Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7
Control: tags -1 + pending On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 11:31 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le jeudi, 6 juin 2013 23.21:52, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 21:41 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > > win32-loader (0.7.4.7+deb7u1) stable; urgency=low > > > > > > * Post-Wheezy release rebuild to update the embedded dependencies. > > > > Please go ahead; thanks. > > Uploaded, thanks. and flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7
Le jeudi, 6 juin 2013 23.21:52, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 21:41 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > win32-loader (0.7.4.7+deb7u1) stable; urgency=low > > > > * Post-Wheezy release rebuild to update the embedded dependencies. > > Please go ahead; thanks. Uploaded, thanks. OdyX signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7
Control: tags -1 + confimred On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 21:41 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > I have now uploaded 0.7.4.8 to unstable and would like to get win32-loader > 0.7.4.7+deb7u1 with the following changelog (no other change to source) as > follows: > > win32-loader (0.7.4.7+deb7u1) stable; urgency=low > > * Post-Wheezy release rebuild to update the embedded dependencies. Please go ahead; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7
Control: retitle -1 pu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7+deb7u1 Hi Julien, Le jeudi, 2 mai 2013 17.38:03, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > Le jeudi, 2 mai 2013 15.08:05, Julien Cristau a écrit : > > I think come back for r1. > > Fair enough. An upload to unstable would be good to have anyway, no? People > could then test it with pre-release-almost-wheezy material before the > stream of updates to unstable starts to flow. I have now uploaded 0.7.4.8 to unstable and would like to get win32-loader 0.7.4.7+deb7u1 with the following changelog (no other change to source) as follows: win32-loader (0.7.4.7+deb7u1) stable; urgency=low * Post-Wheezy release rebuild to update the embedded dependencies. -- Didier Raboud Mon, 03 Jun 2013 21:31:52 +0200 Can I go ahead with the upload? Thanks in advance, cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7
Le jeudi, 2 mai 2013 15.08:05, Julien Cristau a écrit : > > Usertags: tpu > > There's no such usertag. Damn. Trying to get inspiration from existing requests doesn't work well apparently. > > What do you think ? > > I think come back for r1. Fair enough. An upload to unstable would be good to have anyway, no? People could then test it with pre-release-almost-wheezy material before the stream of updates to unstable starts to flow. Cheers, OdyX signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 706598 = pu tag 706598 + wheezy On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:26:22 +0200, Didier Raboud wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: tpu > There's no such usertag. > Hi dear Release Team, > > I just got reminded that win32-loader embeds various other packages and > that it would be great to have its subparts updated for the Wheezy > release; namely, from it's current Built-Using field: > > cpio (= 2.11-8) > => 2.11+dfsg-0.1, same in unstable/testing > debian-archive-keyring (= 2012.4) > => No change > gnupg (= 1.4.12-4) > => 1.4.12-7, same in unstable/testing > grub2 (= 1.99-22.1) > => 1.99-27+deb7u1 in testing, 1.99-27.1 in unstable > gzip (= 1.5-1.1) > => No change > ipxe (= 1.0.0+git-20120202.f6840ba-3) > => No change > loadlin (= 1.6e-2) > => 1.6f-1 > > So grub2 being different in testing is the reason why win32-loader's > no-change rebuild would have to go through t-p-u. Of course I can upload > a no-change rebuild to unstable first to fulfill the version > constraints. > > win32-loader needs an FTP-master action for the debian/tools/* change; > and it will need to also be handled on release day. > > What do you think ? > I think come back for r1. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: tpu Hi dear Release Team, I just got reminded that win32-loader embeds various other packages and that it would be great to have its subparts updated for the Wheezy release; namely, from it's current Built-Using field: cpio (= 2.11-8) => 2.11+dfsg-0.1, same in unstable/testing debian-archive-keyring (= 2012.4) => No change gnupg (= 1.4.12-4) => 1.4.12-7, same in unstable/testing grub2 (= 1.99-22.1) => 1.99-27+deb7u1 in testing, 1.99-27.1 in unstable gzip (= 1.5-1.1) => No change ipxe (= 1.0.0+git-20120202.f6840ba-3) => No change loadlin (= 1.6e-2) => 1.6f-1 So grub2 being different in testing is the reason why win32-loader's no-change rebuild would have to go through t-p-u. Of course I can upload a no-change rebuild to unstable first to fulfill the version constraints. win32-loader needs an FTP-master action for the debian/tools/* change; and it will need to also be handled on release day. What do you think ? Cheers, OdyX -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_CH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
