Bug#747609: transition: ruby2.0 removal
On 27/05/14 23:11, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:55:53PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: tags 747609 + confirmed pending forwarded 747609 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.0-rm.html thanks Thanks! On 10/05/14 19:24, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:51:25PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: During the ruby1.9.1-rm transition we discovered very late in the process that we were missing some packages, esp. xapian-bindings. As I know very little about ben, please crosscheck the ben file. Created. Thanks, Christian Ben file: title = ruby2.0; is_affected = .depends ~ /ruby/ | .build-depends ~ /ruby/; you also want to involve the packages that build-depend on gem2deb as they often won't depend on ruby directly. How would we know whether they are good or bad if they don't depend or build depend on ruby? They get dependencies on librubyX.Y generated dynamically based on the ones used at build time. They build-depend on gem2deb, which in turn will depend on the right rubyX.Y/librubyX.Y Adjusted. It doesn't seem to make much of a difference though. Regards, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#747609: transition: ruby2.0 removal
tags 747609 + confirmed pending forwarded 747609 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.0-rm.html thanks On 10/05/14 19:24, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:51:25PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: During the ruby1.9.1-rm transition we discovered very late in the process that we were missing some packages, esp. xapian-bindings. As I know very little about ben, please crosscheck the ben file. Created. Thanks, Christian Ben file: title = ruby2.0; is_affected = .depends ~ /ruby/ | .build-depends ~ /ruby/; you also want to involve the packages that build-depend on gem2deb as they often won't depend on ruby directly. How would we know whether they are good or bad if they don't depend or build depend on ruby? Emilio is_affected = .depends ~ /ruby/ | .build-depends ~ /ruby/ | .build-depends ~ /gem2deb/; is_good = !.depends ~ /ruby2.0/ !.build-depends ~ /ruby2.0/; is_bad = .depends ~ /ruby2.0/ | .build-depends ~ /ruby2.0/; -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#747609: transition: ruby2.0 removal
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:55:53PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: tags 747609 + confirmed pending forwarded 747609 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.0-rm.html thanks Thanks! On 10/05/14 19:24, Antonio Terceiro wrote: On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:51:25PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: During the ruby1.9.1-rm transition we discovered very late in the process that we were missing some packages, esp. xapian-bindings. As I know very little about ben, please crosscheck the ben file. Created. Thanks, Christian Ben file: title = ruby2.0; is_affected = .depends ~ /ruby/ | .build-depends ~ /ruby/; you also want to involve the packages that build-depend on gem2deb as they often won't depend on ruby directly. How would we know whether they are good or bad if they don't depend or build depend on ruby? They get dependencies on librubyX.Y generated dynamically based on the ones used at build time. They build-depend on gem2deb, which in turn will depend on the right rubyX.Y/librubyX.Y -- Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#747609: transition: ruby2.0 removal
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, now that ruby1.9.1 is gone, we, the Ruby maintainers, need to make sure that ruby2.0 is also not included in jessie. Similar to the ruby1.9.1-rm transition, we expect this to be rather smooth, but work on this is only starting now. What we'll need from you in the first step is the ben page. During the ruby1.9.1-rm transition we discovered very late in the process that we were missing some packages, esp. xapian-bindings. As I know very little about ben, please crosscheck the ben file. Thanks, Christian Ben file: title = ruby2.0; is_affected = .depends ~ /ruby/ | .build-depends ~ /ruby/; is_good = !.depends ~ /ruby2.0/ !.build-depends ~ /ruby2.0/; is_bad = .depends ~ /ruby2.0/ | .build-depends ~ /ruby2.0/; signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#747609: transition: ruby2.0 removal
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:51:25PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: During the ruby1.9.1-rm transition we discovered very late in the process that we were missing some packages, esp. xapian-bindings. As I know very little about ben, please crosscheck the ben file. Thanks, Christian Ben file: title = ruby2.0; is_affected = .depends ~ /ruby/ | .build-depends ~ /ruby/; you also want to involve the packages that build-depend on gem2deb as they often won't depend on ruby directly. is_affected = .depends ~ /ruby/ | .build-depends ~ /ruby/ | .build-depends ~ /gem2deb/; is_good = !.depends ~ /ruby2.0/ !.build-depends ~ /ruby2.0/; is_bad = .depends ~ /ruby2.0/ | .build-depends ~ /ruby2.0/; -- Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#747609: transition: ruby2.0 removal
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:51:25 +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, now that ruby1.9.1 is gone, we, the Ruby maintainers, need to make sure that ruby2.0 is also not included in jessie. Please file a serious bug against ruby2.0 titled something like do not ship with jessie, and tag it jessie and sid. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#747609: transition: ruby2.0 removal
* Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [140511 01:35]: Please file a serious bug against ruby2.0 titled something like do not ship with jessie, and tag it jessie and sid. Filed as #747679. -ch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
