Bug#768319: #768319 mumudvb version
Hello Yes it makes sense but we need a new package maintainer Brice On Wed, Jul 4, 2018, 08:47 Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Cc += people being listed on > https://salsa.debian.org/groups/vdr-team/-/group_members > > Hello, > > On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 03:57:01PM -0400, Brice Dubost wrote: > > Yes this is true and infortunate. If you know a package maintainer I > > will be happy to help him. > > Given that I'm interested in a package for a version of mumudvb that > supports dvb-t2. Browsing through the history of mumudvb.git it seems it > would be enough to bump to 1.7.2, but I wonder if it would be sensible > to go to 2.0 directly. What do you think? > > Best regards > Uwe >
Bug#768319: #768319 mumudvb version
Cc += people being listed on https://salsa.debian.org/groups/vdr-team/-/group_members Hello, On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 03:57:01PM -0400, Brice Dubost wrote: > Yes this is true and infortunate. If you know a package maintainer I > will be happy to help him. Given that I'm interested in a package for a version of mumudvb that supports dvb-t2. Browsing through the history of mumudvb.git it seems it would be enough to bump to 1.7.2, but I wonder if it would be sensible to go to 2.0 directly. What do you think? Best regards Uwe signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#768319: #768319 mumudvb version
Hello Yes this is true and infortunate. If you know a package maintainer I will be happy to help him. Brice 2017-04-28 2:33 GMT-04:00 Noël Köthe : > Hello, > > just a friendly reminder that the mumudvb is still outdated in Debian. > I build it myself and got it working with DVB-T2 but a packaged version > is much better.;) > > Thanks for your work. > > Regards > > Noël
Bug#768319: #768319 mumudvb version
Hello, just a friendly reminder that the mumudvb is still outdated in Debian. I build it myself and got it working with DVB-T2 but a packaged version is much better.;) Thanks for your work. Regards Noël signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
