Bug#745732: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#745732: update fontforge (Re: Bug#745732: (no subject)
On Wed, 21 May 2014, Hideki Yamane wrote: > +++ lintian output +++ > E: fontforge source: source-is-missing > nodejs/collabwebview/js/jquery-1.9.1.min.js > E: fontforge source: source-is-missing > nodejs/collabwebview/js/jquery.masonry.min.js > > Thanks to smart lintian ;) > It's first time for me to deal with jquery non-min file issue. Ignore for now ... it is just a pain with it with thousands of emails hacking back and forth. As long as this is not getting viral I ignore the same things in my packages. > What is the smartest way to fix this, does anyone have any pointer to this? Ignore for now ;-) Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#745732: update fontforge (Re: Bug#745732: (no subject)
On Mon, 19 May 2014 20:45:19 +0900 Hideki Yamane wrote: > Not yet done. Setting up lintian (2.5.22.1) ... +++ lintian output +++ E: fontforge source: source-is-missing nodejs/collabwebview/js/jquery-1.9.1.min.js E: fontforge source: source-is-missing nodejs/collabwebview/js/jquery.masonry.min.js Thanks to smart lintian ;) It's first time for me to deal with jquery non-min file issue. What is the smartest way to fix this, does anyone have any pointer to this? Just find jquery source from upstream github repository and put it to debian/missing-sources directory is enough? -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#745732: [Pkg-fonts-devel] update fontforge (Re: Bug#745732: (no subject)
Quoting Hideki Yamane (2014-05-19 13:45:19) > On Sat, 26 Apr 2014 14:16:09 +0900 > Hideki Yamane wrote: >> I forgot entrely about it... oh, it's 4 months ago. >> Probably would have a time to investigate it in next weekend, around >> 3th to 6th May, so please wait it. I'll put it from git to >> experimental. > > Not yet done. Great that you are still on it! > - don't know why libreadline is disabled Perhaps because of licensing issues: Readline is a GNU project - I believe 5.x is GPL-2+ and 6.x is GPL-3+. As you perhaps know already, fontforge need not be licensed identically, but the parts linking against Readline needs to be compatibly licensed - e.g. LGPL-2 or GPL-2 code can link against libreadline5 but not against libreadline6. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#745732: update fontforge (Re: Bug#745732: (no subject)
On Sat, 26 Apr 2014 14:16:09 +0900 Hideki Yamane wrote: > I forgot entrely about it... oh, it's 4 months ago. > Probably would have a time to investigate it in next weekend, around > 3th to 6th May, so please wait it. I'll put it from git to experimental. Not yet done. From my old memo as build log, > Summary of optional features: > > real (floating pt) double > programsyes > native scriptingyes > python scriptingyes > python extensionyes > freetype debugger no > capslock for altno > raw points mode no > tile path no > gb12345 encodingno > > Summary of optional dependencies: > > cairo yes http://www.cairographics.org/ > giflib yes http://giflib.sourceforge.net/ > libjpeg yes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libjpeg > libpng yes http://www.libpng.org/ > libtiff yes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libtiff > libxml yes http://www.xmlsoft.org/ > libspiroyes https://github.com/fontforge/libspiro > libuninameslist yes https://github.com/fontforge/libuninameslist > libunicodenames no https://bitbucket.org/sortsmill/libunicodenames > zeromq (libzmq) no http://www.zeromq.org/ > libreadline no http://www.gnu.org/software/readline - libunicodenames is not packaged yet - zeromq should be "libzmq >= 4.0.0", at that time, it was 3.x now libzmq3 is 4.0.4 (it provides libzmq.so."3" ;) - don't know why libreadline is disabled I'll try it again, and also try to push libunicodenames to repository. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#745732: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#745732: (no subject)
Quoting Hideki Yamane (2014-04-26 07:16:09) > On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:52:52 +0200 > wrote: >> There is a 2.0.20140101-1 release in experimental, put together by >> Hideki (cc'ed) who also seems like the most active on that package in >> general. >> >> What's the status of that release? > > Thanks for you ping, Jonas :) > I forgot entirely about it... oh, it's 4 months ago. > Probably would have a time to investigate it in next weekend, around > 3th to 6th May, so please wait it. I'll put it from git to > experimental. Great :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
Bug#745732: (no subject)
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:52:52 +0200 wrote: > There is a 2.0.20140101-1 release in experimental, put together by > Hideki (cc'ed) who also seems like the most active on that package in > general. > > What's the status of that release? Thanks for you ping, Jonas :) I forgot entirely about it... oh, it's 4 months ago. Probably would have a time to investigate it in next weekend, around 3th to 6th May, so please wait it. I'll put it from git to experimental. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#745732: (no subject)
745...@bugs.debian.org From: Jonas Smedegaard Subject: Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#745732: [Pkg-fonts-bugs] Bug#745732: fontforge: Please package new version Quoting Christian PERRIER (2014-04-25 08:01:24) > Quoting D. Stuart Freeman (stuart.free...@et.gatech.edu): >> The version of fontforge currently in unstable is nearly 2 years out >> of date. >> Version 2.0 was released 4 months ago, see: >> https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/releases > > Thank you for pointing us to this. There is a 2.0.20140101-1 release in experimental, put together by Hideki (cc'ed) who also seems like the most active on that package in general. What's the status of that release? > Any volunteer for this among pkg-fonts folks? If relevant, I can offer to get involved with it - but since I am not comfortable with the magic of the short-for dh sequencer, that offer implies switching the packaging to CDBS. I suspect some might not want that (for exact same reason). Please do tell if that is of interest. Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature
