Bug#765690: packagename: type_problemheading_here
Package: linux-image-3.17-rc5-amd64 Version: 3.17~rc5-1~exp1 Severity: normal hi, can the following be a kernel problem? I'll explain a bit, it's got to do with the iptables command.. (fwiw, there's a bug with the lsb-functions, 40-systemd which is instead this can be used to test rules.v4 iptables-restore /etc/iptables/rules.v4 ) output, iptables-restore v1.4.21: iptables-restore: unable to initialize table 'nat' Error occurred at line: 2 Try `iptables-restore -h' or 'iptables-restore --help' for more information all basic nat modules I can come up with modprobe are loaded, but iptables continues to fail, I checked if NAT is compiled /boot/config-3.17-rc5-amd64 lsmod |grep nat act_nat12501 0 nft_chain_nat_ipv4 12552 0 nft_nat12507 0 nf_tables 54396 2 nft_chain_nat_ipv4,nft_nat nf_nat_ipv412912 1 nft_chain_nat_ipv4 nf_nat_ipv612920 0 nf_nat 18241 4 nft_chain_nat_ipv4,nft_nat,nf_nat_ipv4,nf_nat_ipv6 nf_conntrack 87476 5 nf_nat,nf_nat_ipv4,nf_nat_ipv6,nf_conntrack_ipv4,nf_conntrack_ipv6 so it looks like everything is compiled and loads, but iptables fails for v4. fwiw, the ip6tables loads properly for rules.v6.. If I recall the previous kernel in testing(vmlinuz-3.16-2-amd64) can have the iptables load ipv4 rules timely without issue -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#765690: packagename: type_problemheading_here
On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 07:12 -0400, westlake wrote: hi, can the following be a kernel problem? Please can you start to make use of the user support forums (e.g. the debian-user mailing list) in the first instance rather than filing things as bugs which are not yet clearly (or even vaguely) identifiable as such. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#765690: packagename: type_problemheading_here
There's a bug in multiple places. 1) netfilter-persistent/systemd fails https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764950 2) Emailed J.Wiltshire, he never responded. He's responsible for the netfilter package 3) There is a systemd bug related to the netfilter-persistent package, filed over here, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765683 linux (3.17-1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium * New upstream release: http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.17 * armel: Drop ixp4xx image. * topconfig: Reenable renamed IP_NF_NAT. (closes #762458) * udeb: refix renamed i2c-core. -- maximilian attems m...@debian.org Tue, 14 Oct 2014 23:01:39 +0200 linux (3.17~rc5-1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium * New upstream release candidate [ Ben Hutchings ] * aufs: Update to aufs3.x-rcN-20140908 [ maximilian attems ] * udeb: fix renamed i2ccore. -- maximilian attems m...@debian.org Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:50:00 +0200 http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/l/linux/linux_3.17-1~exp1_changelog I think it's very clear there was indeed a change with nat in this kernel. This is not a configuration issue, otherwise iptables would be loading successfully without crashing with a NAT message. fwiw, iptables relies on the kernel for the NAT modules, so it appears quite clearly what the problem is, and that is this kernel has something new with NAT causing iptables to fail. Not rocket science. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#765690: packagename: type_problemheading_here
this report is for package maintainers, not clueless idiots. thank you -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org