Bug#736172: _GLIBCXX_LONG_DOUBLE_COMPAT in gccxml
Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org (2014-01-20): reassign 736172 gccxml 0.9.0+git20130511-1 affects 736172 src:gdcm thanks Re-assigning to gccxml, this looks like a low level details issue that occurs from time to time in gccxml embedded copy of gcc (when they go out of sync). Brad, have you ever seen this before: http://bugs.debian.org/736172#5 It would really be helpful to keep the submitter in the loop when you reply to bug reports… (I only learnt about the reassignment and the patch availability because I needed a reference to this bug report, and noticed the status changed.) Thanks already. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#736172: _GLIBCXX_LONG_DOUBLE_COMPAT in gccxml
reassign 736172 gccxml 0.9.0+git20130511-1 affects 736172 src:gdcm thanks Re-assigning to gccxml, this looks like a low level details issue that occurs from time to time in gccxml embedded copy of gcc (when they go out of sync). Brad, have you ever seen this before: http://bugs.debian.org/736172#5 Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#736172: _GLIBCXX_LONG_DOUBLE_COMPAT in gccxml
tags 736172 confirmed fixed-upstream patch thanks On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org wrote: reassign 736172 gccxml 0.9.0+git20130511-1 affects 736172 src:gdcm thanks Re-assigning to gccxml, this looks like a low level details issue that occurs from time to time in gccxml embedded copy of gcc (when they go out of sync). Brad, have you ever seen this before: http://bugs.debian.org/736172#5 Answering myself: https://github.com/gccxml/gccxml/commit/9a114c0c9bed3177dd5ef6252abdcb87ca7e4640 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org