Bug#702122: mirrors: add debian-mirror.sakura.ne.jp to syncproxy leaf

2016-03-07 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013, Hideki Yamane wrote:

> 
>  Some of you may know, I've started debian-mirror.sakura.ne.jp.
>  
> http://henrich-on-debian.blogspot.com/2013/02/introducing-debian-mirrorsakuranejp.html
> 
>  Now it is pushed-mirror under hanzubon.jp, and I think it's better to be 
> pushed 
>  from upstream syncproxy if we can.

Is this request still standing?

The closes syncproxy to .jp would be in the US, syncproxy2.wna.debian.org

-- 
|  .''`.   ** Debian **
  Peter Palfrader   | : :' :  The  universal
 https://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'  Operating System
|   `-https://www.debian.org/



Bug#702122: mirrors: add debian-mirror.sakura.ne.jp to syncproxy leaf

2013-03-06 Thread Simon Paillard
Hi,

Sorry for the late reply.

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 06:33:14PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> I don't think it is good idea. Because synxproxy to Japan trans
> pacific network connection bandwidth is narrow (~ 5Mbps).

A little test shows ~5MBytes/s i.e. 40Mbps (as of now).
 
> If you want to setup some kind of redundancy of push primary in Japan,
> we should build some kind of pushproxy and management system of
> primary pusy mirror backend.

Could you please check what you want to do on your side, before we configure 
the push ?

For push setup, we need:
- you to record your mirror at http://www.debian.org/mirror/submit
- a hostname/user/port for the SSH trigger

Then we'll provide you a rsync access (though you may use the same as hanzubon).

Best regards.
 
> > Hideki Yamane  wrote:
> >>
> >>  Some of you may know, I've started debian-mirror.sakura.ne.jp.
> >>  
> >> http://henrich-on-debian.blogspot.com/2013/02/introducing-debian-mirrorsakuranejp.html
> >>
> >>  Now it is pushed-mirror under hanzubon.jp, and I think it's better to be 
> >> pushed 
> >>  from upstream syncproxy if we can.
> >>
> >>  The reason is, sakura mirror and other mirrors pushed from hanzubon.jp is 
> >> providing
> >>  ftp.jp.debian.org. ftp.jp.d.o has some robustness mechanism that if 
> >> primary one goes
> >>  down or not sync some days and be obsolete, then DNS entry will switch to 
> >> point 
> >>  another mirror. However, if hanzubon.jp archive will stop or be 
> >> corrupted, then 
> >>  **all** of those mirrors are same state. If sakura mirror can get updated 
> >> archives
> >>  from syncproxy, ftp.jp.d.o get more robustness IMO.
> >>
> >>  Could you consider to add sakura mirror as syncproxy leaf, please?
 

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#702122: mirrors: add debian-mirror.sakura.ne.jp to syncproxy leaf

2013-03-04 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi

I don't think it is good idea. Because synxproxy to Japan trans
pacific network connection bandwidth is narrow (~ 5Mbps).

If you want to setup some kind of redundancy of push primary in Japan,
we should build some kind of pushproxy and management system of
primary pusy mirror backend.

> In <20130303075058.c44c71f5a6785883bddec...@debian.or.jp> 
>   Hideki Yamane  wrote:
>> Package: mirrors
>> Severity: normal
>> X-debbugs-CC: debian-mirr...@lists.debian.org, bo...@debian.or.jp
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>  Some of you may know, I've started debian-mirror.sakura.ne.jp.
>>  
>> http://henrich-on-debian.blogspot.com/2013/02/introducing-debian-mirrorsakuranejp.html
>>
>>  Now it is pushed-mirror under hanzubon.jp, and I think it's better to be 
>> pushed 
>>  from upstream syncproxy if we can.
>>
>>  The reason is, sakura mirror and other mirrors pushed from hanzubon.jp is 
>> providing
>>  ftp.jp.debian.org. ftp.jp.d.o has some robustness mechanism that if primary 
>> one goes
>>  down or not sync some days and be obsolete, then DNS entry will switch to 
>> point 
>>  another mirror. However, if hanzubon.jp archive will stop or be corrupted, 
>> then 
>>  **all** of those mirrors are same state. If sakura mirror can get updated 
>> archives
>>  from syncproxy, ftp.jp.d.o get more robustness IMO.
>>
>>  Could you consider to add sakura mirror as syncproxy leaf, please?
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>>
>>  Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
>>  http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane

-- 
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
  , 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#702122: mirrors: add debian-mirror.sakura.ne.jp to syncproxy leaf

2013-03-02 Thread Hideki Yamane
Package: mirrors
Severity: normal
X-debbugs-CC: debian-mirr...@lists.debian.org, bo...@debian.or.jp

Hi,

 Some of you may know, I've started debian-mirror.sakura.ne.jp.
 
http://henrich-on-debian.blogspot.com/2013/02/introducing-debian-mirrorsakuranejp.html

 Now it is pushed-mirror under hanzubon.jp, and I think it's better to be 
pushed 
 from upstream syncproxy if we can.

 The reason is, sakura mirror and other mirrors pushed from hanzubon.jp is 
providing
 ftp.jp.debian.org. ftp.jp.d.o has some robustness mechanism that if primary 
one goes
 down or not sync some days and be obsolete, then DNS entry will switch to 
point 
 another mirror. However, if hanzubon.jp archive will stop or be corrupted, 
then 
 **all** of those mirrors are same state. If sakura mirror can get updated 
archives
 from syncproxy, ftp.jp.d.o get more robustness IMO.

 Could you consider to add sakura mirror as syncproxy leaf, please?


-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
 http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org