Bug#702115: libsocialweb/0.25.20-3.1
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 08:57:02PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Control: tag -1 + moreinfo On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 05:46:07AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: libsocialweb package in testing has a security bug as CVE-2012-4511, and I've cherry-picked a patch from upstream as just 1 liner one. Please consider to unblock libsocialweb. The diff from testing to sid is not just your security fix: | Base version: libsocialweb_0.25.20-2 from testing | Target version: libsocialweb_0.25.20-3.1 from unstable If you want an isolated fix for the security issue it will have to go through t-p-u. I only glanced at the diff for sid, but it looks unsuitable at this stage (adding vala bindings, for example). Ping? -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#702115: libsocialweb/0.25.20-3.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock libsocialweb package in testing has a security bug as CVE-2012-4511, and I've cherry-picked a patch from upstream as just 1 liner one. Please consider to unblock libsocialweb. libsocialweb.debdiff Description: Binary data
Bug#702115: libsocialweb/0.25.20-3.1
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 05:46:07AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: libsocialweb package in testing has a security bug as CVE-2012-4511, and I've cherry-picked a patch from upstream as just 1 liner one. Please consider to unblock libsocialweb. The diff from testing to sid is not just your security fix: | Base version: libsocialweb_0.25.20-2 from testing | Target version: libsocialweb_0.25.20-3.1 from unstable If you want an isolated fix for the security issue it will have to go through t-p-u. I only glanced at the diff for sid, but it looks unsuitable at this stage (adding vala bindings, for example). -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits signature.asc Description: Digital signature
