Bug#690036: unblock: rabbitmq-server/2.8.7-1
Hi there, it would be rather important to unblock a more recent release, as Rabbitmq 2.8.4 seems to have a rather annoying bug that makes it impossible to run chef-server on Wheezy. http://tickets.opscode.com/browse/CHEF-3256 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.rabbitmq.general/17120 This bug seems to be fixed in Rabbitmq 2.8.5 and a bump to 3.0 would probably provide a lot more fixes. What has to be done for this unblock to be possible? Thanks Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690036: unblock: rabbitmq-server/2.8.7-1
On 14.12.2012 10:06, Alexander Pabst wrote: it would be rather important to unblock a more recent release, as Rabbitmq 2.8.4 seems to have a rather annoying bug that makes it impossible to run chef-server on Wheezy. There don't seem to be any bugs relating to that filed against the Debian packages as far as I can see? (I'd expect there to be if it is actually impossible.) http://tickets.opscode.com/browse/CHEF-3256 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.rabbitmq.general/17120 This bug seems to be fixed in Rabbitmq 2.8.5 and a bump to 3.0 would probably provide a lot more fixes. What has to be done for this unblock to be possible? The size of the diff makes an unblock infeasible, as has already been indicated. If there are particular issues that need fixing in wheezy then someone would need to look at preparing a testing-proposed-updates upload for those, and open a new bug to discuss that. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690036: unblock: rabbitmq-server/2.8.7-1
Hi Adam, On 12/11/12 16:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote: 328 files changed, 14670 insertions(+), 11824 deletions(-) I've just compared tags rabbitmq_v2_8_4 and rabbitmq_v2_8_7 with mercurial using all released repositories hosted at hg.rabbitmq.com but was unable to get similar numbers: 97 files changed, 1388 insertions, 1798 deletions Comparing the orig.tar.gz files for 2.8.4 and 2.8.7 produce different results, but also not as high: 116 files changed, 4196 insertions(+), 1115 deletions(-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690036: unblock: rabbitmq-server/2.8.7-1
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 15:41 +, Emile Joubert wrote:
On 12/11/12 16:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
328 files changed, 14670 insertions(+), 11824 deletions(-)
I've just compared tags rabbitmq_v2_8_4 and rabbitmq_v2_8_7 with
mercurial using all released repositories hosted at hg.rabbitmq.com but
was unable to get similar numbers:
97 files changed, 1388 insertions, 1798 deletions
Comparing the orig.tar.gz files for 2.8.4 and 2.8.7 produce different
results, but also not as high:
116 files changed, 4196 insertions(+), 1115 deletions(-)
I've just re-compared the source packages as uploaded to the Debian
archive, and (predictably) get exactly the same result. Attached is the
result of
debdiff ftp/pool/main/r/rabbitmq-server/rabbitmq-server_2.8.{4,7}-1.dsc
| diffstat.
Regards,
Adam
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/mochiweb-wrapper/mochiweb-git/rebar
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/docs/http-headers-status-v3.png
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/priv/trace/http-headers-status-v3.png
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/rebar
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/favicon.ico
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/WM200-crop.png
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/basho-landscape.gif
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/basic-trace-decision-tab.png
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/basic-trace-labeled.png
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/basic-trace-request-tab.png
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/basic-trace-response-tab.png
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/bg.gif
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/blankbox.gif
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/chash.gif
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/easy-ops.gif
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/gossip4.gif
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/halfblankbox.gif
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/http-headers-status-v3.png
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/more.gif
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/site.gif
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/splash250.gif
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-git/www/images/vclock.gif
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-hg/docs/http-headers-status-v3.png
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-hg/priv/trace/http-headers-status-v3.png
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-hg/rebar
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-hg/www/favicon.ico
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-hg/www/images/WM200-crop.png
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-hg/www/images/basho-landscape.gif
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-hg/www/images/basic-trace-decision-tab.png
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-hg/www/images/basic-trace-labeled.png
|binary
/tmp/9BtKnDLILC/rabbitmq-server-2.8.7/plugins-src/webmachine-wrapper/webmachine-hg/www/images/basic-trace-request-tab.png
|binary
Bug#690036: unblock: rabbitmq-server/2.8.7-1
Hi Adam,
On 13/11/12 15:48, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
debdiff ftp/pool/main/r/rabbitmq-server/rabbitmq-server_2.8.{4,7}-1.dsc
| diffstat.
Thanks for explaining. The different statistics are mostly due to
webmachine and mochiweb. These are dependencies of a subset of rabbitmq
plugins that had to be upgraded in order to solve a bug. Webmachine
also moved from bitbucket to github during the period in question.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690036: unblock: rabbitmq-server/2.8.7-1
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 12:04 +0100, Emile Joubert wrote: We would be grateful if you consider unblocking version 2.8.7. The differences between 2.8.4 and 2.8.7 only include bugfixes, as noted in the changelog: http://www.rabbitmq.com/changelog.html 328 files changed, 14670 insertions(+), 11824 deletions(-) That's an awful lot of bug fixes for a few revisions on a stable branch. It's also not particularly reviewable. Why was the changelog entry for 2.8.4-1 removed? The 2.8.x releases were made from a stable branch. The most important fixes are to High Availability mode of operation. All of the changes in question were made upstream. It would be very unfortunate if 2.8.4 was accepted instead, because it is halfway down a stable branch of development. Halfway down a stable branch of development sounds a little odd. Isn't the point of a stable branch that it only receives bug fixes, rather than new development? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690036: unblock: rabbitmq-server/2.8.7-1
Hi Adam, thanks for reviewing. On 12/11/12 16:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote: 328 files changed, 14670 insertions(+), 11824 deletions(-) That's an awful lot of bug fixes for a few revisions on a stable branch. That represents bugfixes over the last 3 releases for this package. The most important bugfixes that we are especially keen for users to get relate to High Availability (HA) mode of operation. It's also not particularly reviewable. The changes can be reviewed by checking out with mercurial: $ hg clone http://hg.rabbitmq.com/rabbitmq-public-umbrella $ make -C rabbitmq-public-umbrella checkout And then performing a comparison for each repository, e.g. $ cd rabbitmq-public-umbrella/rabbitmq-server $ hg diff -r rabbitmq_v2_8_4 -r rabbitmq_v2_8_7 Why was the changelog entry for 2.8.4-1 removed? That was a mistake. It should say * New upstream release. Halfway down a stable branch of development sounds a little odd. Isn't the point of a stable branch that it only receives bug fixes, rather than new development? The rabbitmq_v2_8_x branch only received backported bugfixes over the last 7 releases. Please let me know if there is any more information I can provide to help your review. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#690036: unblock: rabbitmq-server/2.8.7-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package rabbitmq-server We would be grateful if you consider unblocking version 2.8.7. The differences between 2.8.4 and 2.8.7 only include bugfixes, as noted in the changelog: http://www.rabbitmq.com/changelog.html For 2.8.5: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-announce/attachments/20120802/e4ad3dd3/attachment.txt For 2.8.6: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-announce/attachments/20120822/21528820/attachment.txt For 2.8.7: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-announce/attachments/20120927/ffd77c7c/attachment.txt The 2.8.x releases were made from a stable branch. The most important fixes are to High Availability mode of operation. All of the changes in question were made upstream. It would be very unfortunate if 2.8.4 was accepted instead, because it is halfway down a stable branch of development. unblock rabbitmq-server/2.8.7-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
