Bug#759558: gcj-4.9-jdk: broken symlinks for j{awt,ni}{,_md}.h

2014-08-29 Thread Gilles Filippini
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 00:30:56 +0200 Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
 Am 28.08.2014 um 18:08 schrieb Steven Chamberlain:
  reassign 759558 gcj-4.9-jdk
  found 759558 gcc-4.9/4.9.1-9
  thanks
  
  gcj-4.9-jdk isn't a source package, so the BTS seems a little confused
  about who to mail about this bug;  I don't think the maintainers were
  notified.  The original bug report is here:
  https://bugs.debian.org/759558#5
 
 fixed in the VCS.

Any chance to have it uploaded soonish? It is blocking the hdf5 transition.

Thanks in advance,

_g.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#759558: gcj-4.9-jdk: broken symlinks for j{awt,ni}{,_md}.h

2014-08-28 Thread Gilles Filippini
Putting debian@bsd in the loop as adviced by KiBi, because
(gcj-4.9-jdk == default-jdk) on kfreebsd-*.

Thanks,

_g.

On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:15:29 +0200 Gilles Filippini p...@debian.org wrote:
 On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 15:38:22 +0200 Gilles Filippini p...@debian.org wrote:
  Source: gcj-4.9-jdk
  Version: 4.9.1-9
  Severity: serious
  Justification: Make vtk6 FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
  
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA256
  
  Hi,
  
  The last upload of gcj-4.9-jdk breaks the FindJNI.cmake macro, which
  worked correctly with release 4.9.1-8.
 
 I've found out where the problem lies: broken symlinks:
 $ find /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-i386 -type l -xtype l -ls
   16920 lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root   47 Aug 26 07:57 
 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-i386/include/linux/jawt_md.h - 
 /build/i586-linux-gnu/libjava/include/jawt_md.h
   16930 lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root   46 Aug 26 07:57 
 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-i386/include/linux/jni_md.h - 
 /build/i586-linux-gnu/libjava/include/jni_md.h
   16410 lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root   44 Aug 26 07:57 
 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-i386/include/jawt.h - 
 /build/i586-linux-gnu/libjava/include/jawt.h
   16390 lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root   43 Aug 26 07:57 
 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-i386/include/jni.h - 
 /build/i586-linux-gnu/libjava/include/jni.h
 
 Is there a chance to have this fixed soonish? This is a blocker for the
 hdf5 transition.
 
 Thanks,
 
 _g.
 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#759558: gcj-4.9-jdk: broken symlinks for j{awt,ni}{,_md}.h

2014-08-28 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi,

On 28/08/14 16:44, Gilles Filippini wrote:
 Putting debian@bsd in the loop as adviced by KiBi, because
 (gcj-4.9-jdk == default-jdk) on kfreebsd-*.

Thanks, nice to know about this.  FWIW I'd prefer openjdk-7 as
kfreebsd's default JDK.

We may see kfreebsd-specific issues in openjdk-7 or gcj-4.9-jdk from
time to time, but increasingly, if other architectures have switched
over to openjdk-7, we'll see more issues like this which are
FTBFS/broken on kfreebsd but actually due to gcj and not the
architecture itself.

And AIUI gcj is sort of deprecated within the GCC project now?

Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#759558: gcj-4.9-jdk: broken symlinks for j{awt,ni}{,_md}.h

2014-08-28 Thread Steven Chamberlain
reassign 759558 gcj-4.9-jdk
found 759558 gcc-4.9/4.9.1-9
thanks

gcj-4.9-jdk isn't a source package, so the BTS seems a little confused
about who to mail about this bug;  I don't think the maintainers were
notified.  The original bug report is here:
https://bugs.debian.org/759558#5

Thanks,
Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#759558: gcj-4.9-jdk: broken symlinks for j{awt,ni}{,_md}.h

2014-08-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 28.08.2014 um 18:08 schrieb Steven Chamberlain:
 reassign 759558 gcj-4.9-jdk
 found 759558 gcc-4.9/4.9.1-9
 thanks
 
 gcj-4.9-jdk isn't a source package, so the BTS seems a little confused
 about who to mail about this bug;  I don't think the maintainers were
 notified.  The original bug report is here:
 https://bugs.debian.org/759558#5

fixed in the VCS.

 Thanks, nice to know about this.  FWIW I'd prefer openjdk-7 as
 kfreebsd's default JDK.

 We may see kfreebsd-specific issues in openjdk-7 or gcj-4.9-jdk from
 time to time, but increasingly, if other architectures have switched
 over to openjdk-7, we'll see more issues like this which are
 FTBFS/broken on kfreebsd but actually due to gcj and not the
 architecture itself.

 And AIUI gcj is sort of deprecated within the GCC project now?

The good thing about gcj is that it doesn't break with upgrades, while openjdk-7
does on KFreeBSD. We had several months periods where the debian-bsd maintainers
didn't care about updating their patches and were blocking the Debian project
with this kind of attitude. See several emails from my side to the debian-bsd
and debian-java ML's.  Apparently this didn't change with OpenJDK-8, the current
packages fail to build. No effort was made to get the kfreebsd port upstream.  I
agree it would be good to switch to OpenJDK-7 for kfreebsd as well, but I can't
see any action from the KfreeBSD people how to bring the kfreebsd changes
upstream and keep up with the openjdk packages in Debian, and not blocking
current Debian development instead.

  Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org