Bug#765636: DDPO: watch stopped to work.
On 10/20/2014 09:37 PM, Christian Kastner wrote: I'm afraid this is not the case, some of my packages still show month-old dates, eg: That's not necessarily an indication of the service not working. It's an indication of a low frequency of the checks, yes. https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=python-keyczar https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=libocas https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=libcgroup python-keyczar updated, by now, which is an indication of the service working. The other two didn't. Is it possible that the check is only performed on a monthly basis? If not, the bug should probably be reopend. I tried to find the source code for whatever service does these queries, but couldn't find it. I'm sorry, I cannot answer the question about frequency of checks. Regards Markus Wanner signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#765636: DDPO: watch stopped to work.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:18:34AM +0200, Markus Wanner wrote: On 10/20/2014 09:37 PM, Christian Kastner wrote: I'm afraid this is not the case, some of my packages still show month-old dates, eg: That's not necessarily an indication of the service not working. It's an indication of a low frequency of the checks, yes. https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=python-keyczar https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=libocas https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=libcgroup python-keyczar updated, by now, which is an indication of the service working. The other two didn't. Is it possible that the check is only performed on a monthly basis? If not, the bug should probably be reopend. I tried to find the source code for whatever service does these queries, but couldn't find it. I'm sorry, I cannot answer the question about frequency of checks. I can. The frequency is different per package, depending on the number of past failures. The frequency exponentially slows down with more failures. There must have been a general problem, because we have many packages with high retry counts. I'm now lowering the retry counts manually to speed up processing. The source code is here : anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/mole/watch-requeue/watch-requeue.pl?view=markup Look for number of days to wait before trying again. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#765636: DDPO: watch stopped to work.
On 2014-10-22 12:36, Bart Martens wrote: On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:18:34AM +0200, Markus Wanner wrote: On 10/20/2014 09:37 PM, Christian Kastner wrote: I'm afraid this is not the case, some of my packages still show month-old dates, eg: That's not necessarily an indication of the service not working. It's an indication of a low frequency of the checks, yes. https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=python-keyczar https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=libocas https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=libcgroup python-keyczar updated, by now, which is an indication of the service working. The other two didn't. Is it possible that the check is only performed on a monthly basis? If not, the bug should probably be reopend. I tried to find the source code for whatever service does these queries, but couldn't find it. I'm sorry, I cannot answer the question about frequency of checks. I can. The frequency is different per package, depending on the number of past failures. The frequency exponentially slows down with more failures. There must have been a general problem, because we have many packages with high retry counts. I'm now lowering the retry counts manually to speed up processing. Oh, I see. That is reasonable. BTW, I think #764999 could be another instance of this issue. The source code is here : anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/mole/watch-requeue/watch-requeue.pl?view=markup Look for number of days to wait before trying again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#765636: DDPO: watch stopped to work.
Hi Markus, On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:12:33 +0200 Markus Wanner mar...@bluegap.ch wrote: Hello Andriy, On 10/16/2014 09:27 PM, Andriy Grytsenko wrote: The watch on qa.debian.org suddently stopped to update results. If you look at https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=menu-cache then you will see it shows version 0.7.0 while actual one is 1.0.0~rc1 and on DDPO page it is even worse: minus sigh is shown instead of watch version. I'm not sure if the same not happens for other packages too. Both of these are just lagging behind a bit and have well updated by now. Also notice that the watch file results page clearly features a checked at field. Back when you filed this bug, it indicated that the last check was before the upload of 1.0.0~rc1. I waited a bit to check it really updates, but as it does, I think it's now reasonable to close this bug. I'm afraid this is not the case, some of my packages still show month-old dates, eg: https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=python-keyczar https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=libocas https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=libcgroup Is it possible that the check is only performed on a monthly basis? If not, the bug should probably be reopend. Regards, Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#765636: DDPO: watch stopped to work.
Package: qa.debian.org The watch on qa.debian.org suddently stopped to update results. If you look at https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=menu-cache then you will see it shows version 0.7.0 while actual one is 1.0.0~rc1 and on DDPO page it is even worse: minus sigh is shown instead of watch version. I'm not sure if the same not happens for other packages too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
