Bug#701308: pam-unix2 no longer build with latest glibc headers
Hi Petter, On Mon, Jul 01, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > Hi, Thorsten. > > I was looking at a build failure for libpam-unix2 in the latest Debian > build environment, and discovered that the problem is that it is using a > set of lock macros no longer provided by libc. I fetched the latest > version from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/kukuk/pam/pam_unix2/ >. Didn't know that this directory exists again ... > This is the build error with version 2.6: > Perhaps time to make a new release? There were some newer releases, all can be found in the openSUSE project: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Linux-PAM/pam-modules But yes, the lock-problem is only solved with a patch, too. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk, Project Manager/Release Manager SLES SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#701308: pam-unix2 no longer build with latest glibc headers
[Thorsten Kukuk] > > Hi, Thorsten. > > > > I was looking at a build failure for libpam-unix2 in the latest Debian > > build environment, and discovered that the problem is that it is using a > > set of lock macros no longer provided by libc. I fetched the latest > > version from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/kukuk/pam/pam_unix2/ >. > > Didn't know that this directory exists again ... Hehe. Is there a better upstream source for the package? > There were some newer releases, all can be found in the openSUSE > project: > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Linux-PAM/pam-modules > > But yes, the lock-problem is only solved with a patch, too. Perhaps time to wrap up a new release with all the patches in place? Note, the Debian package got some security fixes for the pam_prompt() and pam_syslog() handling. Check the source via http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-unix2.html >. You might want to include them too in a new release. -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#701308: pam-unix2 no longer build with latest glibc headers
Hi, Thorsten. I was looking at a build failure for libpam-unix2 in the latest Debian build environment, and discovered that the problem is that it is using a set of lock macros no longer provided by libc. I fetched the latest version from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/kukuk/pam/pam_unix2/ >. This is the build error with version 2.6: read-files.c: In function 'files_getspnam_r': read-files.c:344:3: warning: implicit declaration of function '__libc_lock_define_initialized' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] read-files.c:344:35: error: expected expression before 'static' read-files.c:345:3: error: expected ';' before 'enum' read-files.c:348:3: warning: implicit declaration of function '__libc_lock_lock' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] read-files.c:348:21: error: 'lock' undeclared (first use in this function) read-files.c:348:21: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in read-files.c:350:3: error: 'status' undeclared (first use in this function) read-files.c:364:3: warning: implicit declaration of function '__libc_lock_unlock' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] read-files.c: In function 'files_getpwnam_r': read-files.c:374:35: error: expected expression before 'static' read-files.c:375:3: error: expected ';' before 'enum' read-files.c:378:21: error: 'lock' undeclared (first use in this function) read-files.c:380:3: error: 'status' undeclared (first use in this function) read-files.c:397:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] read-files.c: In function 'files_getspnam_r': read-files.c:367:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] Perhaps time to make a new release? If you consider making a new release, please see if some of the Debian patches available from http://sources.debian.net/src/libpam-unix2/1:2.4.1-6/debian/patches > should be included. All of them seem to apply cleanly to 2.6 even if they were written for 2.4.1. Information about the Debian package is available from http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-unix2.html >. -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
