Bug#745452: apt: Consistently use Dpkg::Progress* in documentation

2014-04-22 Thread Michael Vogt
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 04:54:04PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
 Package: apt
 Version: 1.0.1
 Severity: minor

Thanks for your bugreport and your patch.
 
 Dear Maintainer,
 
 Apt's documentation refers to DpkgPM::Progress, Dpkg::Progress-Fancy,
 and DpkgPM::Progress-Fancy.  DpkgPM::Progress was renamed to
 Dpkg::Progress in 6c5ae8ed, although the former is still understood for
 backwards-compatibility, and DpkgPM::Progress-Fancy was renamed to
 Dpkg::Progress-Fancy in 1c6089d7.
 
 The attached patch updates the documentation to consistently use the
 Dpkg:: variants of the options.

Thanks for the cleanup, I merged your patch and it will be part of the
next upload.

Cheers,
 Michael
 
 -- Package-specific info:
 
 -- (no /etc/apt/preferences present) --
 
 
 -- (/etc/apt/sources.list present, but not submitted) --
 
 
 -- System Information:
 Debian Release: jessie/sid
   APT prefers unstable
   APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
 Foreign Architectures: i386
 
 Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
 Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
 
 Versions of packages apt depends on:
 ii  debian-archive-keyring  2012.4
 ii  gnupg   1.4.16-1.1
 ii  libapt-pkg4.12  1.0.1
 ii  libc6   2.18-4
 ii  libgcc1 1:4.9-20140411-2
 ii  libstdc++6  4.9-20140411-2
 
 apt recommends no packages.
 
 Versions of packages apt suggests:
 pn  apt-doc none
 ii  aptitude0.6.10-1
 ii  dpkg-dev1.17.6
 ii  python-apt  0.9.3.5
 
 -- no debconf information

 From 10bc7148eedba84b237b3b91b41f97dc5596db80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: James McCoy james...@debian.org
 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:35:28 -0400
 Subject: [PATCH] Consistently use Dpkg::Progress* in documentation
 
 Signed-off-by: James McCoy james...@debian.org
 ---
  doc/apt-get.8.xml | 2 +-
  doc/apt.8.xml | 2 +-
  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/doc/apt-get.8.xml b/doc/apt-get.8.xml
 index 1ed0890..a3bfc33 100644
 --- a/doc/apt-get.8.xml
 +++ b/doc/apt-get.8.xml
 @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@
   terminal window when packages are installed, upgraded or
   removed. For a machine parsable version of this data see
   README.progress-reporting in the apt doc directory.
 - Configuration Item: literalDpkgPM::Progress/literal and 
 literalDpkg::Progress-Fancy/literal./para/listitem
 + Configuration Item: literalDpkg::Progress/literal and 
 literalDpkg::Progress-Fancy/literal./para/listitem
   /varlistentry
  
  
 diff --git a/doc/apt.8.xml b/doc/apt.8.xml
 index 85e7276..bcad5ee 100644
 --- a/doc/apt.8.xml
 +++ b/doc/apt.8.xml
 @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
   
   itemizedlist
 listitem
 - paraThe option literalDPkgPM::Progress-Fancy/literal is enabled.
 + paraThe option literalDPkg::Progress-Fancy/literal is enabled.
   /para
 /listitem
 listitem
 -- 
 1.9.2
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#745452: apt: Consistently use Dpkg::Progress* in documentation

2014-04-21 Thread James McCoy
Package: apt
Version: 1.0.1
Severity: minor

Dear Maintainer,

Apt's documentation refers to DpkgPM::Progress, Dpkg::Progress-Fancy,
and DpkgPM::Progress-Fancy.  DpkgPM::Progress was renamed to
Dpkg::Progress in 6c5ae8ed, although the former is still understood for
backwards-compatibility, and DpkgPM::Progress-Fancy was renamed to
Dpkg::Progress-Fancy in 1c6089d7.

The attached patch updates the documentation to consistently use the
Dpkg:: variants of the options.

-- Package-specific info:

-- (no /etc/apt/preferences present) --


-- (/etc/apt/sources.list present, but not submitted) --


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  debian-archive-keyring  2012.4
ii  gnupg   1.4.16-1.1
ii  libapt-pkg4.12  1.0.1
ii  libc6   2.18-4
ii  libgcc1 1:4.9-20140411-2
ii  libstdc++6  4.9-20140411-2

apt recommends no packages.

Versions of packages apt suggests:
pn  apt-doc none
ii  aptitude0.6.10-1
ii  dpkg-dev1.17.6
ii  python-apt  0.9.3.5

-- no debconf information
From 10bc7148eedba84b237b3b91b41f97dc5596db80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James McCoy james...@debian.org
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:35:28 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Consistently use Dpkg::Progress* in documentation

Signed-off-by: James McCoy james...@debian.org
---
 doc/apt-get.8.xml | 2 +-
 doc/apt.8.xml | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/apt-get.8.xml b/doc/apt-get.8.xml
index 1ed0890..a3bfc33 100644
--- a/doc/apt-get.8.xml
+++ b/doc/apt-get.8.xml
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@
  terminal window when packages are installed, upgraded or
  removed. For a machine parsable version of this data see
  README.progress-reporting in the apt doc directory.
- Configuration Item: literalDpkgPM::Progress/literal and literalDpkg::Progress-Fancy/literal./para/listitem
+ Configuration Item: literalDpkg::Progress/literal and literalDpkg::Progress-Fancy/literal./para/listitem
  /varlistentry
 
 
diff --git a/doc/apt.8.xml b/doc/apt.8.xml
index 85e7276..bcad5ee 100644
--- a/doc/apt.8.xml
+++ b/doc/apt.8.xml
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
  
  itemizedlist
listitem
- paraThe option literalDPkgPM::Progress-Fancy/literal is enabled.
+ paraThe option literalDPkg::Progress-Fancy/literal is enabled.
  /para
/listitem
listitem
-- 
1.9.2



Bug#745452: apt: Consistently use Dpkg::Progress* in documentation

2014-04-21 Thread James McCoy
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 04:54:04PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
 The attached patch updates the documentation to consistently use the
 Dpkg:: variants of the options.

This will also fix LP#1310506.

Cheers,
-- 
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy james...@debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org