Bug#754856: buildd.debian.org: please remove s390* from p-a-s for ldc
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 09:44:14AM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:20:08 +0200 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: Sure, but first you need to upload a build that's arch-restricted. Then we try to drop the package from P-a-s anyway so that the architecture field is authoritative. upload of 0.14.0-1 fixed that, I am in the process of working on the ports individually using the porterboxes, don't know when I'm going to be done, but arches will be enabled on a per-case basis. You'll also need to request binary removal from unstable: out of date on armel: ldc (from 1:0.13.0-1) out of date on kfreebsd-amd64: ldc, libllvm-bindings-d (from 0.9.1+hg1634-1) out of date on kfreebsd-i386: ldc, libllvm-bindings-d (from 0.9.1+hg1634-1) out of date on powerpc: ldc, libllvm-bindings-d (from 0.9.1+hg1634-1) Kind regards Philipp Kern` signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#754856: buildd.debian.org: please remove s390* from p-a-s for ldc
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:20:08 +0200 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: Sure, but first you need to upload a build that's arch-restricted. Then we try to drop the package from P-a-s anyway so that the architecture field is authoritative. Hi, upload of 0.14.0-1 fixed that, I am in the process of working on the ports individually using the porterboxes, don't know when I'm going to be done, but arches will be enabled on a per-case basis. Regards Konstantinos pgpdf4NRJHzBY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#754856: buildd.debian.org: please remove s390* from p-a-s for ldc
tag 754856 + moreinfo thanks On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:26:07AM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: Please remove s390/s390x entries from p-a-s for the ldc package. Since I took over the package, I'd like to check what's it's current status with s390* is, if it doesn't I can take it with upstream and if it's easily fixable I can fix it, if not I'll just remove it from the arch list. But as it is in p-a-s right now, it's not much help. Please try to build it on the porterbox first. It built an unusable binary before, which is a bad failure case (#580876). Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#754856: buildd.debian.org: please remove s390* from p-a-s for ldc
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:54:50 +0200 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: tag 754856 + moreinfo thanks On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:26:07AM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: Please remove s390/s390x entries from p-a-s for the ldc package. Since I took over the package, I'd like to check what's it's current status with s390* is, if it doesn't I can take it with upstream and if it's easily fixable I can fix it, if not I'll just remove it from the arch list. But as it is in p-a-s right now, it's not much help. Please try to build it on the porterbox first. It built an unusable binary before, which is a bad failure case (#580876). I've already done this, in fact I'm doing this for all the architectures where it fails(kfreebsd-*, powerpc, mips*, s390x*). So far it fails on all of those, but I'm talking to upstream to eventually fix the failures. In the meantime I'm going to remove the failing arches from the control Architecture field and downgrade the bugs -even when they compiled they were never actually working and supported. Still, I would like to have control of the architecture field and not p-a-s. That way I could easily enable it when it starts to actually work. Regards Konstantinos pgpaqTVReIOnB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#754856: buildd.debian.org: please remove s390* from p-a-s for ldc
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 05:30:57PM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: Please try to build it on the porterbox first. It built an unusable binary before, which is a bad failure case (#580876). I've already done this, in fact I'm doing this for all the architectures where it fails(kfreebsd-*, powerpc, mips*, s390x*). So far it fails on all of those, but I'm talking to upstream to eventually fix the failures. In the meantime I'm going to remove the failing arches from the control Architecture field and downgrade the bugs -even when they compiled they were never actually working and supported. Still, I would like to have control of the architecture field and not p-a-s. That way I could easily enable it when it starts to actually work. Sure, but first you need to upload a build that's arch-restricted. Then we try to drop the package from P-a-s anyway so that the architecture field is authoritative. Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#754856: buildd.debian.org: please remove s390* from p-a-s for ldc
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:20:08 +0200 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: Sure, but first you need to upload a build that's arch-restricted. Then we try to drop the package from P-a-s anyway so that the architecture field is authoritative. Ok, am actually working on that these days. I'll ping you again once it's uploaded. Regards Konstantinos pgpq4JoKVXI7R.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#754856: buildd.debian.org: please remove s390* from p-a-s for ldc
Package: buildd.debian.org Severity: wishlist Please remove s390/s390x entries from p-a-s for the ldc package. Since I took over the package, I'd like to check what's it's current status with s390* is, if it doesn't I can take it with upstream and if it's easily fixable I can fix it, if not I'll just remove it from the arch list. But as it is in p-a-s right now, it's not much help. Thanks Konstantinos pgpYKp70bNRVV.pgp Description: PGP signature
