Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2
On 2015-01-17 at 12:14:21, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > It doesn't look like anything happened in the meantime. > > Do we know what's required to make the package work with the current > iceweasel in wheezy? Now that stable and unstable are tracking the same version of iceweasel, I'm guessing we need to upload the unstable version of iceweasel as a stable wheezy update. Francois -- Francois Marier identi.ca/fmarier http://fmarier.org twitter.com/fmarier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2
On 2014-01-21 22:12, Francois Marier wrote: On 2014-01-21 at 18:20:32, intrigeri wrote: Cyril Brulebois wrote (23 Sep 2013 04:02:26 GMT) : > Adam D. Barratt (2013-06-09): >> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy > it's been 3+ months now. ... and now 7+ months. Sorry, I've obviously dropped the ball here. If anybody wants to take this bug over and prepare/test a package for stable, I'd be happy to review and sponsor if needed. It doesn't look like anything happened in the meantime. Do we know what's required to make the package work with the current iceweasel in wheezy? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2
On 2014-01-21 at 18:20:32, intrigeri wrote: > Cyril Brulebois wrote (23 Sep 2013 04:02:26 GMT) : > > Adam D. Barratt (2013-06-09): > >> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy > > > it's been 3+ months now. > > ... and now 7+ months. Sorry, I've obviously dropped the ball here. If anybody wants to take this bug over and prepare/test a package for stable, I'd be happy to review and sponsor if needed. Francois -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2
Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote (23 Sep 2013 04:02:26 GMT) : > Adam D. Barratt (2013-06-09): >> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy > it's been 3+ months now. ... and now 7+ months. >> Is it still compatible with Iceweasel 10.0, which is still in stable >> for the moment at least? > Same question with s/10/17/ now I guess… ... and soon with Iceweasel 24, presumably. François: ping? Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2
Hi Francois, Adam D. Barratt (2013-06-09): > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy it's been 3+ months now. > On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 19:13 +1200, Francois Marier wrote: > > Iceweasel 17 got pushed to stable through a security update. > > It's currently not actually made it to stable itself fwiw, as it FTBFS > on several architectures. stable-new has 17.0.8esr-2~deb7u1 now, available everywhere AFAICS. > > The version of iceweasel-vimperator that's in stable is not > > compatible with Iceweasel 17 and the security team has suggested I > > uploaded an updated package to stable-proposed. > > > > The package I would be uploading is simply the one that's currently > > in unstable (upstream release 3.7.1). It is compatible with > > Iceweasel up to 21 so it should be good for a while. > > Is it still compatible with Iceweasel 10.0, which is still in stable > for the moment at least? Same question with s/10/17/ now I guess… Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 19:13 +1200, Francois Marier wrote: > Iceweasel 17 got pushed to stable through a security update. It's currently not actually made it to stable itself fwiw, as it FTBFS on several architectures. > The version of iceweasel-vimperator that's in stable is not compatible with > Iceweasel 17 and the security team has suggested I uploaded an updated > package to stable-proposed. > > The package I would be uploading is simply the one that's currently in > unstable > (upstream release 3.7.1). It is compatible with Iceweasel up to 21 so it > should > be good for a while. Is it still compatible with Iceweasel 10.0, which is still in stable for the moment at least? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Iceweasel 17 got pushed to stable through a security update. The version of iceweasel-vimperator that's in stable is not compatible with Iceweasel 17 and the security team has suggested I uploaded an updated package to stable-proposed. The package I would be uploading is simply the one that's currently in unstable (upstream release 3.7.1). It is compatible with Iceweasel up to 21 so it should be good for a while. Francois -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
