Bug#685327: qa.debian.org: report packager on package migration fail
Hi Ritesh, I agree with what Ricardo Mones wrote on 20 Aug 2012 on this bug. I prefer that no additional e-mails are sent to me related to the migrations from unstable to testing. (Actually I don't know how to unsubscribe to the existing e-mails.) I agree with Paul Wise about a simple solution with grep-excuses, and that this bug should just be closed. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#685327: qa.debian.org: report packager on package migration fail
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 03:03:33PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Monday 20 August 2012 01:18 PM, Ricardo Mones wrote: > > Mail is already sent when a package migrates succesfully, so absence of > > such mail on the expected time should give you a hint. > > > > The situations you describe already grant very likely you have received > > an RC bug mail describing the problem. You already know an RC bug will > > prevent your package from migrating, so another mail telling the obvious > > is just useless IMO. > > It won't hurt to receive an extra email. That's just because you still don't receive enough. Not everybody is so lucky ;) > No. Migration blockages are not always due to RC bugs. I filed this > report because I got hit by this. My package, open-iscsi, was blocked > because its dependent package, scsi-modules provided by the kernel, > recently stopped building on all architectures. > > For this situation, I never got an email. So, please, if it can be done, > it'll be good. Sure, and not receiving it 10 days after uploading should have been a hint something was wrong, as said. Anyway that's a matter of preferences. As long as implementation is opt-in only it will be good. regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.Richard Feynman signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#685327: qa.debian.org: report packager on package migration fail
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > When a package is uploaded to unstable, after the 10 day window it > automatically migrates to testing. > > If there are issues (which could be bug reports, or unsatisfied > packages, or policy violations), the package does not migrate. It would > be helpful that under such scenarios, the packager is sent an email > about the migration failure. I would think this is something for the release team's scripts. I asked about it on the IRC channel of the release team and was told that you should just run this in crontab `grep-excuses 'Ritesh Raj Sarraf'`. I guess this bug should just be closed. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#685327: qa.debian.org: report packager on package migration fail
On Monday 20 August 2012 01:18 PM, Ricardo Mones wrote: > Mail is already sent when a package migrates succesfully, so absence of > such mail on the expected time should give you a hint. > > The situations you describe already grant very likely you have received > an RC bug mail describing the problem. You already know an RC bug will > prevent your package from migrating, so another mail telling the obvious > is just useless IMO. It won't hurt to receive an extra email. No. Migration blockages are not always due to RC bugs. I filed this report because I got hit by this. My package, open-iscsi, was blocked because its dependent package, scsi-modules provided by the kernel, recently stopped building on all architectures. For this situation, I never got an email. So, please, if it can be done, it'll be good. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#685327: qa.debian.org: report packager on package migration fail
Hi, On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:54:35PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > When a package is uploaded to unstable, after the 10 day window it > automatically migrates to testing. > > If there are issues (which could be bug reports, or unsatisfied > packages, or policy violations), the package does not migrate. It would > be helpful that under such scenarios, the packager is sent an email > about the migration failure. Mail is already sent when a package migrates succesfully, so absence of such mail on the expected time should give you a hint. The situations you describe already grant very likely you have received an RC bug mail describing the problem. You already know an RC bug will prevent your package from migrating, so another mail telling the obvious is just useless IMO. regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ bash: ./signature: No such file or directory /bin/bash signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#685327: qa.debian.org: report packager on package migration fail
On 20/08/12 at 23:54 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > When a package is uploaded to unstable, after the 10 day window it > automatically migrates to testing. > > If there are issues (which could be bug reports, or unsatisfied > packages, or policy violations), the package does not migrate. It would > be helpful that under such scenarios, the packager is sent an email > about the migration failure. Hi, While it is not implemented, a nice and fairly easy way to fix that could be to add an RSS feed output on http://udd.debian.org/dmd.cgi ... (patch welcomed) Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#685327: qa.debian.org: report packager on package migration fail
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist When a package is uploaded to unstable, after the 10 day window it automatically migrates to testing. If there are issues (which could be bug reports, or unsatisfied packages, or policy violations), the package does not migrate. It would be helpful that under such scenarios, the packager is sent an email about the migration failure. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (100, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
