Bug#712938: Qt4 and sni-qt

2015-05-08 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Friday 08 May 2015 10:24:30 Tsu Jan wrote:
 On Thu, 07 May 2015 11:28:28 -0300 Lisandro
 
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dami=E1n_Nicanor_P=E9rez?= Meyer perezme...@gmail.com 
wrote:
  - sni-qt seems to be dead-upstream:
  ...
  Uploading dead-upstream stuff to the archive doesn't seems a wise idea to
  me, so if anyone wants this in then jump in as sni-qt upstream. Or
  **much**
 better
 
  yet, just help porting the code to Qt5.
 
 sni-qt is only for Qt4 and needs a patch. As far as I know, no change will
 be needed with Qt5 = 5.4 for the systray icons to work.

Right, that's why we recommend porting the apps to Qt5.

 sni-qt  may be dead-upstream but Qt4 is so too and yet there are so many
 Qt4 apps.

Indeed, and again: better if you port your app to Qt5 :)

 As mentioned above, Enlightenment already needs sni-qt for Qt4
 apps to show their systray icons.

Well, let them become upstream of sni-qt and we can reconsider :)

-- 
I'm your worst nightmare.
  Eric S. Raymond to Craig Mundie

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#712938: Qt4 and sni-qt

2015-05-07 Thread Tsu Jan
On Thu, 07 May 2015 11:28:28 -0300 Lisandro 
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dami=E1n_Nicanor_P=E9rez?= Meyer perezme...@gmail.com wrote:
 - sni-qt seems to be dead-upstream:
 ...
 Uploading dead-upstream stuff to the archive doesn't seems a wise idea to me, 
 so if anyone wants this in then jump in as sni-qt upstream. Or **much** 
better 
 yet, just help porting the code to Qt5.

sni-qt is only for Qt4 and needs a patch. As far as I know, no change will be 
needed with Qt5 = 5.4 for the systray icons to work.

sni-qt  may be dead-upstream but Qt4 is so too and yet there are so many Qt4 
apps. As mentioned above, Enlightenment already needs sni-qt for Qt4 apps to 
show their systray icons.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#712938: Qt4 and sni-qt

2015-05-07 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Hi everyone! As we are approaching the time when we will start having kf5 
stuff in the archive and people will start wanting this feature in so they 
can use their Qt4 apps I thought it would be good to let you know some details 
of this package.

So with my Qt-maintainer hat on:

- sni-qt needs a patch in Qt4 not ACKed by upstream (although this might be 
just because the patch came too late in Qt4's lifetime).

- We Qt maintainers do our best to just patch when there is a *real* good 
reason and upstream ACKs the patch.

We do understand that this patch and sni-qt might be really somthing to 
consider, but apart from the above statements we have found other reasons to 
not consider sni-qt:

- The patch is only required by sni-qt

- sni-qt seems to be dead-upstream:
 * It received it last commit more three years from now:
  https://code.launchpad.net/~indicator-applet-developers/sni-qt/trunk.13.04
   It actually had it's 3rd anniversary the day we released Jessie ;)
 * The bug list is:
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sni-qt
   The most recent bug there has been opened in August last year, received
   priority high in December and is still open.

Uploading dead-upstream stuff to the archive doesn't seems a wise idea to me, 
so if anyone wants this in then jump in as sni-qt upstream. Or **much** better 
yet, just help porting the code to Qt5.

Regards, Lisandro.

-- 
Simulations are not data. In God we trust, all the others must supply data.
 Walter Opyd, Show Me The Data IEEE Spectrum's reader's comments,
 http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/nov04/4004

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.