Bug#726575: RequiredComponents=[...]; nautilus-classic; in gnome-flashback.session.desktop
Am Donnerstag, den 17.10.2013, 13:28 +0200 schrieb Michael Biebl: Fair enough. Retitling the bug report and bumping severity. Might even be bumped to serious. I have taken the liberty to fix this in SVN. - Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#726575: RequiredComponents=[...]; nautilus-classic; in gnome-flashback.session.desktop
retitle 726575 gnome-session-flashback needs a versioned depdendency on nautilus = 3.8 severity 726575 important thanks Am 17.10.2013 06:25, schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Am Mittwoch, den 16.10.2013, 22:12 +0200 schrieb Michael Biebl: /usr/share/applications/nautilus-classic.desktop I see, I didn't have my nautilus upgraded to version 3.8 yet. However, it is nowhere reflected in the package relations that gnome-session-flashback depends on nautilus (= 3.8). Fair enough. Retitling the bug report and bumping severity. Might even be bumped to serious. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#726575: RequiredComponents=[...];nautilus-classic; in gnome-flashback.session.desktop
package: gnome-session-flashback version: 3.6.2-1 severity: minor Hi there, I have seen that for the first upload to unstable of the gnome-session-flashback package, you disabled the 00_dont-require-nautilus-classic.patch patch. This patch, however, removes nautilus-classic from the list of RequiredComponents in the gnome-flashback.session.desktop file. Disabling the patch, in turn, leads to this component becoming required again. However, I have yet to find a single file that contains the string nautilus-classic in its file name in entire Debian. Is it possible that this is a misunderstanding and plain nautilus was meant to be added to RequiredComponents? That is, the patch needs to get applied but instead of removing nautilus-classic it simply has to change it to nautilus? Cheers, - Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#726575: RequiredComponents=[...]; nautilus-classic; in gnome-flashback.session.desktop
Am 16.10.2013 21:54, schrieb Fabian Greffrath: package: gnome-session-flashback version: 3.6.2-1 severity: minor Hi there, I have seen that for the first upload to unstable of the gnome-session-flashback package, you disabled the 00_dont-require-nautilus-classic.patch patch. This patch, however, removes nautilus-classic from the list of RequiredComponents in the gnome-flashback.session.desktop file. Disabling the patch, in turn, leads to this component becoming required again. However, I have yet to find a single file that contains the string nautilus-classic in its file name in entire Debian. /usr/share/applications/nautilus-classic.desktop -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#726575: RequiredComponents=[...]; nautilus-classic; in gnome-flashback.session.desktop
Am Mittwoch, den 16.10.2013, 22:12 +0200 schrieb Michael Biebl: /usr/share/applications/nautilus-classic.desktop I see, I didn't have my nautilus upgraded to version 3.8 yet. However, it is nowhere reflected in the package relations that gnome-session-flashback depends on nautilus (= 3.8). - Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
