Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]
tags 751009 moreinfo thanks Hi Nigel, Please: 1. d/changelog: you didn't put an ITP reference. Please, read it[1] to you see how to make an initial changelog. [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#changelog 2. d/copyright: - You need to add the section 'Files: debian/*' because you can wish make a Debian revision without an upstream revision. - The information in d/copyright is different from upstream code. There is a license file saying GPL-2. However, ppp-gatekeeper file says 2008-2014 GPL-3+. 3. d/ppp-gatekeeper.dirs: remove etc/modprobe.d because d/ppp-gatekeeper.install will create it. 4. d/ppp-gatekeeper.install: you are installing a file inside /etc/shorewall. However, shorewall is a suggestion, not a dependency. So, you must put contrib/start.shorewall in usr/share/docs/ppp-gatekeeper/examples and write a d/README.Debian to explain about how to use this file. 5. d/rules: - override_dh_installdocs: don't install AUTHORS as docs. This information should be provided by d/copyright. I suggest to use d/ppp-gatekeeper.docs ($ man dh_installdocs). - override_dh_clean: I suggest to use d/clean ($ man dh_clean). - You are creating/deleting a manpage.1 but the correct level is 8. 6. You have Lintian messages to solve: W: ppp-gatekeeper: new-package-should-close-itp-bug E: ppp-gatekeeper: description-is-pkg-name PPP Gatekeeper I: ppp-gatekeeper: extended-description-is-probably-too-short Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-04 5:07 GMT-03:00 Nigel Kukard : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ppp-gatekeeper" > > Package name: ppp-gatekeeper > Version : 0.1.0-201406111015-1 > Upstream Author : Nigel Kukard > URL : > http://gitlab.devlabs.linuxassist.net/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper > License : GPL-3+ > Section : net > > It builds this noarch package: > > ppp-gatekeeper - PPP Gatekeeper manages balancing, redundant and failover > PPP link > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/ppp-gatekeeper > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper_0.1.0-201406111015-1.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: > * Correctly use d-clean > * Fix description length > * Removed authors & todo files from install > * Only 1 item in changelog now > * Fixed format of changelog > * Remove log files on purge > > Regards, > Nigel Kukar > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/sig.1324cfc6c2.54081ddb@lbsd.net > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]
On 09/07/2014 04:12 AM, Eriberto Mota wrote: Hi Nigel, Please: 1. d/changelog: you didn't put an ITP reference. Please, read it[1] to you see how to make an initial changelog. [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#changelog The d/changelog file only contains the following... ** pp-gatekeeper (0.1.0-201406111015-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release. (Closes: #758696) -- Nigel Kukard Thu, 04 Sep 2014 07:52:55 + ** I modified this according to the reply in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751009#56 Could you please clarify how this is incorrect so i can fix it? 2. d/copyright: - You need to add the section 'Files: debian/*' because you can wish make a Debian revision without an upstream revision. Could you please clarify this. Upstream (me) already has a debian/ directory, would these files not fall under the Files: * section currently in d/copyright? Do you want me to put the following section in regardless of the above? * Files: debian/* Copyright: 2014 Nigel Kukard License: GPL-3+ * - The information in d/copyright is different from upstream code. There is a license file saying GPL-2. However, ppp-gatekeeper file says 2008-2014 GPL-3+. The file ppp-gatekeeper correctly states GPL-3+ , the d-copyright file correctly states GPL-3+, the upstream LICENSE file also states GPL-3+. Could you please clarify which file you are referring to? 3. d/ppp-gatekeeper.dirs: remove etc/modprobe.d because d/ppp-gatekeeper.install will create it. I'll sort this out, thanks for pointing it out. 4. d/ppp-gatekeeper.install: you are installing a file inside /etc/shorewall. However, shorewall is a suggestion, not a dependency. So, you must put contrib/start.shorewall in usr/share/docs/ppp-gatekeeper/examples and write a d/README.Debian to explain about how to use this file. I'll sort this out, thanks for pointing it out. 5. d/rules: - override_dh_installdocs: don't install AUTHORS as docs. This information should be provided by d/copyright. I suggest to use d/ppp-gatekeeper.docs ($ man dh_installdocs). I already removed this from my last upload, as indicated by https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751009#56 as it does not contain any useful information for a user. - override_dh_clean: I suggest to use d/clean ($ man dh_clean). Already fixed in the latest upload as indicated in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751009#56 - You are creating/deleting a manpage.1 but the correct level is 8. I have corrected this, thank you very much for pointing it out. 6. You have Lintian messages to solve: W: ppp-gatekeeper: new-package-should-close-itp-bug Already fixed as per above. E: ppp-gatekeeper: description-is-pkg-name PPP Gatekeeper Already fixed in latest upload, mentors lintian no longer shows this message. I: ppp-gatekeeper: extended-description-is-probably-too-short I already expanded the description. I'm not seeing this message on local or mentors, could you indicate where you are seeing it? -N -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]
Hi Nigel, Sorry but I was mistaken.m Your mentors page has several versions of the package. I reviewed your package after a hard day and I caught an old version. Can you upload a new version? I saw that you accepted some considerations and I will need review all package again. Please, fix the package and reupload. Thanks for your work. Cheers, Eriberto 2014-09-07 9:53 GMT-03:00 Nigel Kukard : > On 09/07/2014 04:12 AM, Eriberto Mota wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Nigel, >> >> Please: >> >> 1. d/changelog: you didn't put an ITP reference. Please, read it[1] to >> you see how to make an initial changelog. >> >> [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#changelog > > > The d/changelog file only contains the following... > ** > pp-gatekeeper (0.1.0-201406111015-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * Initial release. (Closes: #758696) > > -- Nigel Kukard Thu, 04 Sep 2014 07:52:55 + > ** > > I modified this according to the reply in > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751009#56 > > Could you please clarify how this is incorrect so i can fix it? > >> >> 2. d/copyright: >> - You need to add the section 'Files: debian/*' because you can >> wish make a Debian revision without an upstream revision. > > > Could you please clarify this. Upstream (me) already has a debian/ > directory, would these files not fall under the Files: * section currently > in d/copyright? > > Do you want me to put the following section in regardless of the above? > * > Files: debian/* > Copyright: 2014 Nigel Kukard > License: GPL-3+ > * > >> - The information in d/copyright is different from upstream code. >> There is a license file saying GPL-2. However, ppp-gatekeeper file >> says 2008-2014 GPL-3+. > > > The file ppp-gatekeeper correctly states GPL-3+ , the d-copyright file > correctly states GPL-3+, the upstream LICENSE file also states GPL-3+. > > Could you please clarify which file you are referring to? > > >> >> 3. d/ppp-gatekeeper.dirs: remove etc/modprobe.d because >> d/ppp-gatekeeper.install will create it. > > > I'll sort this out, thanks for pointing it out. > > >> >> 4. d/ppp-gatekeeper.install: you are installing a file inside >> /etc/shorewall. However, shorewall is a suggestion, not a dependency. >> So, you must put contrib/start.shorewall in >> usr/share/docs/ppp-gatekeeper/examples and write a d/README.Debian to >> explain about how to use this file. > > > I'll sort this out, thanks for pointing it out. > > >> >> 5. d/rules: >> - override_dh_installdocs: don't install AUTHORS as docs. This >> information should be provided by d/copyright. I suggest to use >> d/ppp-gatekeeper.docs ($ man dh_installdocs). > > > I already removed this from my last upload, as indicated by > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751009#56 as it does not > contain any useful information for a user. > > >> - override_dh_clean: I suggest to use d/clean ($ man dh_clean). > > > Already fixed in the latest upload as indicated in > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751009#56 > >> - You are creating/deleting a manpage.1 but the correct level is 8. > > > I have corrected this, thank you very much for pointing it out. > >> >> 6. You have Lintian messages to solve: >> >> W: ppp-gatekeeper: new-package-should-close-itp-bug > > Already fixed as per above. > >> E: ppp-gatekeeper: description-is-pkg-name PPP Gatekeeper > > > Already fixed in latest upload, mentors lintian no longer shows this > message. > >> I: ppp-gatekeeper: extended-description-is-probably-too-short > > > I already expanded the description. I'm not seeing this message on local or > mentors, could you indicate where you are seeing it? > > -N -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]
Hi there Eriberto, No problem at all, I really do appreciate your time :) On 09/07/2014 02:40 PM, Eriberto wrote: Hi Nigel, Sorry but I was mistaken.m Your mentors page has several versions of the package. I reviewed your package after a hard day and I caught an old version. Can you upload a new version? I saw that you accepted some considerations and I will need review all package again. Please, fix the package and reupload. I have re-uploaded the latest revision based on your latest review. https://mentors.debian.net/package/ppp-gatekeeper (its the first one in the list) dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper_0.1.0-201406111015-1.dsc -N -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]
Hi Nigel, Your package appears good. We need some last changes to upload it. 2014-09-07 12:36 GMT-03:00 Nigel Kukard : > Hi there Eriberto, > > No problem at all, I really do appreciate your time :) Oh, thanks! I saw your work, applying the corrections pointed by all people. So, I will try to help you to finish this package. My new observations: 1. d/control: remove the name 'PPP Gatekeeper' from short description because when anyone execute an 'apt-cache search', the package name will be showed. Do an '$ apt-cache search a' and you will see that the packages names aren't showed in short descriptions. 2. d/copyright: - About your question, yes, you need split to 'Files: *' and 'Files: debian/*'. The Nigel upstream and Nigel packager can do different works. Imagine you have your upstream program as 2001-2013 and a package did in 2005. However, you need fix some issues in packaging. So, you will have an upstream code 2001-2013 and a packaging 2005-2014 (in other words, your program isn't copyrighted 2014). You can see two examples here[1][2]. [1] http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/v/volatility-profiles/unstable_copyright [2] http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/p/phpwebcounter-extra/unstable_copyright - Other issue is that ppp-gatekeeper file says: "Copyright (C) 2008-2014, Linux Based Systems Design". Your d/copyright say: "Copyright (C) 2010-2014, Linux Based Systems Design". Note that here we have another issue: the upstream is Linux Based Systems Design and the packager is Nigel Kukard. They aren't the same person. So, we have: Files: * Copyright: 2008-2014 Linux Based Systems Design License: GPL-3+ Files: debian/* Copyright: 2014 Nigel Kukard License: GPL-3+ I always like to put a contact for upstream. So, I suggest it (implement if you like this): Files: * Copyright: 2008-2014 Linux Based Systems Design, by Nigel Kukard License: GPL-3+ You can see an example here[3]. [3] http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/c/core-network/unstable_copyright 3. ppp-gatekeeper.README.Debian: you wrote "Shorewall is a recommended package". Change from recommended to suggested. 4. As curiosity, why you says 'Source: https://gitlab.devlabs.linuxassist.net/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper' in d/copyright but uses 'http://download.allworldit.org/ppp-gatekeeper' in d/watch? 5. You have a Lintian message to fix: 'P: ppp-gatekeeper: maintainer-script-without-set-e postrm'.[4] [4] https://lintian.debian.org/tags/maintainer-script-without-set-e.html I need your last effort to be all right. :-) Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]
Hi there Eriberto, On 09/07/2014 09:50 PM, Eriberto wrote: Your package appears good. We need some last changes to upload it. 2014-09-07 12:36 GMT-03:00 Nigel Kukard : Hi there Eriberto, No problem at all, I really do appreciate your time :) Oh, thanks! I saw your work, applying the corrections pointed by all people. So, I will try to help you to finish this package. I thank you again for your valuable input and time Eriberto. My new observations: 1. d/control: remove the name 'PPP Gatekeeper' from short description because when anyone execute an 'apt-cache search', the package name will be showed. Do an '$ apt-cache search a' and you will see that the packages names aren't showed in short descriptions. I have rectified this, thank you for pointing this out. I'm looking at d-policy #3.4 & #5.6.13 but I can't find what the length limit is. I kept the entire line to under 80 to be sure. 2. d/copyright: - About your question, yes, you need split to 'Files: *' and 'Files: debian/*'. The Nigel upstream and Nigel packager can do different works. Imagine you have your upstream program as 2001-2013 and a package did in 2005. However, you need fix some issues in packaging. So, you will have an upstream code 2001-2013 and a packaging 2005-2014 (in other words, your program isn't copyrighted 2014). You can see two examples here[1][2]. [1] http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/v/volatility-profiles/unstable_copyright [2] http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/p/phpwebcounter-extra/unstable_copyright - Other issue is that ppp-gatekeeper file says: "Copyright (C) 2008-2014, Linux Based Systems Design". Your d/copyright say: "Copyright (C) 2010-2014, Thankyou for pointing this out. I have rectified this mistake and added a note to my own checklist. :) I have two questions to ask clarification on: 1. If there were 100 files, each file having a different date range in the copyright line, would I need to list each and every one? For instance, say a package is the combination of a few other projects, its quite possible that some may list 2014, some 2009-2014, some 2004-2005 for instance. 2. My second question is if there are say 5 people listed in the files copyright line, how would these be properly listed? would the first one appear on the copyright line in d-control and the rest below it indented 1 space from the left? Linux Based Systems Design". Note that here we have another issue: the upstream is Linux Based Systems Design and the packager is Nigel Kukard. They aren't the same person. So, we have: Files: * Copyright: 2008-2014 Linux Based Systems Design License: GPL-3+ Files: debian/* Copyright: 2014 Nigel Kukard License: GPL-3+ I always like to put a contact for upstream. So, I suggest it (implement if you like this): Files: * Copyright: 2008-2014 Linux Based Systems Design, by Nigel Kukard License: GPL-3+ You can see an example here[3]. [3] http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/c/core-network/unstable_copyright Thankyou very much for this. You raise perfectly valid points which I missed and I fully understand now. I've also gone through the above links you pasted. As I may not be the only person that authored the files, I changed "by" to "contact", I hope this is acceptable. 3. ppp-gatekeeper.README.Debian: you wrote "Shorewall is a recommended package". Change from recommended to suggested. Thankyou for this, I will ensure I don't make this mistake again in future. 4. As curiosity, why you says 'Source: https://gitlab.devlabs.linuxassist.net/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper' in d/copyright but uses 'http://download.allworldit.org/ppp-gatekeeper' in d/watch? The first link is the revision control site used for the project, The copyright URL points to the revision control site as it is the most up to date. The package was downloaded from the second link you mentioned. While the first site offers limited downloading, it lacks hashes and also doesn't support signatures. On the second site the sources are hashed and signed. It also lists all versions nicely and in a nice order. This download link is also listed in the wiki on the project site. I can change the URL in the copyright file, I just thought it best to point to the revision control URL as this is most up to date. 5. You have a Lintian message to fix: 'P: ppp-gatekeeper: maintainer-script-without-set-e postrm'.[4] [4] https://lintian.debian.org/tags/maintainer-script-without-set-e.html I did have /bin/sh -e , but I have now rectified this to explicitly use set -e :) I need your last effort to be all right. :-) I've been over all mails twice, and I am hoping very much that this time all is good. I've re-uploaded the latest revision. https://mentors.debian.net/package/ppp-gatekeeper (its the first one in the list) dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p
Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]
Hi Nigel, Sorry for my delay. 2014-09-08 7:01 GMT-03:00 Nigel Kukard : >>> Hi there Eriberto, >>> No problem at all, I really do appreciate your time :) I am glad to help you. > I'm looking at d-policy #3.4 & #5.6.13 but I can't find what the length > limit is. I kept the entire line to under 80 to be sure. Here is your answer: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper_0.1.0-201406111015-1.dsc > I have two questions to ask clarification on: > > 1. If there were 100 files, each file having a different date range in the > copyright line, would I need to list each and every one? No. A program is 'one' code only. Consider that you have pacman-cool. See the files: pacman-cool.c, by (John One in 2012, 2013 and 2014) and (Maria Eggs in 2013, under GPL-3+). pacman-cool.h, by (John One in 2013) and (Maria Eggs in 2013, under GPL-3+). pacman-cool.1, by (Maria Eggs in 2014, under GPL-3+). pacman-cool-scores.c, by (Lion Fox in 2013 and 2014, under GPL-3+). The AUTHORS file (or other file) lists the all names above. Then: Files: * Copyright: 2012-2014 John One 2013-2014 Lion Fox Maria Eggs License: GPL-3.0+ You can see more details here: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/#copyright-field > For instance, say a package is the combination of a few other projects, its > quite possible that some may list 2014, some 2009-2014, some 2004-2005 for > instance. The same case, if I think that I understood your question. > 2. My second question is if there are say 5 people listed in the files > copyright line, how would these be properly listed? would the first one > appear on the copyright line in d-control and the rest below it indented 1 > space from the left? Ok. I think that I replied above. See an example here: http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/s/sentinella/unstable_copyright > As I may not be the only person that authored the files, I changed "by" to > "contact", I hope this is acceptable. No problem. I improved the indentation only. >> 4. As curiosity, why you says 'Source: >> https://gitlab.devlabs.linuxassist.net/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper' >> in d/copyright but uses >> 'http://download.allworldit.org/ppp-gatekeeper' in d/watch? > > > The first link is the revision control site used for the project, The > copyright URL points to the revision control site as it is the most up to > date. > > The package was downloaded from the second link you mentioned. While the > first site offers limited downloading, it lacks hashes and also doesn't > support signatures. On the second site the sources are hashed and signed. It > also lists all versions nicely and in a nice order. This download link is > also listed in the wiki on the project site. > > I can change the URL in the copyright file, I just thought it best to point > to the revision control URL as this is most up to date. I think that the best is use a URL only. The copyright file must to say where you really downloaded the code. You can add a 'Comment' field below the 'Source' to list the revision control site. > I've been over all mails twice, and I am hoping very much that this time all > is good. > > I've re-uploaded the latest revision. Your package is very good and I uploaded it. Thanks a lot for your work (as upstream and as packager). Cheers, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ppp-gatekeeper" Package name: ppp-gatekeeper Version : 0.1.0-201406111015-1 Upstream Author : Nigel Kukard URL : http://gitlab.devlabs.linuxassist.net/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper License : GPL-3+ Section : net It builds this noarch package: ppp-gatekeeper - PPP Gatekeeper manages balancing, redundant and failover PPP link To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ppp-gatekeeper Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper_0.1.0-201406111015-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Correctly use d-clean * Fix description length * Removed authors & todo files from install * Only 1 item in changelog now * Fixed format of changelog * Remove log files on purge Regards, Nigel Kukar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]
Hi Nigel, To submit a new package to Debian you need an ITP[1]. Your package haven't an ITP. Please, fix it. Regards, Eriberto [1] https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l1 2014-06-11 7:54 GMT-03:00 Nigel Kukard : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ppp-gatekeeper" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ppp-gatekeeper" Package name: ppp-gatekeeper Version : 0.1.0-201406111015-1 Upstream Author : Nigel Kukard URL : http://gitlab.devlabs.linuxassist.net/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper License : GPL-3+ Section : net It builds this noarch package: ppp-gatekeeper - PPP Gatekeeper manages and load balances main, redundant and failover PPP connections To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ppp-gatekeeper Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper_0.1.0-201406111015-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Changelog now closes ITP bug #758696 Regards, Nigel Kukard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#751009: RFS: ppp-gatekeeper/0.1.0-201406111015-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ppp-gatekeeper" Package name: ppp-gatekeeper Version : 0.1.0-201406111015-1 Upstream Author : Nigel Kukard URL : http://gitlab.devlabs.linuxassist.net/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper License : GPL-3+ Section : net It builds this noarch package: ppp-gatekeeper - PPP Gatekeeper manages redundant and failover PPPOE connections To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ppp-gatekeeper Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/ppp-gatekeeper/ppp-gatekeeper_0.1.0-201406111015-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Fixed watch file using .xz instead of .gz * Fixed indentation of description in control file Regards, Nigel Kukard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
