Bug#689857: Please suggest winbind
On 10/07/2012 12:51 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Thomas Hood (jdth...@gmail.com): >> The Description mentions: >> >> For use in an NT4 domain or Active Directory realm, >> you will also need the winbind package. >> >> Should winbind be included on the "Suggests:" line? > > Well, there are many use cases where there is no need for winbind, > particularly when the samba server is a domain controller or a > standalone server, or a print server. > > So, I'm not convinced that it is a good idea to suggest winbind. I think it's a good idea to include it in Suggests, Christian's arguments make sense for not including it in Recommends though. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#689857: Please suggest winbind
Quoting Thomas Hood (jdth...@gmail.com): > Package: Samba > Version: 2:3.6.6-3 > Severity: wishlist > > The Description mentions: > > For use in an NT4 domain or Active Directory realm, > you will also need the winbind package. > > Should winbind be included on the "Suggests:" line? Well, there are many use cases where there is no need for winbind, particularly when the samba server is a domain controller or a standalone server, or a print server. So, I'm not convinced that it is a good idea to suggest winbind. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#689857: Please suggest winbind
Package: Samba Version: 2:3.6.6-3 Severity: wishlist The Description mentions: For use in an NT4 domain or Active Directory realm, you will also need the winbind package. Should winbind be included on the "Suggests:" line? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
