nothing we can work around) This did not happen as I run debsums --all --changed --generate=missing nightly and can see from the logfile from before the install that no texlive-* packages were affected * you have changed the confirguration in /etc/texmf/fmt.d/ (- nothing we can work around, that is your responsibility) As above, the fact that debsums did not flag this package shows there were no config changes (+ the fact that I only did an apt-get remove texlive, so the following apt-get install would have asked about overriding config files, which it did not). The only thing I have done over and above these (excellent) texlive-* packages is add a package I made myself with the Springer-Verlag Latex macros, which I understand debian cannot package as they provide no copyright information. Perhaps dealing with this unexpected package caused a problem (although it has never caused a problem with previous texlive-base upgrades)? = dpkg --status svjour Package: svjour Status: install ok installed Priority: extra Section: tex Installed-Size: 463 Maintainer: JS jsh...@yahoo.com Architecture: all Version: 3.1.0-5 Depends: texlive-binaries (= 2009) Description: LaTex macros for all Springer journals Contains all the Springer LaTex macros ftp://ftp.springer.de/pub/tex/latex/svjour3/ Homepage: http://www.springer.com/authors/journal+authors/faq+for+journal+authors?SGWID=0-1725015-0-0-0 This package was installed long ago and caused no problems for any previous texlive-base upgrade: 2012-08-12 12:15:33 status installed svjour:all 3.1.0-5 thanks, --jack From: JS jsh...@yahoo.com To: Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at; 673...@bugs.debian.org 673...@bugs.debian.org Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 7:18 AM Subject: Re: Bug#673022: texlive-base: happened with upgrade to 2013.20140123-1 from 2013.20140314-1 Norbert, Yes, I do have texlive-omega installed; here are a few lines from dpkg.log showing it's been installed before this upgrade was made: 2014-02-03 20:57:28 upgrade texlive-omega:all 2013.20131112-1 2013.20131219-1 2014-02-03 21:08:07 configure texlive-omega:all 2013.20131219-1 none 2014-02-03 21:08:10 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20131219-1 2014-02-03 21:08:24 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20131219-1 2014-02-06 11:13:31 upgrade texlive-omega:all 2013.20131219-1 2013.20140123-1 2014-02-06 11:16:02 configure texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 none 2014-02-06 11:16:05 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 2014-02-06 11:16:19 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 2014-03-23 11:03:39 remove texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 none removed only as part of apt-get remove texlive-base to fix install 2014-03-23 11:03:39 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 2014-03-23 11:11:43 install texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 2013.20140314-1 2014-03-23 11:14:37 configure texlive-omega:all 2013.20140314-1 none 2014-03-23 11:14:40 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20140314-1 thanks, --jack From: Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at To: js jsh...@yahoo.com; 673...@bugs.debian.org Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 12:00 AM Subject: Re: Bug#673022: texlive-base: happened with upgrade to 2013.20140123-1 from 2013.20140314-1 Hi, what you reported is a different item, but please wait before opening a new bug, because On Sun, 23 Mar 2014, js wrote: Workaround: I ran apt-get remove texlive-base, followed by an apt-get install of texlive-base and all the other packages removed because of texlive-base. This install from scratch,without a prior version of texlive-base, worked fine. Well, then it is now impossible to reproduce, unless you have some more information about the former state: * did you have texlive-omega installed? * what was the content of /etc/texmf/fmt.d I'll include the zipped file /tmp/fmtutil.3YhQeNol in the next email. Which barfs at: kpathsea: Running mkocp ebcdic.ocp otp2ocp: fatal: File 'ebcdic' not found. The file ebcdic.ocp is in texlive-omega, which also defines the aleph format. So the only ideas I have is: * you had a harddrive problme and parts ofthe installation got missing (- nothing we can work around or do anything) * you have yourself removed parts of the installed files (- nothing we can work around) * you have changed the confirguration in /etc/texmf/fmt.d/ (- nothing we can work around, that is your responsibility) If you cannot give
Bug#673022: texlive-base: happened with upgrade to 2013.20140123-1 from 2013.20140314-1
One more thing I forgot to mention: I run a weekly backup of /etc, so it you think it would be helpful, I can send you a gzip version of /etc/texmf/fmt.d from a few days before the failed upgrade of texlive-base. This would be the /etc/texmf/fmt.d that was in place at the time the texlive-base upgrade failed. thanks, --jack From: JS jsh...@yahoo.com To: Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at; 673...@bugs.debian.org 673...@bugs.debian.org Cc: jsh...@yahoo.com jsh...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 7:32 AM Subject: Re: Bug#673022: texlive-base: happened with upgrade to 2013.20140123-1 from 2013.20140314-1 I forgot to mention: The file ebcdic.ocp is in texlive-omega, which also defines the aleph format. So the only ideas I have is: * you had a harddrive problme and parts ofthe installation got missing (- nothing we can work around or do anything) I don't think this is likely as I tried this install several times, with the same error, but it worked perfectly when I removed texlive-base and reinstalled from scratch * you have yourself removed parts of the installed files (- nothing we can work around) This did not happen as I run debsums --all --changed --generate=missing nightly and can see from the logfile from before the install that no texlive-* packages were affected * you have changed the confirguration in /etc/texmf/fmt.d/ (- nothing we can work around, that is your responsibility) As above, the fact that debsums did not flag this package shows there were no config changes (+ the fact that I only did an apt-get remove texlive, so the following apt-get install would have asked about overriding config files, which it did not). The only thing I have done over and above these (excellent) texlive-* packages is add a package I made myself with the Springer-Verlag Latex macros, which I understand debian cannot package as they provide no copyright information. Perhaps dealing with this unexpected package caused a problem (although it has never caused a problem with previous texlive-base upgrades)? = dpkg --status svjour Package: svjour Status: install ok installed Priority: extra Section: tex Installed-Size: 463 Maintainer: JS jsh...@yahoo.com Architecture: all Version: 3.1.0-5 Depends: texlive-binaries (= 2009) Description: LaTex macros for all Springer journals Contains all the Springer LaTex macros ftp://ftp.springer.de/pub/tex/latex/svjour3/ Homepage: http://www.springer.com/authors/journal+authors/faq+for+journal+authors?SGWID=0-1725015-0-0-0 This package was installed long ago and caused no problems for any previous texlive-base upgrade: 2012-08-12 12:15:33 status installed svjour:all 3.1.0-5 thanks, --jack From: JS jsh...@yahoo.com To: Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at; 673...@bugs.debian.org 673...@bugs.debian.org Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 7:18 AM Subject: Re: Bug#673022: texlive-base: happened with upgrade to 2013.20140123-1 from 2013.20140314-1 Norbert, Yes, I do have texlive-omega installed; here are a few lines from dpkg.log showing it's been installed before this upgrade was made: 2014-02-03 20:57:28 upgrade texlive-omega:all 2013.20131112-1 2013.20131219-1 2014-02-03 21:08:07 configure texlive-omega:all 2013.20131219-1 none 2014-02-03 21:08:10 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20131219-1 2014-02-03 21:08:24 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20131219-1 2014-02-06 11:13:31 upgrade texlive-omega:all 2013.20131219-1 2013.20140123-1 2014-02-06 11:16:02 configure texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 none 2014-02-06 11:16:05 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 2014-02-06 11:16:19 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 2014-03-23 11:03:39 remove texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 none removed only as part of apt-get remove texlive-base to fix install 2014-03-23 11:03:39 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 2014-03-23 11:11:43 install texlive-omega:all 2013.20140123-1 2013.20140314-1 2014-03-23 11:14:37 configure texlive-omega:all 2013.20140314-1 none 2014-03-23 11:14:40 status installed texlive-omega:all 2013.20140314-1 thanks, --jack From: Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at To: js jsh...@yahoo.com; 673...@bugs.debian.org Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 12:00 AM Subject: Re: Bug#673022: texlive-base: happened with upgrade to 2013.20140123-1 from 2013.20140314-1 Hi, what you reported is a different item, but please wait before opening a new bug, because On Sun, 23 Mar 2014, js wrote: Workaround: I ran apt-get remove texlive-base, followed by an apt-get install of texlive-base and all the other packages removed because of texlive-base. This install from scratch,without a prior version of texlive-base, worked fine. Well, then it is now impossible to reproduce, unless you have some more information about the former state: * did you have texlive-omega
Bug#673022: texlive-base: happened with upgrade to 2013.20140123-1 from 2013.20140314-1
Package: texlive-base Followup-For: Bug #673022 Dear Maintainer, =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= * What led up to the situation: During an upgrade texlive-base:all 2013.20140123-1 2013.20140314-1, I got the same error as reported in this bug, so that texlive-base, and all packages dependent on it, failed to get configured: Setting up texlive-base (2013.20140314-1) ... mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST... mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN... mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R... mktexlsr: Done. /usr/bin/tl-paper: setting paper size for dvips to letter. /usr/bin/tl-paper: setting paper size for dvipdfmx to letter. /usr/bin/tl-paper: setting paper size for xdvi to letter. /usr/bin/tl-paper: setting paper size for pdftex to letter. Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done. Building format(s) --all. This may take some time... fmtutil-sys failed. Output has been stored in /tmp/fmtutil.3YhQeNol Please include this file if you report a bug. Workaround: I ran apt-get remove texlive-base, followed by an apt-get install of texlive-base and all the other packages removed because of texlive-base. This install from scratch,without a prior version of texlive-base, worked fine. I'll include the zipped file /tmp/fmtutil.3YhQeNol in the next email. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -- Package-specific info: IMPORTANT INFORMATION: We will only consider bug reports concerning the packaging of TeX Live as relevant. If you have problems with combination of packages in a LaTeX document, please consult your local TeX User Group, the comp.text.tex user group, the author of the original .sty file, or any other help resource. In particular, bugs that are related to up-upstream, i.e., neither Debian nor TeX Live (upstream), but the original package authors, will be closed immediately. *** The Debian TeX Team is *not* a LaTeX Help Desk *** If you report an error when running one of the TeX-related binaries (latex, pdftex, metafont,...), or if the bug is related to bad or wrong output, please include a MINIMAL example input file that produces the error in your report. Please run your example with (pdf)latex -recorder ... (or any other program that supports -recorder) and send us the generated file with the extension .fls, it lists all the files loaded during the run and can easily explain problems induced by outdated files in your home directory. Don't forget to also include minimal examples of other files that are needed, e.g. bibtex databases. Often it also helps to include the logfile. Please, never send included pictures! If your example file isn't short or produces more than one page of output (except when multiple pages are needed to show the problem), you can probably minimize it further. Instructions on how to do that can be found at http://www.minimalbeispiel.de/mini-en.html (english) or http://www.minimalbeispiel.de/mini.html (german) ## minimal input file ## other files ## List of ls-R files 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2969 Mar 23 11:15 /var/lib/texmf/ls-R 4 -rw-rw-r-- 1 root staff 80 Nov 28 12:26 /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 80 Mar 23 11:15 /usr/share/texlive/texmf/ls-R ## Config files 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1656 Mar 23 11:15 /etc/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf 12 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9185 Mar 23 11:15 /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Mar 14 00:52 /usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg - /var/lib/texmf/updmap.cfg-DEBIAN 12 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11141 Mar 23 11:15 /var/lib/texmf/tex/generic/config/language.dat ## Files in /etc/texmf/web2c/ total 8 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 283 Jun 25 2011 mktex.cnf 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1656 Mar 23 11:15 texmf.cnf ## md5sums of texmf.d ca40c66f144b4bafc3e59a2dd32ecb9c /etc/texmf/texmf.d/00debian.cnf d588a08518f705d06ac262acd78f2bc4 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/20xmltex.cnf 8e901c9e6562b73e4ba4d1b4e603412f /etc/texmf/texmf.d/30ptex.bak 055e06548bac99958d8ab2dd1248f2b4 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/80tex4ht.cnf 1df66bc319cec731e202eaf39f5d85e1 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/96JadeTeX.cnf -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/6 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages texlive-base depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.52 ii dpkg 1.17.6 ii libpaper-utils 1.1.24+nmu2 ii luatex 0.76.0-3 ii tex-common 4.04 ii texlive-binaries
Bug#673022: texlive-base: happened with upgrade to 2013.20140123-1 from 2013.20140314-1
The zipped file /tmp/fmtutil.3YhQeNol mentioned below is attached. thanks, --jack From: js jsh...@yahoo.com To: Debian Bug Tracking System 673...@bugs.debian.org Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 1:38 PM Subject: texlive-base: happened with upgrade to 2013.20140123-1 from 2013.20140314-1 Package: texlive-base Followup-For: Bug #673022 Dear Maintainer, =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= * What led up to the situation: During an upgrade texlive-base:all 2013.20140123-1 2013.20140314-1, I got the same error as reported in this bug, so that texlive-base, and all packages dependent on it, failed to get configured: Setting up texlive-base (2013.20140314-1) ... mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST... mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN... mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R... mktexlsr: Done. /usr/bin/tl-paper: setting paper size for dvips to letter. /usr/bin/tl-paper: setting paper size for dvipdfmx to letter. /usr/bin/tl-paper: setting paper size for xdvi to letter. /usr/bin/tl-paper: setting paper size for pdftex to letter. Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done. Building format(s) --all. This may take some time... fmtutil-sys failed. Output has been stored in /tmp/fmtutil.3YhQeNol Please include this file if you report a bug. Workaround: I ran apt-get remove texlive-base, followed by an apt-get install of texlive-base and all the other packages removed because of texlive-base. This install from scratch,without a prior version of texlive-base, worked fine. I'll include the zipped file /tmp/fmtutil.3YhQeNol in the next email. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -- Package-specific info: IMPORTANT INFORMATION: We will only consider bug reports concerning the packaging of TeX Live as relevant. If you have problems with combination of packages in a LaTeX document, please consult your local TeX User Group, the comp.text.tex user group, the author of the original .sty file, or any other help resource. In particular, bugs that are related to up-upstream, i.e., neither Debian nor TeX Live (upstream), but the original package authors, will be closed immediately. *** The Debian TeX Team is *not* a LaTeX Help Desk *** If you report an error when running one of the TeX-related binaries (latex, pdftex, metafont,...), or if the bug is related to bad or wrong output, please include a MINIMAL example input file that produces the error in your report. Please run your example with (pdf)latex -recorder ... (or any other program that supports -recorder) and send us the generated file with the extension .fls, it lists all the files loaded during the run and can easily explain problems induced by outdated files in your home directory. Don't forget to also include minimal examples of other files that are needed, e.g. bibtex databases. Often it also helps to include the logfile. Please, never send included pictures! If your example file isn't short or produces more than one page of output (except when multiple pages are needed to show the problem), you can probably minimize it further. Instructions on how to do that can be found at http://www.minimalbeispiel.de/mini-en.html (english) or http://www.minimalbeispiel.de/mini.html (german) ## minimal input file ## other files ## List of ls-R files 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2969 Mar 23 11:15 /var/lib/texmf/ls-R 4 -rw-rw-r-- 1 root staff 80 Nov 28 12:26 /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 80 Mar 23 11:15 /usr/share/texlive/texmf/ls-R ## Config files 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1656 Mar 23 11:15 /etc/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf 12 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9185 Mar 23 11:15 /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Mar 14 00:52 /usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg - /var/lib/texmf/updmap.cfg-DEBIAN 12 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11141 Mar 23 11:15 /var/lib/texmf/tex/generic/config/language.dat ## Files in /etc/texmf/web2c/ total 8 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 283 Jun 25 2011 mktex.cnf 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1656 Mar 23 11:15 texmf.cnf ## md5sums of texmf.d ca40c66f144b4bafc3e59a2dd32ecb9c /etc/texmf/texmf.d/00debian.cnf d588a08518f705d06ac262acd78f2bc4 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/20xmltex.cnf 8e901c9e6562b73e4ba4d1b4e603412f /etc/texmf/texmf.d/30ptex.bak 055e06548bac99958d8ab2dd1248f2b4 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/80tex4ht.cnf 1df66bc319cec731e202eaf39f5d85e1 /etc/texmf/texmf.d/96JadeTeX.cnf -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/6 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US,
Bug#673022: texlive-base: happened with upgrade to 2013.20140123-1 from 2013.20140314-1
On 23.03.14 js (jsh...@yahoo.com) wrote: Hi, Package: texlive-base Followup-For: Bug #673022 During an upgrade texlive-base:all 2013.20140123-1 2013.20140314-1, I got the same error as reported in this bug, so that texlive-base, and all packages dependent on it, failed to get configured: No, this is a new issue. Please open a new bug for it. Could you try if installing texlive-omega solves your problem? Hilmar -- sigmentation fault signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#673022: texlive-base: happened with upgrade to 2013.20140123-1 from 2013.20140314-1
Hi, what you reported is a different item, but please wait before opening a new bug, because On Sun, 23 Mar 2014, js wrote: Workaround: I ran apt-get remove texlive-base, followed by an apt-get install of texlive-base and all the other packages removed because of texlive-base. This install from scratch,without a prior version of texlive-base, worked fine. Well, then it is now impossible to reproduce, unless you have some more information about the former state: * did you have texlive-omega installed? * what was the content of /etc/texmf/fmt.d I'll include the zipped file /tmp/fmtutil.3YhQeNol in the next email. Which barfs at: kpathsea: Running mkocp ebcdic.ocp otp2ocp: fatal: File 'ebcdic' not found. The file ebcdic.ocp is in texlive-omega, which also defines the aleph format. So the only ideas I have is: * you had a harddrive problme and parts ofthe installation got missing (- nothing we can work around or do anything) * you have yourself removed parts of the installed files (- nothing we can work around) * you have changed the confirguration in /etc/texmf/fmt.d/ (- nothing we can work around, that is your responsibility) If you cannot give us a recipe to reproduce this error, or more information, I would close a new bug. Thanks for your understanding Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
