Bug#724287: rt4-extension-jsgantt, trac-jsgantt: embeds jsgantt - should depend on libjs-jsgantt separately packaged

2013-10-17 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Satoru KURASHIKI (2013-10-17 03:18:53)
 On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
 Ah, right - here are the diffs: 
 https://github.com/bestpractical/rt-extension-jsgantt/tree/master/etc

 The libjs-jsgantt package could include wiht its source the above 
 diffs and apply them at build time, to also offer in the binary 
 package the patched variant usable for RT.

 I believe that is much better than status quo.

 I'm unsure which that is better or not, but anyway, nearly dead 
 upstream, few references, and so on...

Indeed not actively maintained - but evidently in active use, so 
arguably _more_ important to streamline for eventual bugfixing.


 Package libjs-jsgantt does not yet exist. �Just now I filed 
 bug#725794, and intend to do the packaging unless (preferred) someone 
 else in the Javascript team picks it up.
 
 if libjs-jsgantt is packaged and provides patched variant for rt, I 
 will update rt-extension-jsgantt to fit.

Thanks!


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: signature


Bug#724287: rt4-extension-jsgantt, trac-jsgantt: embeds jsgantt - should depend on libjs-jsgantt separately packaged

2013-10-16 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi,

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:


 Ah, right - here are the diffs:
 https://github.com/bestpractical/rt-extension-jsgantt/tree/master/etc

 The libjs-jsgantt package could include wiht its source the above diffs
 and apply them at build time, to also offer in the binary package the
 patched variant usable for RT.

 I believe that is much better than status quo.


I'm unsure which that is better or not, but anyway,
# nearly dead upstream, few references, and so on...


 Package libjs-jsgantt does not yet exist.  Just now I filed bug#725794,
 and intend to do the packaging unless (preferred) someone else in the
 Javascript team picks it up.


if libjs-jsgantt is packaged and provides patched variant for rt, I will
update
rt-extension-jsgantt to fit.

regards,
-- 
KURASHIKI Satoru


Bug#724287: rt4-extension-jsgantt, trac-jsgantt: embeds jsgantt - should depend on libjs-jsgantt separately packaged

2013-10-08 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi,

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:

 Package: rt4-extension-jsgantt,trac-jsgantt
 Severity: normal
 Tags: security

 Packages rt4-extension-jsgantt and trac-jsgantt embed the Javascript
 library jsgantt.

 That Javascript library should instead be packaged separately and
 depended upon.  Package name should be libjs-jsgantt according to
 https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Policy.

 This issue potentially affects security: See Debian Policy 3.9.4 § 4.13.


Unfortunately, rt-extension-jsgantt includes modified version of jsgantt to
work with rt, so it couldn't depend on libjs-jsgantt if it exists.

regards,
-- 
KURASHIKI Satoru


Bug#724287: rt4-extension-jsgantt, trac-jsgantt: embeds jsgantt - should depend on libjs-jsgantt separately packaged

2013-10-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Satoru KURASHIKI (2013-10-08 14:34:49)
 On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
 Packages rt4-extension-jsgantt and trac-jsgantt embed the Javascript 
 library jsgantt.

 That Javascript library should instead be packaged separately and 
 depended upon. Package name should be libjs-jsgantt according to 
 https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Policy.

 This issue potentially affects security: See Debian Policy 3.9.4 § 
 4.13.

 Unfortunately, rt-extension-jsgantt includes modified version of 
 jsgantt to work with rt, so it couldn't depend on libjs-jsgantt

Ah, right - here are the diffs: 
https://github.com/bestpractical/rt-extension-jsgantt/tree/master/etc

The libjs-jsgantt package could include wiht its source the above diffs 
and apply them at build time, to also offer in the binary package the 
patched variant usable for RT.

I believe that is much better than status quo.


 if it exists.

Package libjs-jsgantt does not yet exist.  Just now I filed bug#725794, 
and intend to do the packaging unless (preferred) someone else in the 
Javascript team picks it up.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: signature


Bug#724287: rt4-extension-jsgantt, trac-jsgantt: embeds jsgantt - should depend on libjs-jsgantt separately packaged

2013-09-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: rt4-extension-jsgantt,trac-jsgantt
Severity: normal
Tags: security

Packages rt4-extension-jsgantt and trac-jsgantt embed the Javascript
library jsgantt.

That Javascript library should instead be packaged separately and
depended upon.  Package name should be libjs-jsgantt according to
https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Policy.

This issue potentially affects security: See Debian Policy 3.9.4 § 4.13.


 - Jonas


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org