Bug#707183: debian-policy: Removal of the FHS exception for the /selinux directory

2013-09-18 Thread Charles Plessy
user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
usertags 707183 normative
tag 707183 pending
thanks

> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:45:48AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> 
> > do you think it would make sense to remove the FHS exception for the 
> > /selinux
> > directory in the next version of the Policy ?
> 
> > See the attached patch.

Le Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 09:13:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> 
> Seconded.


Le Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:33:29AM +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:45:48 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> 
> > + 
> > +   
> > + The /sys in the root filesystem is additionally
> 
> missing 'directory'
… 
> With that fix, seconded.


Thanks Steve and Julien for your reviewing.  I have applied the patch.

-- 
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#707183: debian-policy: Removal of the FHS exception for the /selinux directory

2013-09-16 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:45:48 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:

> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> index 2708242..90ae9fe 100644
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -7021,15 +7021,14 @@ Built-Using: grub2 (= 1.99-9), loadlin (= 1.6e-1)
> stable release of Debian supports /run.
>   
> 
> -  
> -
> -  The following directories in the root filesystem are
> -  additionally allowed: /sys and
> -  /selinux. These directories
> -  are used as mount points to mount virtual filesystems
> -  to get access to kernel information.
> -
> -  
> +   
> + 
> +   The /sys in the root filesystem is additionally

missing 'directory'

> +   allowed. This directory is used as mount point to
> + mount virtual filesystems to get access to kernel
> + information.
> + 
> +   
> 
>   
> On GNU/Hurd systems, the following additional

With that fix, seconded.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#707183: debian-policy: Removal of the FHS exception for the /selinux directory

2013-09-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:45:48AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear all,

> do you think it would make sense to remove the FHS exception for the /selinux
> directory in the next version of the Policy ?

> See the attached patch.

Seconded.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org

> -- Charles Plessy, Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
> 
> Le Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:28:57AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> > Package: debian-policy
> > Severity: wishlist
> > 
> > Dear all,
> > 
> > in light of the message below, maybe the exception to the FHS for
> > /selinux can be removed from the Policy in the future ?
> > 
> > Cheers
> > 
> > -- Charles
> > 
> > - Forwarded message from Laurent Bigonville  -
> > 
> > Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 16:51:41 +0200
> > From: Laurent Bigonville 
> > To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
> > Cc: selinux-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> > Subject: Removal of the /selinux directory
> > Message-ID: <20130507165141.1bbec...@soldur.bigon.be>
> > X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I'm planning to upload a new version of libselinux in unstable
> > soon. This new version is dropping the /selinux directory that was used
> > in the past as the selinuxfs mountpoint.
> > 
> > Since Wheezy, the library is mounting selinuxfs under /sys/fs/selinux,
> > and falling back to /selinux if the former is not available during
> > early boot.
> > 
> > All the selinux userspace tools and libraries should already be aware of
> > this change. If you have packages that directly mount or manipulate
> > the selinuxfs, you should probably check that it use the correct paths
> > (ie. piupart, bug #682068).
> > 
> > I'm intentionally not forcing the migration to the new mountpoint nor
> > forcing the deletion of the directory on upgrade as, in my mind, if a
> > Wheezy machine is still using the old mountpoint that might be for
> > perfectly valid reasons and the package shouldn't touch it.
> > A discussion has already been initiated on the bug report, see: #658070.
> > 
> > Any remark on this?
> > 
> > Cheers
> > 
> > Laurent Bigonville
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > - End forwarded message -

> >From 34425d568113c741aa9f290069c6450d908f954c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Charles Plessy 
> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:43:02 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] Policy: Remove the exception to the FHS for the /selinux
>  directory.
> 
> Wording: Charles Plessy 
> Closes: #707183
> ---
>  policy.sgml | 17 -
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> index 2708242..90ae9fe 100644
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -7021,15 +7021,14 @@ Built-Using: grub2 (= 1.99-9), loadlin (= 1.6e-1)
> stable release of Debian supports /run.
>   
> 
> -  
> -
> -  The following directories in the root filesystem are
> -  additionally allowed: /sys and
> -  /selinux. These directories
> -  are used as mount points to mount virtual filesystems
> -  to get access to kernel information.
> -
> -  
> +   
> + 
> +   The /sys in the root filesystem is additionally
> +   allowed. This directory is used as mount point to
> + mount virtual filesystems to get access to kernel
> + information.
> + 
> +   
> 
>   
> On GNU/Hurd systems, the following additional
> -- 
> 1.8.4.rc3
> 



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#707183: debian-policy: Removal of the FHS exception for the /selinux directory

2013-09-15 Thread Charles Plessy
Dear all,

do you think it would make sense to remove the FHS exception for the /selinux
directory in the next version of the Policy ?

See the attached patch.

Have a nice day,

-- Charles Plessy, Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan

Le Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:28:57AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> in light of the message below, maybe the exception to the FHS for
> /selinux can be removed from the Policy in the future ?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> -- Charles
> 
> - Forwarded message from Laurent Bigonville  -
> 
> Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 16:51:41 +0200
> From: Laurent Bigonville 
> To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
> Cc: selinux-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Subject: Removal of the /selinux directory
> Message-ID: <20130507165141.1bbec...@soldur.bigon.be>
> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm planning to upload a new version of libselinux in unstable
> soon. This new version is dropping the /selinux directory that was used
> in the past as the selinuxfs mountpoint.
> 
> Since Wheezy, the library is mounting selinuxfs under /sys/fs/selinux,
> and falling back to /selinux if the former is not available during
> early boot.
> 
> All the selinux userspace tools and libraries should already be aware of
> this change. If you have packages that directly mount or manipulate
> the selinuxfs, you should probably check that it use the correct paths
> (ie. piupart, bug #682068).
> 
> I'm intentionally not forcing the migration to the new mountpoint nor
> forcing the deletion of the directory on upgrade as, in my mind, if a
> Wheezy machine is still using the old mountpoint that might be for
> perfectly valid reasons and the package shouldn't touch it.
> A discussion has already been initiated on the bug report, see: #658070.
> 
> Any remark on this?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Laurent Bigonville
> 
> 
> 
> - End forwarded message -
>From 34425d568113c741aa9f290069c6450d908f954c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charles Plessy 
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:43:02 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] Policy: Remove the exception to the FHS for the /selinux
 directory.

Wording: Charles Plessy 
Closes: #707183
---
 policy.sgml | 17 -
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
index 2708242..90ae9fe 100644
--- a/policy.sgml
+++ b/policy.sgml
@@ -7021,15 +7021,14 @@ Built-Using: grub2 (= 1.99-9), loadlin (= 1.6e-1)
 		  stable release of Debian supports /run.
 		
 	  
-  
-
-  The following directories in the root filesystem are
-  additionally allowed: /sys and
-  /selinux. These directories
-  are used as mount points to mount virtual filesystems
-  to get access to kernel information.
-
-  
+	  
+		
+		  The /sys in the root filesystem is additionally
+		  allowed. This directory is used as mount point to
+		mount virtual filesystems to get access to kernel
+		information.
+		
+	  
 	  
 		
 		  On GNU/Hurd systems, the following additional
-- 
1.8.4.rc3



Bug#707183: debian-policy: Removal of the FHS exception for the /selinux directory

2013-05-07 Thread Charles Plessy
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist

Dear all,

in light of the message below, maybe the exception to the FHS for
/selinux can be removed from the Policy in the future ?

Cheers

-- Charles

- Forwarded message from Laurent Bigonville  -

Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 16:51:41 +0200
From: Laurent Bigonville 
To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Cc: selinux-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Removal of the /selinux directory
Message-ID: <20130507165141.1bbec...@soldur.bigon.be>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

Hello,

I'm planning to upload a new version of libselinux in unstable
soon. This new version is dropping the /selinux directory that was used
in the past as the selinuxfs mountpoint.

Since Wheezy, the library is mounting selinuxfs under /sys/fs/selinux,
and falling back to /selinux if the former is not available during
early boot.

All the selinux userspace tools and libraries should already be aware of
this change. If you have packages that directly mount or manipulate
the selinuxfs, you should probably check that it use the correct paths
(ie. piupart, bug #682068).

I'm intentionally not forcing the migration to the new mountpoint nor
forcing the deletion of the directory on upgrade as, in my mind, if a
Wheezy machine is still using the old mountpoint that might be for
perfectly valid reasons and the package shouldn't touch it.
A discussion has already been initiated on the bug report, see: #658070.

Any remark on this?

Cheers

Laurent Bigonville



- End forwarded message -


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org