On 2013-11-29 20:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi Goffredo,
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:19:41PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 2013-11-28 21:51, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
Hi Goffredo,
Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@inwind.it writes:
Systemd has as main target Fedora. Debian is different from Fedora, so
Nope.
systemd is not targeting one distribution as its main target. It is
running on many distributions, with no particular focus on any single
one of them.
Let me rephrase this sentence: systemd is not sensible to the debian
requirements; otherwise there would not be the problems to support the
other debian kernels (like hurd and bsd).
Even if this were true, this bug report is not about hurd or bsd.
Since this is a bug report, let me ask again: is there anything to fix
with the sysctl stuff?
As reported in my first report [1]:
Problem description:
After installing the systemd package some sysrq keys don't work any more.
[...]
Expected behaviour:
The systemd package must not interact with the sysrq key setting
I am trying to send a patch to systemd-devel to split the content of the
systemd sysctl config file in smaller file to simplify the overriding of
the single file.
Worse, the workaround which I found [2] will be nullified with the new
systemd versions because it is changing the processing order of the
sysctl files configuration..
IMHO The big problem is that there is a sysctl setting as side effect
of systemd. It would be a debian setting.
Thanks in advance for your work (packaging, testing, talking with the
bug highlighter :-) ).
BR
G.Baroncelli
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725422
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725422#29
Zbyszek
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
