Bug#709949: [libarchive] FTBFS on mips and powerpc: test_read_disk_directory_traversals atime mismatches
Hi, Should this bug be closed? According to the buildd history: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libarchive=mips ...libarchive-3.1.2-7 did indeed fail once on mips, but was then rebuilt successfully, and has had no problems ever since; powerpc seems to be exactly the same. Of course, if somebody can reproduce the build failure, it should be tracked down. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org p...@storpool.com PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#709949: libarchive: FTBFS on mips and powerpc: test_read_disk_directory_traversals atime mismatches
Hi! I looked at the code and did not find anything suspicious (yet), but this issue might be related to this one: http://code.google.com/p/libarchive/issues/detail?id=223 The patch is apparently not applied on the Debian package (or upstream release). Since I cannot test this here, could someone maybe check if that solves the issue? If yes, I wonder why some buildd's apparently run with noatime. Cheers, Matthias -- I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#709949: libarchive: FTBFS on mips and powerpc: test_read_disk_directory_traversals atime mismatches
Hello! On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 04:10:12PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote: Hi! I looked at the code and did not find anything suspicious (yet), but this issue might be related to this one: http://code.google.com/p/libarchive/issues/detail?id=223 The patch is apparently not applied on the Debian package (or upstream release). Since I cannot test this here, could someone maybe check if that solves the issue? If yes, I wonder why some buildd's apparently run with noatime. The patch is applied, and further changes on top of it to make the test more portable If you looked in libarchive/test/test_read_disk_directory_traversals.c you should have noticed: Test if the current filesytem is mounted with noatime option. git blame is a useful command to find which exact commits are involved: https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/blame/master/libarchive/test/test_read_disk_directory_traversals.c Fwiw, libarchive builds fine in a sid chroot on the powerpc porter box. More suggestions on what could be the culprit for this problem welcome! -- Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#709949: libarchive: FTBFS on mips and powerpc: test_read_disk_directory_traversals atime mismatches
Control: severity -1 important Control: unblock 706866 with -1 On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 19:40:27 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: Source: libarchive Version: 3.1.2-7 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) The latest builds of libarchive on mips and powerpc failed with errors from test_read_disk_directory_traversals, which reported atime mismatches: It worked on a retry, so I'm downgrading this. We'll see if it happens again in the future... Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#709949: libarchive: FTBFS on mips and powerpc: test_read_disk_directory_traversals atime mismatches
Hi! 2013/6/10 Andreas Henriksson andr...@fatal.se: [...] The patch is applied, and further changes on top of it to make the test more portable If you looked in libarchive/test/test_read_disk_directory_traversals.c you should have noticed: Test if the current filesytem is mounted with noatime option. git blame is a useful command to find which exact commits are involved: https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/blame/master/libarchive/test/test_read_disk_directory_traversals.c Jup, I know - but I looked at the Debian Git branch, where I haven't found that patch ( http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/libarchive.git ) I can also confirm now that libarchive (upstream) builds here (powerpc). Cheers, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#709949: libarchive: FTBFS on mips and powerpc: test_read_disk_directory_traversals atime mismatches
Hi! Sorry, I made a mistake in checking this - the patch attached to the bug report was committed in a changed form (or changed afterwards), so I didn't see it immediately, but the current code does check for noatime. So this is certainly not the issue. Regards, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#709949: libarchive: FTBFS on mips and powerpc: test_read_disk_directory_traversals atime mismatches
Source: libarchive Version: 3.1.2-7 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) The latest builds of libarchive on mips and powerpc failed with errors from test_read_disk_directory_traversals, which reported atime mismatches: 115: test_read_disk_directory_traversals libarchive/test/test_read_disk_directory_traversals.c:1160: File at has atime 1369518519.0, expected 3808012493914112.1159668743880045816 Description: Atime should be restored libarchive/test/test_read_disk_directory_traversals.c:1162: File at/f1 has atime 1369518519.0, expected 3807918004633600.1159668743880045816 Description: Atime should be restored libarchive/test/test_read_disk_directory_traversals.c:1164: File at/f2 has atime 1369518519.0, expected 3807965249273856.1159668743880045816 Description: Atime should be restored libarchive/test/test_read_disk_directory_traversals.c:1209: File at has atime 1369518519.0, expected 3808012493914112.1159668743880045816 Description: Atime should be restored libarchive/test/test_read_disk_directory_traversals.c:1263: File at has atime 1369518519.0, expected 3808012493914112.1159668743880045816 Description: Atime should be restored (The absurdly high expected values apparently stem from a reporting error that could stand fixing as well, though I won't bother filing a separate bug report: assertion_file_time in libarchive/test/main.c uses %lld for t and nsec even though they have type long, not long long.) Could you please take a look? Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
