On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 08:12:10AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 04:23:14PM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > I think a separate pkg-config file for libroken would be reasonable.
> > Ideally this would be upstream rather than Debian-specific. Let's take
> > this to the upstream bug tracker.
>
> Splitting up libroken into a shared package would probably be good.
>
> But I don't see this happening anytime spoon. There simply isn't anyone
> willing to do the work. Plus there has to be people willing to use it if
> the work was done, not convinced that will happen either.
>
> As this is outside the scope of what I can do as a package maintainer I
> have tagged this "wontfix".
Yeah, that seems reasonable.
The main motivator here was Samba, but it has also gone into the other
direction on this - basically just vendoring in a copy of Heimdal,
rather than linking against system Heimdal.
(I'm personally also no longer involved in either Samba or Heimdal
development)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
