Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?
Probably, but why keep it in experimental just because the number scheme is a little bit off. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?
No - please do so. I've been using it from experimental since christmas with no issues. Xorg reports this : [ 4.086] (II) Module intel: vendor=X.Org Foundation [ 4.088] (II) intel: Driver for Intel(R) Integrated Graphics Chipsets: [ 4.088] (II) intel: Driver for Intel(R) HD Graphics: 2000-6000 [ 4.088] (II) intel: Driver for Intel(R) Iris(TM) Graphics: 5100, 6100 [ 4.088] (II) intel: Driver for Intel(R) Iris(TM) Pro Graphics: 5200, 6200, P6300 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:02:37AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: Hi, Now that jessie is out and the freeze is over, would anyone object if I were to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel from experimental to sid now? 3.0 is supposed to be an imminent release [1] anyways. isn't this imminent status given since a year? -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:50:02PM +0200, Søren Holm wrote: Probably, but why keep it in experimental just because the number scheme is a little bit off. see previous discussions on this mailinglist. once there is a proper release I'm all for it. Ask intel why they don't!? -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?
On 28/04/15 12:02, Vincent Cheng wrote: Hi, Now that jessie is out and the freeze is over, would anyone object if I were to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel from experimental to sid now? 3.0 is supposed to be an imminent release [1] anyways. Given that 2.21.x is completely unmaintained, and that the only relevant changes from 2.21.15 to 2.99.901 [1] were SNA enabled by default (which upstream considers ready and which can be reverted anyway) and XMir integration (which we don't care about) I see no reason to withhold this upload any longer. It's not like we're going to release Stretch with 2.21.x again, so the sooner we upload it, the more testing it will get. FWIW I used it for several months without issues. This sounds similar to Grub2 being at 2.02~beta2, or when it was at 1.99 for so long. Cheers, Emilio [1] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/tree/NEWS?id=2.99.901#n1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 15:28:51 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:02:37AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: Hi, Now that jessie is out and the freeze is over, would anyone object if I were to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel from experimental to sid now? 3.0 is supposed to be an imminent release [1] anyways. isn't this imminent status given since a year? Pretty much, yes. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: On 28/04/15 12:02, Vincent Cheng wrote: Hi, Now that jessie is out and the freeze is over, would anyone object if I were to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel from experimental to sid now? 3.0 is supposed to be an imminent release [1] anyways. Given that 2.21.x is completely unmaintained, and that the only relevant changes from 2.21.15 to 2.99.901 [1] were SNA enabled by default (which upstream considers ready and which can be reverted anyway) and XMir integration (which we don't care about) I see no reason to withhold this upload any longer. It's not like we're going to release Stretch with 2.21.x again, so the sooner we upload it, the more testing it will get. FWIW I used it for several months without issues. This sounds similar to Grub2 being at 2.02~beta2, or when it was at 1.99 for so long. Fully agreed here. I've also given out my rationale for updating to 2.99.x in an earlier mail to #748753 [1]. Upstream clearly doesn't particularly care about sane versioning; I don't think it's helpful to get hung up on the versioning scheme and the lack of a formal release here. Regards, Vincent [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748753#45 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?
Hi, Now that jessie is out and the freeze is over, would anyone object if I were to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel from experimental to sid now? 3.0 is supposed to be an imminent release [1] anyways. Regards, Vincent [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-December/057900.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
