Bug#723103: dieharder: non-free due to $beverage clause?

2014-12-26 Thread Ron

Hi,

Did you want to actually close or downgrade this bug now?
The dieharder package got autoremoved from jessie because
it's still outstanding with RC severity.

I asked -release about jessie-ignoring it like it was for
wheezy, and the initial answer from them is that they'd
prefer it if either you resolved it, or it gets punted to
ftpmaster to decide.

Personally I don't really see a problem with the clause in
question either.  It's the author's own code to licence,
not an addition to someone else's GPL code, and it's clearly
said that he doesn't consider the extra request binding.

  Cheers,
  Ron


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#723103: dieharder: non-free due to $beverage clause?

2014-12-26 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 27 December 2014 at 04:18, Ron wrote:
| 
| Hi,
| 
| Did you want to actually close or downgrade this bug now?

No, because nobody ever replied (including upstream, with whom I've worked on
RDieHarder for years, but whose email response rate is still, err, a little
erratic). 

| The dieharder package got autoremoved from jessie because
| it's still outstanding with RC severity.
| 
| I asked -release about jessie-ignoring it like it was for
| wheezy, and the initial answer from them is that they'd
| prefer it if either you resolved it, or it gets punted to
| ftpmaster to decide.
| 
| Personally I don't really see a problem with the clause in
| question either.  It's the author's own code to licence,
| not an addition to someone else's GPL code, and it's clearly
| said that he doesn't consider the extra request binding.

I did not want to step on anybody's policy toes.

If you too are cool with closing this, I can surely do that.

Dirk

| 
|   Cheers,
|   Ron

-- 
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#723103: dieharder: non-free due to $beverage clause?

2014-12-26 Thread Ron
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 12:14:09PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
 
 On 27 December 2014 at 04:18, Ron wrote:
 | 
 | Hi,
 | 
 | Did you want to actually close or downgrade this bug now?
 
 No, because nobody ever replied (including upstream, with whom I've worked on
 RDieHarder for years, but whose email response rate is still, err, a little
 erratic). 
 
 | The dieharder package got autoremoved from jessie because
 | it's still outstanding with RC severity.
 | 
 | I asked -release about jessie-ignoring it like it was for
 | wheezy, and the initial answer from them is that they'd
 | prefer it if either you resolved it, or it gets punted to
 | ftpmaster to decide.
 | 
 | Personally I don't really see a problem with the clause in
 | question either.  It's the author's own code to licence,
 | not an addition to someone else's GPL code, and it's clearly
 | said that he doesn't consider the extra request binding.
 
 I did not want to step on anybody's policy toes.
 
 If you too are cool with closing this, I can surely do that.

The rough consensus of people who have replied to the bug would
seem to be that it's not considered a problem, and ftpmaster
were cc'd by the original reporter, and they haven't seen fit
to remove it from sid or object to the wheezy-ignore.

So yeah, I'd say let's close it and get it back into jessie,
and if Raphael strongly disagrees, he can appeal to ftpmaster
for more some more formal guidance on their part.  They've had
plenty of time to respond already if they considered it not fit
for main though, so it seems reasonable to call this for the
consensus view now.

Best case, the matter is closed.  Worst case, it escalates to
a dispute and ftpmaster gives us their opinion.  Either way
that seems like the right way to resolve this now.

  Thanks!
  Ron


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#723103: dieharder: non-free due to $beverage clause?

2014-10-06 Thread Peter
 I would like to close this. Objections?

I would suggest reducing the severity instead, perhaps with a rename.
Otherwise there is a risk of duplicates being raised, and the issue
repeating itself.


Regards,
Peter


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#723103: dieharder: non-free due to $beverage clause?

2013-09-16 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: dieharder
Severity: grave
Version: 3.31.1-3
X-Debbugs-cc: ftpmas...@debian.org

Hi,

As per the copyright file[1]:
   License is granted to build or use the accompanying software:

 dieharder

  according to the following standard Gnu General Public License or any
  later versions, with the one minor Beverage modification listed below.
  Note that this modification is probably not legally defensible and can
  be followed really pretty much according to the honor rule.

  As to my personal preferences in beverages, red wine is great, beer is
  delightful, and Coca Cola or coffee or tea or even milk acceptable to
  those who for religious or personal reasons wish to avoid stressing my
  liver.

  The Beverage Modification to the GPL

  Any user of this software shall, upon meeting the primary author(s) of
  this software for the first time under the appropriate circumstances,
  offer to buy him or her or them a beverage.  This beverage may or may
  not be alcoholic, depending on the personal ethical and moral views of
  the offerer.  The beverage cost need not exceed one U.S. dollar
  (although it certainly may at the whim of the offerer:-) and may be
  accepted or declined with no further obligation on the part of the
  offerer.  It is not necessary to repeat the offer after the first
  meeting, but it can't hurt...


This looks non-free, it turns the program into a beerware.
CC'ing ftpmasters so that they can comment and act if necessary.

[1]http://ftp-master.metadata.debian.org/changelogs/main/d/dieharder/unstable_copyright

Cheers,
-- 
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#723103: dieharder: non-free due to $beverage clause?

2013-09-16 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel

On 16 September 2013 at 17:24, Raphael Geissert wrote:
| Package: dieharder
| Severity: grave

Really?  

CCing upstream who may find the his absence of a sense of humour rather 
humouress.

Dirk

| Version: 3.31.1-3
| X-Debbugs-cc: ftpmas...@debian.org
| 
| Hi,
| 
| As per the copyright file[1]:
|License is granted to build or use the accompanying software:
| 
|  dieharder
| 
|   according to the following standard Gnu General Public License or any
|   later versions, with the one minor Beverage modification listed below.
|   Note that this modification is probably not legally defensible and can
|   be followed really pretty much according to the honor rule.
| 
|   As to my personal preferences in beverages, red wine is great, beer is
|   delightful, and Coca Cola or coffee or tea or even milk acceptable to
|   those who for religious or personal reasons wish to avoid stressing my
|   liver.
| 
|   The Beverage Modification to the GPL
| 
|   Any user of this software shall, upon meeting the primary author(s) of
|   this software for the first time under the appropriate circumstances,
|   offer to buy him or her or them a beverage.  This beverage may or may
|   not be alcoholic, depending on the personal ethical and moral views of
|   the offerer.  The beverage cost need not exceed one U.S. dollar
|   (although it certainly may at the whim of the offerer:-) and may be
|   accepted or declined with no further obligation on the part of the
|   offerer.  It is not necessary to repeat the offer after the first
|   meeting, but it can't hurt...
| 
| 
| This looks non-free, it turns the program into a beerware.
| CC'ing ftpmasters so that they can comment and act if necessary.
| 
| 
[1]http://ftp-master.metadata.debian.org/changelogs/main/d/dieharder/unstable_copyright
|
| 
| Cheers,
| -- 
| Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
| www.debian.org - get.debian.net

-- 
Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#723103: dieharder: non-free due to $beverage clause?

2013-09-16 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:24:58PM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
   according to the following standard Gnu General Public License or any
   later versions, with the one minor Beverage modification listed below.
   Note that this modification is probably not legally defensible and can
   be followed really pretty much according to the honor rule.

I tend to agree with this - GPL section 10:

  /
  | You may not impose any further restrictions on the exercise of the
  | rights granted or affirmed under this License. For example, you may not
  | impose a license fee, royalty, or other charge for exercise of rights
  | granted under this License, 
  \

   As to my personal preferences in beverages, red wine is great, beer is
   delightful, and Coca Cola or coffee or tea or even milk acceptable to
   those who for religious or personal reasons wish to avoid stressing my
   liver.
 
   The Beverage Modification to the GPL
 
   Any user of this software shall, upon meeting the primary author(s) of
   this software for the first time under the appropriate circumstances,
   offer to buy him or her or them a beverage.  This beverage may or may
   not be alcoholic, depending on the personal ethical and moral views of
   the offerer.  The beverage cost need not exceed one U.S. dollar
   (although it certainly may at the whim of the offerer:-) and may be
   accepted or declined with no further obligation on the part of the
   offerer.  It is not necessary to repeat the offer after the first
   meeting, but it can't hurt...


If valid, this will likely be non-free. I don't think depending on that
reading of section 10 is great, so perhaps it's right to move this to
non-free.

It'd be nice if he rephrased shall to may - it seems like he's not keen
to enforce it either. That would likely make this free enough (tm), but
I'd need to re-read it to be sure.

Cheers,
  Paul

[just as a DD, not ftpteam hacker]

-- 
 .''`.  Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :'  : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'`  4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352  D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature