Bug#695056: [Xen-devel] [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#695056: xen - Missing support for XZ compressed bzimage kernels

2012-12-19 Thread Jan Beulich
 On 04.12.12 at 11:12, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
 On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 09:51 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
  On 04.12.12 at 10:33, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
  On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 19:47 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
  Package: src:xen
  Version: 4.1.3-4
  Severity: serious
  
  The bzimage loader used in both libxc and the hypervisor lacks XZ
  support. Debian kernels since 3.6 are compressed with XZ and can't be
  loaded.
  
  Support for XZ compression was added in changeset 23002:eb64b8f8eebb
  somewhere last year.
  
  Indeed. Jan this would be a good candidate for a future 4.1.x I think
  (it was already in 4.2.0).
 
 Hmm, I'm not really convinced - we're at 4.1.4 (I'm looking
 towards an RC2 followed by a release within the next days),
 and doing a feature addition like this in a .5 stable release
 looks questionable to me in the context of how we managed
 stable updates in the past. But I'm open to be outvoted of
 course...
 
 My thinking was that it is a reasonably self contained patch (most of
 the code is the new files) and without it people won't be able to use
 4.1.x with their distro kernels at all, so it's something between a bug
 fix and a new feature.

Just did this on the hypervisor side (i.e. for Dom0). Unless told
otherwise I'm going to assume that IanJ will take care of the
DomU (tools side) part.

Jan


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#695056: [Xen-devel] [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#695056: xen - Missing support for XZ compressed bzimage kernels

2012-12-19 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 11:33 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
  On 04.12.12 at 11:12, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
  On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 09:51 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
   On 04.12.12 at 10:33, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
   On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 19:47 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
   Package: src:xen
   Version: 4.1.3-4
   Severity: serious
   
   The bzimage loader used in both libxc and the hypervisor lacks XZ
   support. Debian kernels since 3.6 are compressed with XZ and can't be
   loaded.
   
   Support for XZ compression was added in changeset 23002:eb64b8f8eebb
   somewhere last year.
   
   Indeed. Jan this would be a good candidate for a future 4.1.x I think
   (it was already in 4.2.0).
  
  Hmm, I'm not really convinced - we're at 4.1.4 (I'm looking
  towards an RC2 followed by a release within the next days),
  and doing a feature addition like this in a .5 stable release
  looks questionable to me in the context of how we managed
  stable updates in the past. But I'm open to be outvoted of
  course...
  
  My thinking was that it is a reasonably self contained patch (most of
  the code is the new files) and without it people won't be able to use
  4.1.x with their distro kernels at all, so it's something between a bug
  fix and a new feature.
 
 Just did this on the hypervisor side (i.e. for Dom0). Unless told
 otherwise I'm going to assume that IanJ will take care of the
 DomU (tools side) part.

Which FWIW is 23002:eb64b8f8eebb but it very likely requires portions of
23021:da7c950772ed, 23322:d9982136d8fa and 26115:37a8946eeb9d which are
fixes (some security sensitive) in that code.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Campbell
Current Noise: Katatonia - The Longest Year

Staff meeting in the conference room in %d minutes.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#695056: [Xen-devel] [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#695056: xen - Missing support for XZ compressed bzimage kernels

2012-12-04 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 09:51 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
  On 04.12.12 at 10:33, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
  On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 19:47 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
  Package: src:xen
  Version: 4.1.3-4
  Severity: serious
  
  The bzimage loader used in both libxc and the hypervisor lacks XZ
  support. Debian kernels since 3.6 are compressed with XZ and can't be
  loaded.
  
  Support for XZ compression was added in changeset 23002:eb64b8f8eebb
  somewhere last year.
  
  Indeed. Jan this would be a good candidate for a future 4.1.x I think
  (it was already in 4.2.0).
 
 Hmm, I'm not really convinced - we're at 4.1.4 (I'm looking
 towards an RC2 followed by a release within the next days),
 and doing a feature addition like this in a .5 stable release
 looks questionable to me in the context of how we managed
 stable updates in the past. But I'm open to be outvoted of
 course...

My thinking was that it is a reasonably self contained patch (most of
the code is the new files) and without it people won't be able to use
4.1.x with their distro kernels at all, so it's something between a bug
fix and a new feature.

If distros are going to be backporting it anyway they may as well all
get it from us.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Campbell
Current Noise: Anthrax - Stealing From A Thief

Getting there is only half as far as getting there and back.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#695056: [Xen-devel] [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#695056: xen - Missing support for XZ compressed bzimage kernels

2012-12-04 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:12:16AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
 On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 09:51 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
   On 04.12.12 at 10:33, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
   On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 19:47 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
   Package: src:xen
   Version: 4.1.3-4
   Severity: serious
   
   The bzimage loader used in both libxc and the hypervisor lacks XZ
   support. Debian kernels since 3.6 are compressed with XZ and can't be
   loaded.
   
   Support for XZ compression was added in changeset 23002:eb64b8f8eebb
   somewhere last year.
   
   Indeed. Jan this would be a good candidate for a future 4.1.x I think
   (it was already in 4.2.0).
  
  Hmm, I'm not really convinced - we're at 4.1.4 (I'm looking
  towards an RC2 followed by a release within the next days),
  and doing a feature addition like this in a .5 stable release
  looks questionable to me in the context of how we managed
  stable updates in the past. But I'm open to be outvoted of
  course...
 
 My thinking was that it is a reasonably self contained patch (most of
 the code is the new files) and without it people won't be able to use
 4.1.x with their distro kernels at all, so it's something between a bug
 fix and a new feature.
 
 If distros are going to be backporting it anyway they may as well all
 get it from us.
 

+1


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org